Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
"should" being the operative word.

Lately Apple's product releases have been less than underwhelming. Many of "us" are hanging on for something to really cheer about. Were it not for the eco system stickiness and lack of visionary alternatives, we'd jump ship long ago.
Alas, we're in the Jobs-less era again. Rhymes on a theme is all the iPhone 7 is.

I'm reminded of the famous 1984 Mac commercial, with the grey faceless crowd following the Orwellian overlord on the big screen. Back then, it was the IBM/MS sheeple, now it's Apples turn to be subverted by a new disruptor.
http://theconversation.com/from-disrupter-to-disrupted-apple-could-be-next-59525
That has always been the inevitable cycle of things. The rebels invariably become part of the system or the system itself. Those who go against the establishment become part of that establishment or replace it. There's no way to break the rules without also creating new rules in the process.

That said, I am interested to see what Apple can accomplish when it is at the height of its power, with all the wealth and influence at its disposal. Should be fun to watch.
 
Forgot to remind you that streaming over speakers or wireless headphones should be added to list of the many easy options that the 200 million people who Will buy the iPhone 7 will use as they chant: 2, 4, 6,8 who do we appreciate? Apple!

Which was completely impossible with all previous IPhones that had a headphone jack...
 
I can't wait for Apple to remove the 3.5 jack from everything. Apparently there are a lot people who will buy other phones/tablets/computers, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
Minor fixable issue. Minor issue, if it's even an issue at all. Issue that occurs every launch.

Way to go Greymacuser.

Yes you can say "minor issue", but frankly the headphone/adapter issue is a real head scratcher. The importance of the removal of the headphone jack was certainly not lost on Apple, yet this points to yet another poorly thought out issue that should have been caught before these phones hit the street. Something as obvious as this also expresses a kind of casual nonchalance which suggests Apple really didn't care about the customers who would be affected by the jack's removal. Seriously didn't anybody actually use the Lightning EarPods with a new iPhone to test it out, or did they just plug it in, confirmed it worked and moved on to the next thing?

Maybe this was the result of a last minute tweek to the iOS 10 release and Apple knew about the problem but didn't want to miss the launch date. But considering the removal of the headphone jack, Apple certainly didn't need any more bad press surrounding that decision, and that's exactly what they got.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huperniketes
Which was completely impossible with all previous IPhones that had a headphone jack...

You've got to read the thread. The issue was how many different solutions are there to listening to music and charging at the same time. The list is so long, I forgot a couple in the first post.
 
You're complaining on something that there's no going back on. What's the point!?

Disagree that there's no going back.

I think you were heard when that dongle was free in the box? The fidelity of that jack wasn't very hot, btw - this path leads to even better sounding headphones with built in DAC. But I'd like to see AirPlay headphones show up, to be honest.

Nonsense, the fidelity of a 3.5 jack is as good as anything else that's available. Lightning headphones have the potential to have better DAC and they have the potential to have worse DAC. I'm still waiting to hear a definitive test on sound quality with the new adapter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jwdsail
29641769451_3c14275294_o.png
 
You're complaining on something that there's no going back on. What's the point!?
The point is, people will realize that there are equally good and less expensive options out there that have the headphone jack and they will move. There is going back.
[doublepost=1474391543][/doublepost]
It will be around, just not in mobile devices.
Keep dreaming fanboy... You do realize other companies will continue making phones with a headphone jack right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: huperniketes
Better yet, why don't you ask Apple to just publish all the bugs we write against their software, and run quality metrics on the data to see how bad it's become over the last few years? Such bug data analysis is very common for mature software companies.

I would welcome such an open system and even agree to be publicly identifiable on the bugs I've opened during the last 15 years. But Apple will never agree to such visibility. If their quality is so great, what do they have to hide? They're the ones spewing drivel at this point.

uh. really? an open system on bugs? publicly available?? since when does ANY company do this? and why on earth would they? do you think apple does not do 'bug data analysis'?...?...??? lol.

'mature companies'. your pedantic ignorance is laughable man.

it's gotten worse in the last few years because their user base has grown by orders of magnitude -- they've pioneered several platforms and developer frameworks...

get a grip people.
 
'If you don't like it, don't buy it' is a typical response people make when they do not have a good valid argument. Its like saying if you don't like this country move to some other country.
 
Just for your information: In the video posted by votdfuk (aka wtf :) ) it was stated: "There is no room here to include a dac and an amp of any quality". He could be right, he could be wrong.

Here is a video that shows that there is at least a DAC (of unknown quality) in the adapter (lightning to 3.5mm):
 
What he fails to point out is how it compares to the DAC/amp in the iPhone itself (apart from stating the 24/16 bit difference which is completely irrelevant).
 
The above three posters have no idea how complex software development is. Apple likely knew about this bug and had a fix in testing already.

Case in point...
Facebook is written in PHP (actually a fork of it now). Each month, a new version of PHP is released that has many bug fixes, some of which were first added to the bug database many years ago, and they've remained in the bug database this whole time because other issues were more important, or a fix just wasn't possible until now. Apple's software development is the same... bugs are identified, a ticket is created, solutions are discussed and tested, and only when they are ready do they get released to the public.

There's always going to be bugs to fix. Even if something worked one day, something else may break it, so a fix is needed. These are Apple's first Lightning-based EarPods, so bugs are bound to exist.

This isn't about defending Apple. It's about being realistic that software (and hardware) development is a complex process that doesn't always go perfectly or on schedule. Every leaf that gets turned over reveals more bugs that may have otherwise remained hidden and unknown. Switching to Lightning was a big leaf!
I'm a computer science student and worked for a QA team as intern, shipping products with these kind of bugs isn't the norm.
Obviously there will always be bugs, but this is a pretty big one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huperniketes
What he fails to point out is how it compares to the DAC/amp in the iPhone itself (apart from stating the 24/16 bit difference which is completely irrelevant).

iPhone 7 hearing test: Audio adapter can amplify noise
Iphone7_audio-adapter-d85dbe60cc01df23.jpeg@jpg

Image: c't

Apple's new audio adapter for the Lightning port on the iPhone 7 is a major bone: In precise listening tests we found other peculiarities of the D / A converter out, which can lead to more noise.

After last Friday initially the signal quality of the new Lightning Audio Adapter measured and with the internal audio jack of the iPhone 6s and iPad Air had compared, we have the adapter now open and made more hearing tests to analyze the sound characteristics more precisely.


Behind the Lightning connector Apple has built a Lightning chip with the identifier "338S00140 0KR1618 TW". He is responsible for the communication via the Lightning port and brings its own D / A converter unit according to our experience to date with. lie on the analog signals for stereo headphones and microphone for use of headsets to the four-pole 3.5mm jack socket of the adapter.

D / A converter is not operating linear
The built-in converter has some unusual properties that are dependent on whether it is connected to an iPhone or iPad. Metrologically he reached over the built-in socket inferior dynamics. The is 99.6 dB (A) on iPhone and 102.9 dB (A) at the iPad still always better than what is commonly known as "CD quality" describes internal sockets of the iPhone 6S and the iPad Air supplied with 104.1 dB (A) and 106.7 dB (A) but significantly better values that compete with those better professional audio interfaces entirely.


Under a microscope, the inscription of the Lightning chips in audio adapter is visible: 338S00140 0KR1618 TW.His exact specifications are still unknown to us.Image: c't

In hearing test, however, showed that the converter in the Lightning adapter dynamism not exploited because he does not work in contrast to the internal transformer of the iPhone and iPad at the lower end of the volume spectrum linearly. So he is in the listening test level with about -86 dBFS roughly as loud as level of -120 dBFS.

The effects are similar to those of a very low set parallel compressor. So you can hear extremely quiet signals with the adapter though, these are compressed beyond a certain threshold, however, so one perceives no difference in volume.This, however, is for example, a commonly used 16-bit recording dithering noise louder to hear than to the internal audio jack of the iPhone 6S and iPad Air. Their converters operate even in the lower volume range linearly, so that signals well beyond -86 dBFS be quieter.So we could with a low in-ear headphones (Beyerdynamic DTX-100, 12 ohms) hearing level to about -95 dBFS on iPhone 6S and -102 dBFS on iPad Air and perceive differences in volume.In other headphone models these perceptible level may be different.

When comparing the perceived loudness of normal pop songs we could despite the metrological level differences on the adapter and on the internal sleeve, however make no obvious volume differences, whether with in-ear headphones with 12 ohms or a headset with 70 Ohm ( Sennheiser HD-25).

Frequency response and distortion are exemplary at both the internal connectors and the adapter.


Conclusion
Apple Lightning audio adapter reinforced by our listening tests signals are quieter than about -86 dBFS. This may cause some shots a little more noise is noticeable, for example when analog tape recordings have been used or if a 16-bit music file - dithered - often as usual in mastering.

Listeners can only notice this, however, when they pointed their ears, use high-quality headphones with high efficiency or if they connect the audio adapter to a stereo system or powered speakers using the line input. This listener can understand this even at home, the computer magazine c't is in its upcoming issue 21/16, which appears on October 1, publish corresponding Test files to download.

In everyday life, when a user to listen to MP3 or AAC files with already highly compressed pop or rock music, but it will not notice the difference. was heard from developers circles that manufacturers now working on higher-quality audio adapters for the Lightning connector, which should also provide audiophile users satisfied. With the removal of very good internal audio jack on the iPhone 7 Apple can here the demand for such high-quality external converters quite stimulating. ( Hag )
 
Can you please buy an Android phone and not come back here? Trying to follow this thread and your comments are annoying, if other grass is greener you are free to move.
I use both and willl continue to browse this forum. Don't like it don't reply and move along.
 
  • Like
Reactions: huperniketes
So basically you're following exactly his advice like he suggested. You don't have to defend any company or any product. Just move on. You said it yourself: life is too short.

But for those of us who'd like to embrace a different direction for the future than others, that's our choice too to stay with Apple.
Problem is, the alternatives suck a lot more.

So yes I will voice my opinion and hope they get the wake up call.

I have some hope seeing how they made the iPhone SE a thing.

Glassed Silver:ios
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.