I really don't understand all this hyperventilating.
Its clear that there are some areas, particularly internationally, that are quite bad. But this is far from 'most' places.
"most places"? try rest of the world (and Manhattan)...
Do people just believe that Apple is not attempting to fix these? Much of this data can be purchased, and Apple is undoubtedly already pursuing this.
People seem to be pissed off by a very useless product replacing a very useful product - that might lead to hyperventilating and I would do that too but Apple just moved a restaurant and a pharmacy into my kitchen so I'd rather have some free latte and some pills...
First, let's not indulge fantasies about Google Maps:
- Google's data is not all in-house. They license and buy data (especially vector data) just like everyone else. Apple can do a lot of the same.
- Google's maps are not perfect. Google Maps has alternated between reporting my home address correctly and wildly incorrectly seemingly every month for the past 3 years.
- OMG, clouds in imagery! Different seasons! Google has many of these same issues. There are plenty of places where Google Maps has crap imagery. I've personally seen imagery in Google Maps that is probably 1km LANDSAT imagery. But, again, this changes frequently, and because Google doesn't own their own satellites, they buy this data just like everyone else. Guess what? So can Apple.
You really need to read up on the way Google Maps works and the way they get their data. First of all - Google Maps is MASSIVELY crowd-sourced, You can map and submit a blank spot yourself if you need to (a lot of poor neighborhoods in Africa are done this way). Second, they are updating rapidly - this is why you get few errors in directions and locations, it's up to date quickly. Google (or partners) also does a lot of flyovers - and by now a great deal of the world is in a rather high definition.
Apple doesn't seem to fix any of the errors people submit - there's been a lot of examples of people providing input even since the first beta. It's unclear how anybody can "help" Apple with more accurate data - other than the "report a problem" thing that they generally seem to ignore and is useless if You want to fix the 1000 things that are wrong around you - Google has this down to an art-form and they must be laughing their asses off right now.
Databases like this are never 'done'. They are always being updated. And yes, usage matters. No amount of manual review can cover the globe, its going to require user feedback.
Sure it does - but again, tell me the "other way" of submitting data, the one that doesn't go to the "manual review", I'd be happy to help but not by submitting things through a tiny keyboard on an iPhone. You can fix Google maps from a browser.
I used to write GIS software for a large military subcontractor. I worked intimately with a very large GIS vector data production team. I know what is involved in a database like this. Its a massive undertaking, but it can evolve rapidly. I can very easily see Apple wholesale purchasing vector/imagery data for 'bad' regions and dropping it in quickly.
The imagery will improve. The vectors will improve. Probably quickly.
Why did they use old datasets from TomTom then? Why haven't they already purchased the missing data - after all the app has now launched? This is a massive undertaking - ask Google, Apple simply wasn't prepared for this thing, and they will never catch up...
If there was to be one area where I actually do believe Apple is in trouble, it would be with the search/POI data. This data isn't of much general utility to the broader GIS community, so there are relatively few places to obtain it. I imagine for this they are going to have to rely more heavily on crowdsourcing or broker a deal with Microsoft/Nokia possibly.
Microsoft/Nokia can't help with POI (they have very few) and do You really think Apple is going from Google to Microsoft? This disaster will just have to play out, IOS will be crippled for a long time in maps/search.