The price increases across the board are understandable — when Apple themselves says they've never seen component costs rise this much, this quickly, and Tim Cook calls the situation "unsustainable," it's hard to argue they had much of a choice. RAM and storage costs spiraling because of AI chip demand is a real, industrywide pressure, and Apple actually held out longer than most.
That said, the MacBook Neo increase stings in a particular way that the others don't. The Neo wasn't just another laptop — it was a statement. At $599, it genuinely disrupted the Windows PC market in a way Apple hadn't in years. ASUS called it a "shock." Dell scrambled to respond with the XPS 13. That $599 price wasn't incidental; it was the whole point. Crossing the $700 threshold changes the conversation, even if only psychologically.
At $699, is the MacBook Neo still a good deal? Honestly, yes — especially when you look at what Windows alternatives in that range actually offer. The XPS 13 now starts at the same $699 and even Dell admits it's playing catch-up on Apple Silicon performance and battery life. The Neo is still likely the best laptop you can buy at that price. But it's no longer the instant, obvious win it was at $599. It requires a bit more justification now, and that's a loss even if the hardware itself hasn't changed.
What I'm most relieved about is that iPhones were spared — for now. The iPhone isn't just a product; for most people it's the center of their digital life, and a price hike there would hit differently than a laptop increase. When your phone plan, your payment app, your navigation, your camera, and your daily communications all live in one device, even a $100 increase can feel like a tax on participation. The MacBook Neo is a considered purchase. An iPhone upgrade, for many, feels like a necessity. Keeping that price stable is Apple protecting something important — and I really hope they continue to hold that line come September.