Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hating on Trump or on anyone, doesn’t make them any better then Trump.
So much for being the best country in the planet. Perhaps they should enjoy what they have built and turn the other cheek.

When hating some one politically we are then talkin about political standpoints. You think one should accept nazi sympathisers? Turn other cheek? Worked great for Jews... or maybe you learn something about history and make sure that those who want to destroy the ideals of democracy will never succeed.
 
He’s not wrong. Who’s to say it won’t happen? Look around, the world is a mess. People are suggesting to give new born children numbers instead of names, till a child is old enough to identify their own gender. Parents deciding gender for their own children, before a child even has a clue what a word “gender” means.

And don’t get me started on Walmart, we will be here all night discussing it. Yet Walmart’s app is on App Store.

If there was Earth #2 in our solar system, but opposite from ours, half the people would have left this planet, while other half would try to destroy it.

It’s a shame, so much time and energy, wasted on petty differences. Left wing, right wing, no wing, middle wing, etc.
If you like camping and beer then great. Instead, political views and affiliations, are keeping you and Bob apart from having a beer.
[doublepost=1536467294][/doublepost]

There is an Amish recipe app in Apple store. Amish women don’t have same rights as Amish men.... with in their own community.

Muslim bible apps on App Store, while Muslim women don’t have same rights as Muslim men... on US soil.

What rights don’t Muslim women have on us soil?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JayMysterio
Straw man argument: an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.

I will provide my full quote once again below in the interest of full transparency. You have taken part of what I said, which was the completely irrelevant part, and argued against that. This is a tactic commonly used by Mr. Jones’ followers. Instead of being reasonable and honest, they twist and distort. This is also a tactic commonly used by satan, the great deceiver. Coincidence? I think not. This is what I wrote and yet you did not feel necessary to fully quote because it reduces your argument to ashes once you move beyond the first sentence into the actual explanation:



You have twisted my words. You cannot deny that. Their commonality lies in the fact that they do not believe what they are preaching and in being hypocritical have found fame and/or financial incentive. It is true that each are both doing and preaching different things—but that is the irrelevant part and in no way part of my argument. Both disseminate hate and provoke violence and are therefore worthy of being ostracized from our society. Both Westboro and Jones are evil, in my opinion. Inciting violence and hatred is the way of satan, for the Bible says in Matthew 22:



If you believe that, then you cannot be a follower of Jones, for the two philosophies are in direct opposition. I say this only because Jones and many of his followers profess a Christian faith, and because as someone of Christian faith, I am sick and tired of right-wing propagandists appropriating my faith for their own financial and/or political gains. Jesus preached love all day long and yet people like Jones are working as hard as they can to tear down everything that He worked towards—the spread of love and compassion into a dark and broken world. I’m far from perfect but I don’t actively work to destroy the faith that I claim to believe in like Jones. His worldview is a very selfish one where self-preservation of culture takes precedence over actual care for others. This is the antithesis of Christianity and the ideologies could not be further apart.

I’m an anti-theist, I don’t follow Jones, and you’re deflecting being called on an unambiguously dishonest, slimy statement of sophistry.

Not even going to bother any further with someone so lacking in principle, let alone someone using theological concepts of “evil” to bolster their hollow argument supporting authoritarian means.
[doublepost=1536474365][/doublepost]

Ahhh yes, Twitter is sacrosanct, people always base public policy on s**tposting. I can’t believe this needs explaining to any thinking person.
 
Ahhh yes, Twitter is sacrosanct, people always base public policy on s**tposting. I can’t believe this needs explaining to any thinking person.


The issue isn't that the President is making policy via twitter posts but that isn't something a President should even be posting.
 
I'm just glad I live in America. If you tried to pull off what AJ has done in any other country you'd be in jail, or executed right now. Instead all that happens is he gets pulled from tech giant platforms. Could you imagine setting AJ loose in Beijing, Moscow, or Istanbul? Yea, be glad to be an American...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spendlove
Free press?

You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means............

Bolded so you can spot it.

noun
  1. a body of book publishers, news media, etc., not controlled or restricted by government censorship in political or ideological matters.
[doublepost=1536476589][/doublepost]
I'm just glad I live in America. If you tried to pull off what AJ has done in any other country you'd be in jail, or executed right now. Instead all that happens is he gets pulled from tech giant platforms. Could you imagine setting AJ loose in Beijing, Moscow, or Istanbul? Yea, be glad to be an American...

You're right you know. Not naming places but saying the wrong thing could get you in very serious trouble in other countries round the world. Trumps America is a bloody mess in some ways but at least you have freedom to speak and think.
 
b-b-but my free speech! P-p-private platforms should allow me to spew **** out of my mouth and have to host my garbage!!

Exactly! We are allowed free speech, however, People seem to forget the miranda statement: “Anything you say may be used against you in a court of law.”

Also cf. The paradox of tolerance was described by Karl Popper in 1945. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.
 
Last edited:
When liberals behave like fascists it's not fascism. These "liberal" people are self worshipers, they think they are god and when they do the same they accuse others for it's ok, because they are special. So you have the least intelligent, least educated crowd of people supporting an agenda created by a few elite people to control the world.

The globalists have done well, they have managed to make an entire generation complete idiots. Including (you).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huck and damian7777
Collectivism, socialism, its entering the USA. Guys you had a good run, but start preparing for something different.

Especially thank the FED for what they have done.
 
You make absolutely no sense what so ever. We are talking about high standard of living, good education, long life expectancy etc. That has nothing to do with homogeneous population. Even more so, you just pointed out the Norway and Sweden, countries with one of the highest standard of living in the whole world. You think it’s not working out well for them? Pay a visit, it’s working way better than you can even imagine. BTW. Norwegians hate Trump and his ideology more than any other European nation... https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/t...est-democracy-we-asked-its-people-why-n720151
I've paid a visits several times to both and have had extended conversations with citizens there. You are talking about countries with an entire population less than Los Angeles or New York City. The "literal" dirty secret of Norways prosperity is petroleum money, which even the piece you linked references, and that gives them the high standard of living and also papers over all of the generous social policies and programs. But the facade is cracking on that due to lack of assimilation of non-indigenous groups. The difference quality of life in Oslo in the last 10 years is mind boggling. As far as Sweden? The outcome of the recent election in Sweden tells you all one needs to know.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Huck
Exactly! We are allowed free speech, however, People seem to forget the miranda statement: “Anything you say may be used against you in a court of law.”

Also cf. The paradox of tolerance was described by Karl Popper in 1945. The paradox states that if a society is tolerant without limit, their ability to be tolerant will eventually be seized or destroyed by the intolerant. Popper came to the seemingly paradoxical conclusion that in order to maintain a tolerant society, the society must be intolerant of intolerance.

So then, the society collapses into itself for being unable to tolerate their own intolerance. Or else authoritarianism, not libertarianism, wins.
 
This censorship is far more troubling than any of the nonsense coming out of Infowars.

As for the "hate speech" argument, it seems to be used by liberals to include anything which goes contrary to their agenda. It's simply fascism cloaked in virtue signalling.
 
If removing AJ's drivel is seen as a form of political censorship, where can I enlist you guys to fight for pr0n being posted openly on FaceBook?

Small hint, if you want to ordinary people to believe in "conservative voices being drowned" don't use 100% nutjobs as examples.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: millerj123
Well good thing this isn't about free speech then.
[doublepost=1536457319][/doublepost]



Well 500px is up now so I can't speak on that. As for "applying them evenly", they are not the gov and not obligated to treat anyone as equal to another. It's their service to do as they please.

So when a Christian cake baker refuses to bake a cake with a slogan the baker disagrees with, you support the baker? I assume so based on your above logic.
 
So when a Christian cake baker refuses to bake a cake with a slogan the baker disagrees with, you support the baker? I assume so based on your above logic.



Are you playing this in your head that it's about freedom of speech, which it's not, or is you're argument about my comment stating "obligated to treat anyone as equal to another" which in reality is about how a corporation deals with those that break their TOS? Cause neither of which apply in regards to the situation about a Christian baker refusing service to a gay couple.
 
I've paid a visits several times to both and have had extended conversations with citizens there. You are talking about countries with an entire population less than Los Angeles or New York City. The "literal" dirty secret of Norways prosperity is petroleum money, which even the piece you linked references, and that gives them the high standard of living and also papers over all of the generous social policies and programs. But the facade is cracking on that due to lack of assimilation of non-indigenous groups. The difference quality of life in Oslo in the last 10 years is mind boggling. As far as Sweden? The outcome of the recent election in Sweden tells you all one needs to know.

I’ve lived in three Nordic countries during my life and I have to say that you are far from being correct. First of all, only Norway has oil money. However, every single one of them have extremely high standard of living and almost exactly the same social policies. There is no “facede cracking” what so ever. Difference in quality of life in Oslo in last 10 years?!? Are you joking me? Even more so if you check capitals of world based on quality of living it’s littered with Nordic capitals. Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Helsinki are all there. I would argue that the Nordic countries are actually almost as safe as they ever where even in situation in which many countries are troubled by internal and external threats. Regarding the far right in Nordics, sure it’s there but they can be described more less pathetic. Actually, in some Nordic countries their popularity has taken nose dive. Even more so, legal action has been taken against far right / neo nazi groups and they have been banned.
 
As far as Sweden? The outcome of the recent election in Sweden tells you all one needs to know.

Which "recent" election gave the outcome you are talking about? The one four years ago, or the one where the counting of the votes has not even started yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spendlove
Don’t celebrate just yet. I am not arguing that Apple does or does not have the right to do this, they are a private company that can do what they want.

HOWEVER. Ask yourself what happens when it isn’t the Alex Jones App they are removing but for example a Catholic Church App because they don’t believe women can hold the same positions as men or because of all the child molestation. Maybe they remove Facebook, Instagram snapchat apps because they have many offensive and hateful things in them.

You might be thinking “that would never happen” but we are one moral shift from exactly that happening.

Would you be celebrating then?

It's a slippery slope and worth debating. There will always be different points of view and interpretations of what is right, moral, protected, free speech, censorship, etc.

One could say that banning Alex Jones is an infringement of the 1st Amendment, and then say banning an App that glorifies Nazism is OK. Some will decide where the moral line should be drawn in the sand, and others feels that no line should ever be drawn.

You could apply that philosophy to many things. For example, I could say that restricting abortion is limiting the constitutionally protected rights of woman. You could say that restricting a certain firearm is limiting the constitutionally protected 2nd Amendment. We could argue any form of restriction on anything is an attack on our freedoms.

We could take it further and ask why have the rule of law? Who has the right to tell me I have to use my turn signal when making a left turn? I mean it's endless.

I personally feel some boundaries of accepted behavior and rule of law should be drawn. If Apple decides to ban Alex Jones it does not mean Alex Jones can no longer spew his hate or fear mongering. It's just not going to happen on Apple's Platform.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macduke
This censorship is far more troubling than any of the nonsense coming out of Infowars.

As for the "hate speech" argument, it seems to be used by liberals to include anything which goes contrary to their agenda. It's simply fascism cloaked in virtue signalling.

What censorship?

Please enlighten me to who is being censored. It isn't AJ. He broke the rules, he got kicked off a private platform.

Complete difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macduke and mudslag
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.