No sane person bought a HomePod.
Thank you for your insight into my sanity
No sane person bought a HomePod.
I don't think you are (were) much of a music lover if you or think others spent far less than $ 120 a year on CDs. That would only be enough to purchase about 6 to 10 CDs.To be fair, it's not the fault of the user, 10$ a month it's 120$ a year, it's way more than what people put in CD every year even during the 2000 CD boom
So the problem is somewhere else
because you like to enjoy inferior sound quality doesn’t mean others do too
🤣. I, my mother and my sister use Apple's Family Sharing features and they do have their own Apple ID's. I invited them to family sharing but they do have their own Apple IDs and can do whatever they please. So where did you get this misinformation that one family has to use one Apple ID?I don't understand why anyone would use Apple music when family sharing requires everyone be on the same AppleID family account with one person in control of everyone's AppleID accounts.
That's a hard deal-breaker for me. Apple needs to realize that in the 21st century we have progressive families that aren't ruled by a patriarch. And many family households have multiple adults who want autonomy over their own things.
I guess Apple Music is good for people who live alone. Just like HomePod.
[automerge]1585965390[/automerge]
This logic makes no sense. So Tidal is not for you, it's also not for me, but why does their lack of success bring you great joy? Why does Tidal have such a premium space in your mind? I don't care one way or the other how Tidal is doing, I just ignore it and don't think about it.
I don't think you are (were) much of a music lover if you or think others spent far less than $ 120 a year on CDs. That would only be enough to purchase about 6 to 10 CDs.
Ability to play from a browser is a standout feature for me so no need to install a bloated app. Pretty much all the major players Spotify, Google, Soundcloud, etc. have it except for Apple Music.
I don't think you are (were) much of a music lover if you or think others spent far less than $ 120 a year on CDs. That would only be enough to purchase about 6 to 10 CDs.
That's a hard deal-breaker for me. Apple needs to realize that in the 21st century we have progressive families that aren't ruled by a patriarch. And many family households have multiple adults who want autonomy over their own things.
I still buy about 6-8 CDs per year - mainly at concerts though. If it's music I like I want to own it - not "get a license to it" to be withdrawn whenever the label gets into an argument with the providers...6 to 10 cds a year sounds like an awful lot to me! I doubt an average user gets anywhere near that. Streaming services are definitely extracting more revenue from users than previous.
I’m talking about myself. I said “me” in the post. So you can ****.because you like to enjoy inferior sound quality doesn’t mean others do too
To be fair, it's not the fault of the user, 10$ a month it's 120$ a year, it's way more than what people put in CD every year even during the 2000 CD boom
So the problem is somewhere else
Emphasis mine.A married couple can't even trust each other with a shared Apple ID? I agree the whole family sharing stuff is clunky and confusing, which is why my family just shares one single account, but this is a strange complaint.
We lived in very different worlds it seems. 20 years ago when there was no streaming, buying a CD every one or two months was nothing. One a week was more normal for people who liked music. Out of curiosity, where did you live in 2000 and how old were you?I’m not talking of myself but of the average consumer
120$ on average it’s a lot !
Not a lot of people back then bought more than 120$ of CD each year!
We lived in very different worlds it seems. 20 years ago when there was no streaming, buying a CD every one or two months was nothing. One a week was more normal for people who liked music. Out of curiosity, where did you live in 2000 and how old were you?
Spotify rightfully at #1. Don't know why anyone would use anything else.. especially Apple Music?
It’s been some time, but what I remember completely turned me off from Apple Music was that it wanted to upload all 100gb of locally stored music that I’ve accumulated over the years (a ton of rare electronic music, remixes and live DJ mixes) to an iCloud Music Library and then delete it all from local storage. I just want my own music stored locally on my phone (that’s why I bought a 256gb iPhone) and stream Apple Music tracks as desired. I only need to access it all on this one device. Don’t know why they had to make it way more complicated than it needed to be.I had a huge iTunes library that seamlessly transitioned to Apple Music. (I recall this not being true for everyone unfortunately, but that’s my experience.)
It gives me great joy to know that Tidal is in “Other.”
Spotify rightfully at #1. Don't know why anyone would use anything else.. especially Apple Music?
I tried Apple Music and no matter how many times I told it not to play pop/r&b/rap, it would always shove some random song in with its curated play list. Dropped it after 2 months and went back to Spotify.
Spotify is available on both Apple Watch and Apple TV and is integrated with Siri, you just need to say “Hey Siri, play X on Spotify”. I have used both AM & Spotify simultaneously for about 9 months and could not find a compelling enough reason to drop Spotify.
Are you foreign to the concept of statistics ?We lived in very different worlds it seems. 20 years ago when there was no streaming, buying a CD every one or two months was nothing. One a week was more normal for people who liked music. Out of curiosity, where did you live in 2000 and how old were you?
🤣. I, my mother and my sister use Apple's Family Sharing features and they do have their own Apple ID's. I invited them to family sharing but they do have their own Apple IDs and can do whatever they please. So where did you get this misinformation that one family has to use one Apple ID?