This is actually pretty much exactly what I wanted, an upgraded 5S, same shape, more power. Still don't think it will happen though, would be against previous. Then again, my 5S is still working great so I don't really need to upgrade.
It used to be a phone. Now it's a computer in your pocket.
What I'd really want is for Apple to release a brand new 4" iPhone 7 mini as one of the flagship models with all the features.
They are NOT going to a 32gb base.. at least until the Millions and Millions of you STOP making the 16GB a success. ... They make 32GB the base model,,, no-one,, no-one, will purchase any other size.
My mother still uses her 8Gb iPhone 4 and 16Gb iPad 4 without any complaints about a lack of storage space.
So get over yourself. 16Gb is still fine for many, many people.
I've just upgraded to a 6S after spending 3 years on a 4. I'm finding it hard to adapt as I prefer to smaller form factor.
A 4" screen is very appealing. Will see where this goes. I disabled 3D Touch in the first couple of hours so I don't mind if this new phone doesn't have it.
Original joke. Never read it before on macrumors.
Please let it be top of the line and not a "5c" type of handicapped device....
It just goes to show how frivolous a feature 3d Touch is, if the most authoritative and accurate analyst predicts that the new iPhone will not have it.
As to the 4" iPhone, this is welcome news. It really should be as fast as the larger models, though.
Well, if you refer to core app, even if you don't use it (i don't use Stock or Wallet for instance), as bloatware, you should take a look at some Android devices ...The core apps you cannot delete and need to hide in a folder. There is a bunch of em.
Every OS has them, and most refer to them as bloat ware. Newest example being the news app. No choice to install it.
I'd rather wish they'd reduce the bezels to make the screen an even 6".Why can't Apple just make the phones more compact and get rid of extra bezel space.
Almost everything in any business the bigger size product has better everything. Get over it.
As I noted above... this isn't about whether or not people can get by with 16GB, but about the *OVERALL* user experience having a 16GB model produces and the long-term impact on the Apple brand.
In other words, Apple is being stupidly-short-sighted by starting the line-up at 16GB. It creates a negative user-experience far more costly to the brand than the extra profits they make through the up-sell.
Marked. So what will you give me when if actually happens?Mark my words....This will never happen.
Why is your iPhone 5 tired? Mine seems to be full of energy, almost as if it snorted some coke."soon my tired little iPhone 5, you can rest"
*strokes phone gently*
Typical! My iPhone 5 is dying so bit the bullet and ordered a 64GB 6S even though I find them too big. Buying a 5S at this point would have been silly as it's so out of date. A new 4" one would have been perfect for me. Looks like 6S til Spring, then sell and swap for this new one.
This whole idea of holding back a feature to keep it differentiated is so retarded. Differentiated? I kinda think the fact that it's 4 inches and not 4.7 or 5.5 is the differntiation. Oh yea, and the fact that it would be an entirely different design.
Besides, I'm pretty sure that aside from a big batch of folks on places like macrumors here, the rest of the 'real' world mostly doesn't give a damn about '3D touch'.
it'd be nice if they wouldn't penalize people who like smaller form factors by removing functionality & power.
If a user has an iPad Air 2 for a couple years, and realizes the mini would be a more convenient and useful size for them, they're going to eat hundreds dollars on depreciation getting rid of their Air 2, only to spend a load of $ on a smaller iPad that has... the same hardware as an Air 2. Result is paying loads of money for a new device, but getting last years hardware only smaller. Tough sell.