I don't feel OS X has been dumbed down, I feel that it been overly complicated. iOS has many ideas that work great on iOS device because they compliment the touch interface. Gigantic icons, gesture based interaction, full screen apps etc are necessary for computing on a small device that avoids complicated peripherals. But OS X is built for large non-touch screen hardware so how does spreading your apps across 10 pages with 2" icons promote efficiency? Or how does pushing apps to run full screen make multitasking easier when the OS supports REAL multitasking? Or how. Do complicated, unintuitive gestures on a separate trackpad properly emulate the physical interaction we get when gesturing on an iPad?
I'm not slamming Lion and I'm glad to upgrade to it. But I feel that, until Jobs allows touchscreen Macs, the adoption of iOS paradigms into OS X is unnecessary and confusing. I definitely would like to see the desktop UI evolve, but not into a touch based interface that doesn't allow touch input.
I'm not slamming Lion and I'm glad to upgrade to it. But I feel that, until Jobs allows touchscreen Macs, the adoption of iOS paradigms into OS X is unnecessary and confusing. I definitely would like to see the desktop UI evolve, but not into a touch based interface that doesn't allow touch input.