Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, call me stupid but when 100,000+ people have unlocked iPhones, I think Apple does kind of have a responsibility in that, they could have tested the new firmware on an unlocked iPhone to see what happened.

How do we know it is 100,000+ unlocked iPhones?
 
You say that Apple have no incentive to intentionally brick phones, then that Apple could have made sure that the phones didn't brick. Well, call me stupid but when 100,000+ people have unlocked iPhones, I think Apple does kind of have a responsibility in that, they could have tested the new firmware on an unlocked iPhone to see what happened.

Legally they don't owe these users anything, but ethically, this is still 100,000 customers, why not spend, $75,000 on developing a way around bricking the iPhones but relocking instead, as of those customers who then revert back to AT&T, any money lost on developing will be made in Apple's cut of the call charges.

You probably won't agree with me, but see it from that point of view. 100,000 customers (a lot of which are the most passionate Apple customers) is no small deal.

Spending $75,000 to please 100,000 iPhone hackers would turn into more and more future expense supporting future hacks--or trying and failing to--and in the end making people mad all the same anyway.

And I have to doubt your 100k figure: that would be ~10% of all iPhones!
 
Spending $75,000 to please 100,000 iPhone hackers would turn into more and more future expense supporting future hacks--or trying and failing to--and in the end making people mad all the same anyway.

And I have to doubt your 100k figure: that would be ~10% of all iPhones!

now you're getting close to the truth of the matter in my opinion.

the more I think about it, the more this seems like a CS move.

CS can be a huge expense. Locking down all iPhones to one format will save Apple enormous amounts of money.

This is totally independent of any obligation to AT&T or their desire to keep that revenue flowing.
 
How do we know it is 100,000+ unlocked iPhones?

If you know anyone who lives in Europe (particularly France, UK or Germany) ask them, iPhones can spotted on the street. Ask any Apple retail employee and they will or won't tell you that several times a day someone comes in and wants to buy 50+ iPhones. None of these phones are being activated on AT&T.
 
If you know anyone who lives in Europe (particularly France, UK or Germany) ask them, iPhones can spotted on the street. Ask any Apple retail employee and they will or won't tell you that several times a day someone comes in and wants to buy 50+ iPhones. None of these phones are being activated on AT&T.

Please don't make me explain the difference between anecdotal and scientific observation.

Please?
 
If you're implying that your statements are anything other than opinion then please do.

It's the difference between saying the moon is made is cheese and actually going to the moon, digging up a sample of moon rock, and testing it for the presence or absence of cheese.

The former is speculative and, while perhaps making for interesting conversation, ultimately useless, while the latter actually gives you real information that you can use to make sense of the world we live in.
 
What angers me more then anything about this, is it ties up the Genius Bar and people with actual tech issues that were not SELF INFLICTED are forced to wait, sometimes for many hours to get help. Now it will become worse, with people lining up to get their broken phones fixed.

I assure you, a very large % of problems people have with their computers for which they seek tech support, are "self inflicted" :D
 
Lmao

Some people just can't read. The Software License Agreement is plain and simple. Unlocking an iPhone is reverse engineering the firmware and prohibited by the agreement. End of story. Apple owes you nothing. It's not apples fault you can't comply with the Software License Agreement you made with apple when you pushed the power button the first time. The license agreement clearly states "BY USING YOUR iPHONE, YOU ARE AGREEING TO BE BOUND BY THE TERMS OF THIS LICENSE."
 
Wrong, sir! Wrong! Under section 37B of the contract signed by him, it states quite clearly that all offers shall become null and void if - and you can read it for yourself in this photostatic copy - "I, the undersigned, shall forfeit all rights, privileges, and licenses herein and herein contained," et cetera, et cetera...”Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum," et cetera, et cetera...”Memo bis punitor delicatum!" It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal! You stole fizzy lifting drinks. You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and sterilized, so you get nothing! You lose! Good day sir!
 
Apple must surely have to release a restore utility - or be sued - and lose. Do they make you sign a contract when you purchase the device in store? I wasn't aware they did. I thought the contract and terms of use started when you activated the phone.

Surely they've got to allow you to restore the device to how it was when you left the store (and before you entered into any terms of use contract)? They surely have to give you the opportunity to use the device "as it was intended".

Sorry having a little problem with this logic. You state that they are under obligation to restore the phone to factory standard when it was the comsumer that modified the software?

A lot of companies will not service your computer until returned to original state by the comsumer. If you change a video card and later have problems Dell and others will require you to re-install the original equiptment first. So if you modded the software on the iPhone, you need to get it back to factory state before they will service you. If you can''t then they can refuse you service or ..... charge you some green backs to restore you.
 
I think some people here need to read 1984! In a surreal twist of fate, Apple has become Big Brother!

No, I was simply saying (read it properly, please): Apple must surely enable those who have purchased an iPhone to restore their device to the state it was when they left the store. I'm not saying they have to allow you to hack the device in the future.

You don't enter into an SLA contract until you USE the device/service. If Apple wanted to stop people from being able to purchase an iPhone without agreeing to its terms of USE, they would have to get you to agree to it before ringing the device through their registers. Or change their general terms of sales.

Once again people are making legal claims with apparently no knowledge of the laws.

We know there are a lot of people out there that are just agravated. That is fine, you want to bitch, that is fine. But to make statements as to the legality of their actions and the rights of the hacker with zero laws to back you, serves no-one and only confuces others that can't tell the difference between a rant and the law.

If you turned the power on on the the device you used it. If you opened the box you intended to use it. If you did not like the conditions of the contract you had the ability to return it un-open and also after opening for a fee. The contract language is clear for the vast majority of the people. Define "IS".
 
Wrong, sir! Wrong! Under section 37B of the contract signed by him, it states quite clearly that all offers shall become null and void if - and you can read it for yourself in this photostatic copy - "I, the undersigned, shall forfeit all rights, privileges, and licenses herein and herein contained," et cetera, et cetera...”Fax mentis incendium gloria cultum," et cetera, et cetera...”Memo bis punitor delicatum!" It's all there, black and white, clear as crystal! You stole fizzy lifting drinks. You bumped into the ceiling which now has to be washed and sterilized, so you get nothing! You lose! Good day sir!

Awesome!!

Post of the day!!
 
If you installed some kind of window manager on your macbook, would it be ok for the computer to shutdown and not restart because you are no longer in tune with the user experience that apple had planned for you?

If the WIndowing interface caused problems with the original software, then yes, it is not only acceptale, but an expected outcome. And no, Apple is not obligated to fix you hacked macbook. Any unsupported modifications - ANY - on any device are done at your own peril. If you have the knowledge and wherewithal to do the hacks, you should be fully capable of grasping the consequences too.

If you bricked your iPhone and are whining about it, you better believe I'm going to think twice about letting you use my computer!

Does it make you a "bad" person?

No, and no one is saying you're a bad person. You're simply a person who took a gamble, and lost.
 
Not to mention, the SLA for OSX is different than the SLA for an iPhone. The SLA for OSX on a Mac allows for installation of 3rd party software. The SLA for the iPhone doesn't. Bad analogy.
 
So what happens someone brings in their modified iPhone for whatever reason and the Genius updates the firmware without the owner's consent, destroying his/her $400 investment?

Because that happened to me tonight :(
 
^^What was the reason? Because ever since I bought 3 phones and unlocked them I haven't dared bring them to the apple store for service (not that they've needed to be serviced or anything). I would have thought that would be common sense.

I bought the first one with the understanding that whatever messed up in the unlock/mod process would be my own responsibility, and relying on Apple would be pretty stupid. When the unlock worked on the first, my dad and sister were happy so they got one each for themselves and I did those too.

No offense, but handing your phone to an Apple or AT&T customer service rep, especially now that the update is out, is pretty much guaranteeing that it will get bricked if it's unlocked.
 
So you modified your phone and brought it to an Apple store. The Genius carried out his normal procedure for servicing an iPhone and your implying it's the Genius's fault your phone is bricked? LMAO Did you inform the Genius that you made unauthorized modifications to your phone?



So what happens someone brings in their modified iPhone for whatever reason and the Genius updates the firmware without the owner's consent, destroying his/her $400 investment?

Because that happened to me tonight :(
 
^^What was the reason? Because ever since I bought 3 phones and unlocked them I haven't dared bring them to the apple store for service (not that they've needed to be serviced or anything). I would have thought that would be common sense.

I bought the first one with the understanding that whatever messed up in the unlock/mod process would be my own responsibility, and relying on Apple would be pretty stupid. When the unlock worked on the first, my dad and sister were happy so they got one each for themselves and I did those too.

No offense, but handing your phone to an Apple or AT&T customer service rep, especially now that the update is out, is pretty much guaranteeing that it will get bricked if it's unlocked.

Even before modification, it had a software-based fault. It was one of those things where you never really know it's gone or if it's isolated because it doesn't appear consistently (or often) at all. So, when it reared its ugly head again even after modification, I felt that I was entitled to an exchange since the hacks obviously had nothing to do with it. I took it to them to get it swapped out; I demonstrated the problem and they disappeared with my phone. I thought they were getting me a new one, but instead they decided that they were going to try and fix the problem without even letting me know. I didn't even get a simple, "We're going to try to restore the phone, hang on for a few minutes." They just left with it and brought it back to me as a brick and denied the exchange. So I walked in with a working unit (pre-existing software defect excluded) and left with a brick.

Does that sound in any way fair to you? Does modifying my phone mean that I deserved to have them brick it without my authorization?
 
You are insane, then.

Modifying a phone is NOT illegal; it means that my warranty is void and I understand that. It does not mean that they can take my modified phone to the back, insert the final nail in the coffin without my consent (updating to 1.1.1, which based on all the signage they KNOW can and will kill modified units), then hand it back to me like that.

If I walk in with a working phone, I should leave with one -- especially if NO WORK was authorized. Simple as that.
 
even after modification, I felt that I was entitled to an exchange since the hacks obviously had nothing to do with it.

That's your problem. The old "entitlement mentality" even when YOU took action that absolves Apple of ANY liability. Not to mention, if you KNEW the warranty was void, on what grounds did you feel "entitled to an exchange?" And who are you to say that it was OBVIOUS the hacks had nothing to do with it?

And so, sir, are YOU insane? Or just willfully ignoring information that was right in front of you all the time? :rolleyes:
 
That's your problem. The old "entitlement mentality" even when YOU took action that absolves Apple of ANY liability.

And so, sir, are YOU insane? Or just willfully ignoring information that was right in front of you all the time?

Do not edit my posts and change the context. Thank you.

The fault that prompted my exchange request existed prior to any modification. FACT.

And that's why I showed up. I didn't request for them to fix the problem, I asked for an exchange ONLY. I demonstrated the problem on the spot, which is exactly what I was supposed to do if I wanted an exchange. Furthermore, I was not at the Genius Bar but the front register. In other words, I did not bring it in for service or expecting service at all.

I am entitled to an exchange because the fault existed before any modification and therefore the hacks had absolutely nothing to do with it. Do you not understand this? :confused:
 
The fault that prompted my exchange request existed prior to any modification. FACT.

And that's why I showed up. I didn't request for them to fix the problem, I asked for an exchange ONLY.

But you couldn't be bothered to exchange the phone BEFORE you hacked it. FACT.

You were not "entitled" to an exchange. You were entitled to a phone that worked as Apple and AT&T intended. So they could very well have simply taken it in for repair. If you bothered to read the warranty, Apple has, at its option, the right to repair or replace.

And once you hacked it, you were perfectly willing to hand in a phone you KNEW to be outside Apple's warranty--by your own admission--for a new one. That, sir, comes very very close to what we call "fraud."
 
I hope Apple do get sued, serves them right for stopping our freedom to do whatever we want with OUR OWN DEVICES!

The complete lack of thought in this comment amazes me. You broke your end of the bargain by hacking the iPhone. Apple isn't suddenly saying you can't use your iPhone. Continue to use it as it currently is. Just don't expect them to hold up their end of the bargain (to fix software bugs through updates) if you didn't uphold your end.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.