Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This makes no sense to me from a purely technical aspect:

"Apple is reportedly asking component makers to prepare enough parts for up to 120 million iPhone 6 models in order to compensate for high failure rates". (due to screen failures, according to the original NYT article)

You don't order extra devices like this, you expect suppliers to provide a certain yield (quantity made less failures, sometimes a high failure rate) to meet your purchase orders. Apple doesn't care if they have to make 200M to get 100M good ones, they only care about yield. Apple or any supplier would never put a product in the field with a 30% plus failure rate.

I think its a journalist that's a bit out of his element.
 
Your gonna need bigger pockets...

Jeans manufacturers get your new ads in now - plus size pockets available on all styles. Levis 501 come in normal and oh my god is that an iPhone in your pocket or are you .....
 
if these mockups resemble a real iPhone even a little bit... why didn't Apple put an even bigger screen in the 5.5 version. You can EASILY fit a 6 inch screen in that monster without changing the phone dimensions AT ALL!!!
 
Last edited:
I've questioned it since the beginning, it's not something Apple does by introducing different screen sizes in one launch.

Also take a look at the image in this article.
Image

Look at the distance between the bottom of the screen and the home button on all 3. Using 5s as the control, you can see 4.7 is making use of the available real estate by making things tighter - the screen is closer to the button. This way you keep the actual phone size as small as possible (something Apple does consistently, keeping the phone thinner and smaller). Then you get to the 5.5, and all of a sudden we have extra room to spare? With more distance between the button and the bottom of the screen? Not only that, the button isn't even centered between the bottom of the phone and the bottom of the screen. Apple/Ive/any designer would not allow something as important as the home button to not be centered, especially when there are barely any elements on the front to begin with.

Older straight on shot from this article.
Image

Every single iPhone button is centered between screen and bottom:
Image

I believe the note at the bottom of the picture provided says mockup...
 
Prices need to be $600-650 for the 32 GB version off contract. Most likely they will charge $850 for the 32GB 5.5 off contract.


$850 for a phone.


Ok Apple you talked me into it. Give me that 5.5".

Sells for $850, costs $250 to manufacture.

<insert standard excuse>
There's more to it than the cost for the component materials. There's employees that need to be paid, and R&D to fund.
</insert standard excuse>

Yet Apple is the most profitable company in the industry, making so many billions they don't know what to do with it other than giving dividends.
 
Depressing how many people want the 5.5" monstrosity on the first page, sigh.

Each to their own I guess, i'm currently feeling as out of touch as those people who like to watch celebrity gossip programs and glitzy karaoke contents on tv.
 
Can't wait to hear how Ive will explain that you'll need two hands to operate such a big phone. :cool: How will he bs his way out of it? :rolleyes:

It's not simply bigger.

We have unapologetically taken the elements that made the iPhone 5 so amazing and re-imagined them into an even more enhanced experience.
 
But I thought "the next big thing is already here"??? That sure is a lot of units for a device that's just supposed to be playing catchup with Samsung. It's almost as if Samsung is.... not the next big thing. :cool::D

The recent adverts prove without any doubt that Samsung is ******** themselves. Apple isn't going to stop selling 4" phones. These 70 to 80 million iPhones will mostly be lost sales for Samsung. Their sales and profits have been dropping already, probably in anticipation of Apple's new phones. Who would want a phone that associates you with the company making the nastiest adverts, when you can buy an iPhone?
 
If these rumors are true then we should have seen some 5.5" iPhone 6 parts leaks by now. I'm not believing there will be a 5.5" phone until I see some parts leaks like the ones for the 4.7" iPhone 6.
 
All the 5.5' needs is this:

Kopia%20av%20ACE%20SKATEBOARD%20TRUCK%2022%20High%20Copper.jpg


...and this :

t19-medorra-skate-wheels-3.jpg


...and you get the iSkate!
 
Sells for $850, costs $250 to manufacture.

<insert standard excuse>

</insert standard excuse>

Yet Apple is the most profitable company in the industry, making so many billions they don't know what to do with it other than giving dividends.

1. Unless you have not a clue how real life works, you'd know that it's quite normal to have manufacturing costs around one third of retail price. Look in the mirror. Your shoes, your trousers, your shirt, your watch, your glasses, your socks, they all have about the same ratio of manufacturing cost to retail price. BTW, same for the mirror that you are looking at.

2. Giving dividends _is the purpose_ of a publicly traded company. They are supposed to make profit and either reinvest that profit or pay dividends.
 
About blooming time...jeez Apple what have you been doing for the past few years..I like many others will be dumping the 4s to get the 5.5 :)
 
Apple always finds a way to BS its way out of things..... I'm cringing at the thought of his dumb promo video where he back pedals just like the rest of the Apple fanboys. :)

My point exactly ^^ Somehow it'll turn out you never wanted anything smaller than a 4.7'' iPhone.

BS would imply there is zero reason to own a bigger phone? There are many reasons people would want to own a bigger phone.

However, could you imagine a 4.7" iPhone 4 in 2010 - it would've been a brick. Way too think for that size and the amount of glass involved would've made it so heavy too.

Even Android manufacturers have slowly increased screen sizes year by year. They didn't just jump to 5" - as phones have gotten thinner they have slowly gotten bigger too. But that is one of the strengths of Android from the start - because of the way apps scaled it allowed for yearly size increases without devs needing to do any/much work to support new screen sizes. Apple has taken another route. Keeping a stricter set of resolutions and in the long run it has allowed the App Store to flourish. Apps are still mostly launched on iOS first and are generally regarded to be better quality.

Personally I don't want a bigger phone, but looks like if I want to stay with iOS in the future I'm going to have to get a 4.7" minimum. For me it sucks, I like the way I can easily use my 5s with one hand. But there are definitely a chunk of smartphone users (iOS and Android) that have been waiting for a larger iPhone.

Both of you need to stop listening to Apple and Android fanboys and realise in the wider world away from internet forums there are people who want a whole variety of hardware and software. And no one company will meet everyone's needs.

Apple doesn't have to BS anyone, people will buy what they release because it will fit their needs, regardless of what Jonny Ive says. Not to mention they'll probably be selling last years 4.0" models alongside the new batch.
 
I don't get this. Your post needs some explaining.

I'm going to take a wild guess and suggest that Dades was intimating that there are far more important things happening in the world currently to get "depressed" over, instead of the fact that people want larger screened smartphones...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.