Pity most people on the internet don't have enough gumption and backbone to be HONEST, and say that "Yeah, I can see how it could be a problem, but without deeper investigation and discussion, I'll hold off any judgement until I know all the facts"
Folks are too scared to speak their minds, and bow to peer pressure from random strangers online thinking their opinion could be seen as "controversial", so they herd together in the "for" or "against" groups, and just blindly parrot what everyone ELSE in their chosen group is saying - never mind FACT.
"Ohhh, I have to be seen as having a say, or I'll appear weak or... perish the thought... FAIR"
#growapairandbeaman
PS: I hold nothing against this "Lou" bloke personally, I just think that what he has done was HIGHLY dubious, and perhaps not the best decision, as a "high profile" reviewer. Then again, ratings rule above common sense and discretion, in a world of superficiality and hype...
I am confident he is a very nice fellow, his actions were just a little unwise.
Folks are too scared to speak their minds, and bow to peer pressure from random strangers online thinking their opinion could be seen as "controversial", so they herd together in the "for" or "against" groups, and just blindly parrot what everyone ELSE in their chosen group is saying - never mind FACT.
"Ohhh, I have to be seen as having a say, or I'll appear weak or... perish the thought... FAIR"
#growapairandbeaman
PS: I hold nothing against this "Lou" bloke personally, I just think that what he has done was HIGHLY dubious, and perhaps not the best decision, as a "high profile" reviewer. Then again, ratings rule above common sense and discretion, in a world of superficiality and hype...
I am confident he is a very nice fellow, his actions were just a little unwise.