^ Continues to be in denial about the fact that Super AMOLED Plus is indeed better than IPS.
You aren't happy with the phone, go buy a different one.
Last edited by a moderator:
^ Continues to be in denial about the fact that Super AMOLED Plus is indeed better than IPS.
What are you actually doing for those 4.5 hours that your battery is going dead?
Browsing the web, texting, making calls, the usual.
As per the Apple Store, ~4.5 hrs of usage on one charge is normal.
I shouldn't have to change how I use my phone to get adequate battery life. Apple should work on improving the battery life to be adequate.
Sure! Just like Android does, which is why I always had to carry spare batteries with my Evo...
The standby time is variable. What matters is the actual usage time, and the usage time is far from adequate.
Atleast you have the option to carry spare batteries, to swap out when the evo dies after 4.5 hrs of usage. That's not an option for the iPhone.
You've been talking about specifications this entire time. Let me ask you this: if the specifications weren't published, and you didn't know that the iPhone 4S was "deficient" compared to the Android phones, would you complain? Is the phone unpleasant to use, or incapable of doing what you want?In what aspect is the 4s beyond competitors? It has a worse screen size, cpu clockspeed, ram, battery size and battery life than competitors. It's on par with them only in the areas of gpu and resoultion. But in most areas, it's actually behind others, not ahead.
The standby time is variable. What matters is the actual usage time, and the usage time is far from adequate.
Atleast you have the option to carry spare batteries, to swap out when the evo dies after 4.5 hrs of usage. That's not an option for the iPhone.
All I said was that Apple should respect it's customers enough to continue to deliver cutting edge products, rather than sticking with old technologies that competitors have long since left behind.
Also, you do realize the A6 is going to be 25nm?
I'm curious, where did you get this info? As far as I can tell, the latest information suggests that it'll be a 28nm process from Samsung.
The standby time is variable. What matters is the actual usage time, and the usage time is far from adequate.
My standby is 2 days and 18hours, usage 3hours and 59 minutes.
26% left right now.
Tell us your standby time and usage
The standby time is variable. What matters is the actual usage time, and the usage time is far from adequate.
My standby is 2 days and 18hours, usage 3hours and 59 minutes.
26% left right now.
Tell us your standby time and usage
You have more money than Intel and Samsung combined.
Meh... they COULD spend more money per unit and then they'd be at a cross roads... charge the carriers more and thus pass the extra costs down to us the consumer or charge the same amount as the current market price for the same units and take a bigger hit on their own bottom line. Probably the same amount of units would be sold as the current 4S so they'd just end up making much LESS money.
Any person with a primary school education should understand supply and demand.
The 4S will sell gang busters with a small but respectable update and your company will make bank.
My phone is almost always dead before I leave work at 4pm. It's fully charged over night so it's fully charged at 7am.
Today isn't a workday and the phone is already on the charger but yes, my usage time is 4.5 hrs and my standby time is less than 9 hrs. That is unacceptably low, but apparently, perfectly in line with what is to be expected according to Apple.
No, no ... it's about you, not "we".By your analogy, we ...
Standby time at 9hrs? I call BS! Standby I am almost 2 days.
If you told that to an Apple Store Genius, and they said it was normal? Don't believe you.
Browsing the web, texting, making calls, the usual.
As per the Apple Store, ~4.5 hrs of usage on one charge is normal.
I shouldn't have to change how I use my phone to get adequate battery life. Apple should work on improving the battery life to be adequate.