Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
brepublican said:
Oh God! Kill me now.


Mellow out and have a shot of MacAllan or light a reefer dude! Whatever works for ya.....No point in blowing your coronaries just yet! Wait until the 64 mb shared memory video card before having a fit!
 
nxent said:
i want someone to have to RESTRAIN me from whipping my wallet out and making an impulse buy...

I've already recruited my housemate and two work colleagues to do just that - unles I can completely justify the purchase I'm not allowed to get it. :(

Problem is I manage to justify most of my Apple related purchases!!:D
 
cr2sh said:
I can't believe Apple would hold a media event to announce a boombox and a mini.

I think we're getting ibooks too!


I agree, who cares about the boombox... the intel mini is cool

I would love to see ibooks today, credit card ready!
 
nxent said:
i want someone to have to RESTRAIN me from whipping my wallet out and making an impulse buy...

Will these do? ;)

mountedrestraint2.jpg
 
i can't wait to see what it's going to be. even though i probably won't buy anything now, but i might later. i hope it's a new ipod, cuz that's the next thing on my list i think. maybe the touch screen with 100gb hard drive?
 
what if its to announce that the origami project is secretly being developed with microstupid? that would be cool. Apple designing and MSFT funding (thus giving apple alot more space financially to design something ****ing awesome.)
 
Concerned

OK, so I'm a little concerned with all the posts regarding "What time is it there?, I only know what time it is here".

It could be that 'stupid rays' and 'idiot gas' is being disseminated from this website, and the internet in general.

I think we should all take precautions by wearing the appropriate safety gear while tracking this thread (safety goggles, gas masks, etc).

Safety first people.
 
mcbade said:
I consider myself "agnostic" as far as the MAC goes. I use Windows, Linux and MAC depending on the use case. I bought a MAC Powerbook for my portable use because it was a lightweight portable Unix box for development reasons. I also like to do digital photography and the Powerbook is good enough for a bit of digital photo processing in the field. The powerbook, although a bit underpowered compared to my PC desktop, is a nice unit. Unfortunately it’s headed for the Apple “EOL” sector. In fact the 15” is already in that category.

I had been awaiting the first Intel based laptops since the announcement and frankly, I'm not all that impressed. I want to be, but I'm just not. There are several features to like but the ones that are chilling me:

Smaller screen
Less ports: Firewire, S-Video
Lees featuered DVD/CD/Burner
Less performance on apps I use such as Adobe Photoshop CS2

Now I believe Adobe will eventually come out with a new version of this app within the year but by then, maybe Apple will come out with a bit more compelling piece of hardware to run this kind of app on. By then, the new hardware should have about the same price point and the Rev ½ MBPs will be “old news”.

I’m REALLY hoping that Apple will plesently supprise me tomorrow with something that will truly excite me in the laptop product line. I really want to be impressed!

Meanwhile I’m glad I purchased the extended warranty!

-John

John, I totally agree with you...I'd like to add that they still need to work on those screens...a lot. My #1 peeve with my 12" PB is not the hardware or anything (hey, I'm a not into photography/movie production/web design etc), but the screen. You can't see it in sunlight, at all, and it seems like it should be 2x as bright, with better colors, and more screen protection (number of pixels for me doesn't need to change).

I digress. I totally agree with you, but one thing that you might want to know is that Macs are Macs, not MAC's. MAC implies an acronym; Mac is an abbreviation for Macintosh. No big deal, but the problem is that some people will take it to mean you don't know what you're talking about. I'm almost like "who cares?" on this one, but just thought you should know.
 
TV and video blahs

Macnoviz said:
I really hope one of the minor announcements will be video content in all countries. In Belgium, we are still awaiting music videos, series (and movies):mad:
Is there anybody else here that doesn't have video and is quite angry for it?

Yes Macnoviz....I live in Canada....just up the west coast from Cupertino, and we're not allowed to buy the TV content yet. We can buy music videos...just not TV.

Slehmann
 
brepublican said:
Oh God! Kill me now.


You do all realise, that irregardless of your time zone, spot on this planet, etc, that from this very moment, until when the presentation starts, is exactly the same amount of time for all of us?
 
slehmann said:
Yes Macnoviz....I live in Canada....just up the west coast from Cupertino, and we're not allowed to buy the TV content yet. We can buy music videos...just not TV.

Slehmann

Just use iTunes US with giftcards off ebAy
 
Piarco75 said:
Not a chance in hell my friend! 2ghz? its a Mac mini at the end of the day - entry level despite possible media hub capabilities. I'd say 1.67ghz Core Duo - tops. Due to the possible inclusion of a full sized HDD the memory is a distinct possibility. X1600? Nope - Fine for its big brother but not for the mini. More like a X1300. And that'll top out at 128MB.
The sound atributes sound like they are destined for the pro line only, so I doubt we'll see them. Optical 5.1 out would be possible though. 8x Superdrive? Bloody well hope so!!
DVI & HDMI? Either will do. No need for two ports when an adapter will do.
The biggest no-no will be the tuner though. I've said it before and I'll say it again - Apple is not about to make region specific computers. We need a different tuner to the States, France needs a different tuner to us etc.... far to expensive. And thats before you get into the whole satellite/cable issues...
And all of that in the same case? Yep, sure.... if its the TARDIS or some other space warping design.

Its a nice setup you've proposed though. It'd need a bigger case though, and the cost would be only marginally less than the basic iMac to make it viable though. So I'd say:

Bigger design than existing Mac mini
1.67ghz Core Duo
Up to 2GB DDR2
3.25" HDD
8x Superdrive
Optical Out
DVI or HDMI
X1300 128MB

Front Row 2.0


This setup will be enough to simply destroy my 1.42 G4 Mac Mini... It will be at least 3x most powerfull or more on Universal applications... ILife 06 will fly...

But, I think the price would need to be rised... at least $800 to a config like this...

Man, I would buy it in a heartbeat!!!!!
 
slehmann said:
Yes Macnoviz....I live in Canada....just up the west coast from Cupertino, and we're not allowed to buy the TV content yet. We can buy music videos...just not TV.

Slehmann


We don't even have a Mac Store nearby! (No I do not live in Toronto)
 
so how many hours till the announcement - i am gonna get ready for it - i hope it will be big - i hope the ipod hifi thingie are just small announcements and there is a whoopa - i hope it won't be small and apple please give me something more on the ipod - i want wifi don't make me wait till the next revision - i think it is aweful in this day and age i don't have something that can go in my pocket and has wifi and a decent browser - come on my wallet is waiting ...
 
ipod video

don't care about anything else, all i want is a full screen, touch ipod. Just as good as av 500, with 80gb hd and tv recording capabilities... and all the obvious other stuff.
may have to wait till 1st April(too long), but i really only want to wait an hour and a half.
any1 agree??
 
Shaker said:
Does anyone seriously think that Apple can deliver a Mac Mini with the hardware capable of flawlessly handling DVR type functions for under $1000 AND keep the form factor as small as the current mini? This has to be a whole new product from the ground up.

If a mini is $499 and an eyeTV is $300, then sure, they can do it for under a grand no problem. They really just need to get h.264 encode onto a chip. If they can do decode on a chip in an iPod, I don't see why they can't get encode into a mini.

Romanesq said:
The original comment was that 99% of people are happy with AAC downloads. I merely pointed out that I'm not. I'm completely comfortable that there is out there in the land of audophilia more than 1.000000001% who agree that AAC downloads should be improved.

That's not what you said. You said that 99% of people were NOT happy with AAC. I guess you need to be more clear next time?

Carl Spackler said:
An Apple Media center does not need a processor strong enough to run OSX, just something powerful enough to run Front Row. It doesn't even need OSX. Really, who's going to do any standard computer functions on their TV, even if it is 1080p?

I could be wrong, but I think a DVR just adds an element of complication that Apple does not need to concern themselves with...regionality of scheduling, NTSC/PAL/SECAM, etc. With the iTMS not yet worldwide, why jump into this? Other have already posted the question of conflict between selling shows, and presenting a product that allows you to bypass the buying process.

Completely agree with the first part. To make a DVR cost competitive, it would be best to keep it as stripped down as possible. I don't think they even need to put storage in the box, just make it more of a video airport express than a TIVO. Box with a tuner, AV ins and outs, airport and ethernet, and probably a codec encode/decode chip to keep bandwidth down.

Why jump into this? Because it's the way things are headed. If apple doesn't do it, someone else will, and they'll lose a pretty sizable potential market. TIVO is doing well, but only because there aren't any affordable alternatives. And what does Apple care if they lose some iTunes sales if it means they sell more hardware units? Apple makes a LOT more on the hardware sales, they'd probably be fine with giving away songs on the iTunes store, but the record companies wouldn't let that happen.

If apple was so worried about the supposed conflict between selling media and letting people get it on their own, why does iTunes support ripping CD's to mp3? Doesn't seem to hurt their song sales, does it?

tjwett said:
so basically you want to squeeze what could be the next Power Mac inside a 2 by 6 inch brick? i dunno about that.

That list is pretty ambitious, but nothing that's physically large. It's mostly ports. Faster CPU isn't bigger, more ram is only a little more space. Even a TV tuner can probably be put onto a chip. The powermacs are about internal expansion, and chips WAY faster than a core duo. They'll likely have more than two cores and higher clock speeds.

MarcelV said:
Do you want a Mac mini or a Mac media. Your product requirements don't fit a Mac mini. That's a low-end machine, you're talking mid-end, or high end media machine here.

The base mini is a low end machine. Nobody expects all those features in a $499 machine, but there will be more expensive (or BTO) versions as well. I happen to think that they could do a DVR verson for $499 or less, the compromise would be minimal computer features (less ram, slow processor) There's no reason the mini can't be a media machine. Although if they did a reasonably priced DVR in a different case I'm sure nobody would complain.

jamieg said:
they aint gonna let you burn em to DVD

You can burn them to DVD *now*. You're just limited to data dvd, not video DVD.
 
Interesting how Steve didn't save the new content on iTunes today for the event.Either it wasn't worthy ( which it isn't imho ) or it's a smokescreen..

Apple's getting real good at putting smokescreens up there..

Watch Out!!
 
Fabio_gsilva said:
This setup will be enough to simply destroy my 1.42 G4 Mac Mini... It will be at least 3x most powerfull or more on Universal applications... ILife 06 will fly...

But, I think the price would need to be rised... at least $800 to a config like this...

Man, I would buy it in a heartbeat!!!!!

i'd say it'd have to be more like $1000 to be reasonable, but i just don't see it. it'd be better than my 17" intel imac, that i paid $1200 for.
 
lindmar said:
Just use iTunes US with giftcards off ebAy

Thanks Lindmar....never even occurred to me.

If I get desperate to see something, I'll give it a try.

Slehmann
 
shyataroo said:
what if its to announce that the origami project is secretly being developed with microstupid? that would be cool. Apple designing and MSFT funding (thus giving apple alot more space financially to design something ****ing awesome.)

Lol. Sorry, I shouldn't laugh, and in fact I hate the whole "LOL" thing. But Apple being funded by MS to design a product whose profits they'll share or something, running WinXP? Jobs has no problem allowing software on Mac OS X - that's how it should be - but promoting the pain and suffering of Windows to innocent people? Jobs is a capitalist, not a sadistic demon with bad product-naming skills. I can assure you that there will be a few good points in the defective Origami, but nothing "****ing awesome," being guided by no more than a philosophy of expensive gadgetry, without strong notions of form and function, of use and practicality, of aesthetics, or of focus.
 
tolly said:
don't care about anything else, all i want is a full screen, touch ipod. Just as good as av 500, with 80gb hd and tv recording capabilities... and all the obvious other stuff.
may have to wait till 1st April(too long), but i really only want to wait an hour and a half.
any1 agree??

i agree. except i wouldn't mind a 100 gb hard drive. it'd be nice. i'm in the market for a ipod anyways. can't wait (and April 1st is too long). actually, my spring break is next week, i might need an ipod buy then ...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.