Glad to see that it is official and it will be available real soon.
Indeed a lot of choice, only two pages: https://www.thomann.de/intl/thunderbolt_interfaces.htmlAgreed, there's only a few hundred million devices out there that can use it.
Yes. Nevertheless, there are literal MIDI renditions/translations of those sheet music – and you can listen to those instead...The sheet music is public domain. The recordings often are not because (shocker) people had to perform and record and publish it and need to get paid to, you know, live.
If you see classical music as a generic commodity where any recording is interchangable with any other, I guess it doesn't matter to you and you'll do fine on archive.org.
*EXACTLY* - To hell with all these specialized apps. I hate that I can't delete Safari, people could just email me the contents of the sites I'd like to see. And word processors are a complete waste of time and money as well - in most cases you end up sending that "document" to someone via email anyway, so you might as well type your book in Mail.app.This is app equivalent of “this could’ve been an email”. It should’ve been a tab on an existing app.
Those are pretty much the equivalent of having Siri read you an audiobook. Dull, monotonous and mechanical.Yes. Nevertheless, there are literal MIDI renditions/translations of those sheet music – and you can listen to those instead...
The music is already available through the Apple Music app. If you are happy finding classical music in the Apple Music app, I'm happy for you. Personally, I find that the Apple Music app doesn't work for classical music. I'm pretty sure it's the same thing for many others.Why does this need to be a separate app? It's all just music... 🤷♂️
I don't think you listen to a lot of classical music, do you?Yes. Nevertheless, there are literal MIDI renditions/translations of those sheet music – and you can listen to those instead...
The classical music is included as part of Apple Music. However, finding classical music pieces doesn't work well with the Apple Music app. For classical music you need different search options than for contemporary music.I’m surprised that this is not included as part of Apple Music.
Since it's not a seperate license, we will never know. But like many others, you don't understand the difference between searching for classical music vs searching for "everything else". This feature is essential to those interested, and as is blatantly obvious by the many people asking this question, meaningless to everyone else. FOR THAT EXACT REASON, putting it as a seperate app rather than cluttering up the UI in the existing app, is the best option for everyone.I don't get the purpose. Will Apple release 10 new music apps based on genre as "brand-new feature" in summer then? Or a 100 based on *fill_in_the_blanks*? Doubtful they are going to make a decent revenue with this thing.
Search for classical is totally borked. Not bad, not awkward, but useless. You may as well be throwing darts at a stack of CDs. And the central problem is that track/artist/album just doesn’t fit classical and can’t be made to — square peg, round hole. Apple has finally realized that classical search is a problem of its own that needs a solution of its own.This should part of the Apple Music app. Why have a separate app? Just make a classical music inside the Apple Music app. What am I missing?
Hence being at the front of the queue to tell them all there’s nothing to see here. 😂This is about as exciting as wet paint.
I hope so. But remember there are two parts to the problem -- having a good interface for searching metadata, and having good consistent metadata to search. Buying Primephonic got Apple a solid, coherent, first-class metadata collection but only for classical. I *hope* that inspires Apple to invest big in collecting metadata of a similar quality for the rest of their music, without which an improved search interface wouldn't matter.i believe this app will be folded later into the Music app.
What metadata is missing for pop music that would be useful? Like, are people searching for songs composed by Hillary Lindsey or something?I hope so. But remember there are two parts to the problem -- having a good interface for searching metadata, and having good consistent metadata to search. Buying Primephonic got Apple a solid, coherent, first-class metadata collection but only for classical. I *hope* that inspires Apple to invest big in collecting metadata of a similar quality for the rest of their music, without which an improved search interface wouldn't matter.
🤔 Which do you think Apple cares more about, sales of iOS devices or a $450 - $8,800 Thunderbolt audio interface that someone else manufacturers? iOS 16 has been out for 6 months and they still don't have this tent-pole feature ready to go.Indeed a lot of choice, only two pages: https://www.thomann.de/intl/thunderbolt_interfaces.html
if it were up to me, I would make a separate media player that would only control the iOS device. so that the sound does not have to go through the iOS device.
I also wonder if we might see this paired with a new pair of headphones designed specifically for listening to classical music. AirPods Max 2.0 maybe?
Why does one genre need a separate app why can’t it be in the main music app
How do you expect to listen to it if performers don’t get paid? The sheet music might be public domain (excluding the VAST amount of contemporary music this also includes) but recordings are not. The fact that a piece of music is public domain doesn’t mean you can listen for free, it means you can perform it for free and people can pay YOU. Classical music subscriptions like this and IDAGIO pay the performers by the second instead of by the track so this will actually be a great service for musicians to actually be paid what they’re worth, unlike Spotify or Apple Music prior to now.I have to ask: Why do you need an Apple Music sub for this? This is just classical music, music that is free since classical music is public domain. So why should you need a subscription just to listen to public domain music you can get for free from archive.org?
If this is anything like the Primephonic app that Apple bought and shut down, I think it very much will! That app had playlists for an "introduction to..." various composers, periods, and instruments, and every track had ways to browse to further tracks with the same composer, performer, or different performances of the same piece. It also had podcast-type recordings interviewing performers about their favorite repertory, IIRC. I really hope they have these features in the new app.I don't know as much about classical as I'd like, and I'm hoping this will have some tools that help me follow a thread if I find something I want to hear more of.
What metadata is missing for pop music that would be useful? Like, are people searching for songs composed by Hillary Lindsey or something?
In any event, I don’t get the complaints about Apple Music Classical being a separate app. I haven’t seen anyone really passionate about classical complaining… it’s the people who don’t listen much who are. If you’re not into classical, or don’t listen often—don’t download the app, no harm, no foul. People who are passionate get how different classical is and why it needs a different interface.
Because classical is so different, you’d probably need to devote an entire tab button on the bottom of the main Apple Music app to the Classical interface, which would make for a much worse experience for the 95%+ of Apple Music subscribers who don’t regularly listen to Classical. Better just to segment it away.