A whole 13? Wow...![]()
13 computers can be a b@st@rd to administer... Out of 50+ computers in a network, 13 computers get all my attention.
A whole 13? Wow...![]()
Lame, lame, lame.......
Apple officially leaves the Pro ring.
Who the hell will edit videos etc on a glossy screen?
Anyone notice that the Mac Pro upgrade is not even featured in the 2 top levels of the Apple web site and that you have to dig deep to find any mention of them or the new monitor.
Lame, lame, lame..........![]()
Lame, lame, lame.......
Apple officially leaves the Pro ring.
Who the hell will edit videos etc on a glossy screen?
Anyone notice that the Mac Pro upgrade is not even featured in the 2 top levels of the Apple web site and that you have to dig deep to find any mention of them or the new monitor.
Lame, lame, lame..........![]()
Actually I see this forum as becoming more like a bunch of people who are becoming indicative of the shallow Apple market that only came on board when the iPod became popular.
People who really have no clue about the origins of Apple, never used Apple in a professional capacity and have no idea how far out of touch Apple is going with regards to professional users. The users who kept Apple afloat before it became shiny and popular with the kids and soccer moms.
I'm just reading this thread and continue to be astonished. There are literally HUNDREDS of decent choices from other manufacturers to get a monitor. Here in my office, we do professional editing. We use MacPro's matched with Dell monitors.
Why would you care so much whether Apple happens to make the monitor you want ... buy one of the many other choices!
You don't sit there getting pissed off that Apple doesn't make a style of photo scanner that you want, or printer, or Apple designed desktop lamp... why are you so concerned whether Apple makes the monitor you want?
You are totally wrong in every point you made. You say, "There are literally HUNDREDS of decent choices from other manufacturers to get a monitor," but you fail to realize that nearly all IPS monitors being sold today are wide gamut. Apple was the only company today making an IPS panel that was sRGB (i.e., 72% NTSC). Wide gamut monitors are a nightmare for everything aside from Photoshop, because the colors will be too saturated, and there is no way to fix that. Most people who do not use Photoshop work in the sRGB color space. Apple's 30" display was the only 30" sRGB display, and one of the very few IPS sRGB displays of any size being sold today. The rest (i.e., the "literally HUNDREDS" that you mention) are all wide gamut.
Yup. They're tweaked for consumers who want popping colors. The red on my Dell 3007WFP is so over the top it's practically fluorescent.You are totally wrong in every point you made. You say, "There are literally HUNDREDS of decent choices from other manufacturers to get a monitor," but you fail to realize that nearly all IPS monitors being sold today are wide gamut. Apple was the only company today making an IPS panel that was sRGB (i.e., 72% NTSC). Wide gamut monitors are a nightmare for everything aside from Photoshop, because the colors will be too saturated, and there is no way to fix that. Most people who do not use Photoshop work in the sRGB color space. Apple's 30" display was the only 30" sRGB display, and one of the very few IPS sRGB displays of any size being sold today. The rest (i.e., the "literally HUNDREDS" that you mention) are all wide gamut.
Yup. They're tweaked for consumers who want popping colors. The red on my Dell 3007WFP is so over the top it's practically fluorescent.
On the other hand, if you work on web graphics or software GUIs it's good to get a sense of what it will look like on a consumer screen. It's like studio monitors for music production... the Yamaha NS-10M speakers were always very popular reference monitors and it's not because they sound great (they don't) but because they're the quintessential mediocre home stereo speakers. If you mix everything on perfect $50,000 audiophile monitors it may end up sounding like complete garbage on home stereos, clock radios and earbuds.
I'm guessing that's why people want Apple displays... a lot of 3rd party screens should come with a bucket to puke in.
Apple continues to prove that they no longer care about professionals. Oh well. It was good while it lasted.![]()
Totally agree here. If you can get your stuff to sound or look good on total POS equipment, it will sound or look good on anything.
When people are more concerned about "fashion" instead of function we know that Apple can do no wrong since who cares about CPU power, high-end graphics or anything else of actual merit so long as it's Lady Gaga fashion friendly.
BTW, there is NOTHING wrong with those other monitors' looks. I actually take more issue with Apple because they don't offer a proper matte display. Reflections are EVIL.
Professionals? Hell, they don't even care about SERIOUS computer users anymore at the consumer level, let alone professionals. The fact "the most advanced operating system in the world" is still using OpenGL 2.1 says it all, I'm afraid...but then I would be forgetting the totally crappy GPU hardware and total lack of real desktop system other than a workstation level computer.
Now this is the end of an era.... the 30" ACD was a marvelous display: a real icon... but by today's tech standards, its really outdated... for example, it still features Firewire 400 (while all current macs come with FW800) and old fashion LCD backlight.
Anyway... I hope they release a 30+ inch LED display, with higher resolutions, FW and USB, microphone, isight, speakers (although speakers are not really really critical IMO, as most Pro users choose better external speakers)... a similar Aluminum design... AND ANTIGLARE!!!
... right, keep dreaming: perhaps we're lucky enough if there's an antiglare option for the MBP line...
cheers!
Well at least the new 27" has the latest cutting edge ports, USB 2...
Can anyone point me to a decent Apple alternative, that will accept DVI input from my 2008 Mac Pro?
"They say if you put a rubber thing around it [iPhone], it works, but it didn't work for Levi Johnston"
13 computers can be a b@st@rd to administer... Out of 50+ computers in a network, 13 computers get all my attention.
As they say elsewhere on the internet, "You're doing it wrong."
Get back to me when you are managing 500+ in addition to a number of mixed OS servers.
why would they do this?
Come back to me when you're running a cluster size that big, I wasn't talking about end user computers. That's just the RHEV server cluster I maintain.
Oh please. Don't play that game. We were talking about end user computers, not clusters. Don't expect me to guess at what you are talking about or at the very least mention that you are changing the object of discussion.
Anyhow, we run vSphere.
EDIT: I see you edited your post. Talk about a change.
So if we are going to be honest the 27" is made to work with all the macbook/pro models. Basically anyone who can afford £750-£2600 (low to high spec) if an average consumer wanted to extend their 13" screen and buy an apple branded display £800 is nearly as much as their machine!! this is obserd! how many average users would buy one? i know im being optimistic by saying an average user would have the need to extend their laptop screen, but the question stands. It just wouldn't happen! Plus how many consumers would part with that much cash for a display? and not get a professionals specced screen????
Also there is no way any pro would buy a 27" glossy display (well in this pros mind anyway) they are too annoying and not what a pro wants if they are spending 8+hours a day looking at it! plus removing all choice by getting rid of a 24" that product had what a 2 year shelf life not even enough to run out one applecare warranty!
So to sum up - no choice, not applicable to pro's, too expensive for consumers, so who are these aimed at? the raving mad???
Im glad I bought a 23" cinema display when i had the chance because every other offering from apple is a joke. For my next display i hate to say il be looking elsewhere but i did like my display to fit with my mac pro... now they dont, especially when the 30" is now gone. Might just find another 23".
anyone else agree???
Because for some time, in the words of iJobs, Apple has been a "mobile device company".
"Apple Computer" is no more. Providing desktop hardware is nothing more than an inconvenience for Apple now. We've seen everything from Mac OS engineers being moved to iOS, to ****** upgrades for the MBP, almost a complete abandonment of the entry level Mac Pro, graphics cards that generally ship 1 version behind the current PC equivalents, machines that practically need replacing instead of upgrading and dozens of other niggling issues that are slowly killing their Mac business. Cutting back on Cinema Display options is another nail in the coffin for people who are impertinent enough to still buy things that aren't phones, tablets or music players. Apple couldn't simply shut down production overnight, so it's slowly making it less and less desirable to use a Mac, until no one gives a **** any more and stops buying them.
Apple had the best opportunity in its history to do serious damage to Microsoft's market share, when MS was struggling with the Vista fiasco and Mac OS X was simply stunning by comparison. Jobs didn't care, because it was never part of his plan.
I totally agree. I've been using Apple computers since 1981, and Macs since 1987. It is a shame that Apple is presently valuing form over function.