Thank you for doing this bit of research. I for one found it helpful.
Now to answer your question, I would say that two things are wrong with Apple, going solely on the basis of your search there.
1. The comparison is with Dell. I would never consider buying something from Dell, and I would advise any one else likewise. So, if you must compare with Dell, something is already wrong there. (Just to be clear, I would begin by looking for a local build-to-order shop, and make sure that I have a good conversation with whomever would put the thing together. Not for everyone, I know, but I cannot for the life of me figure out why I'd want to buy my computer at a shopping mall or a best buy, either.)
2. Dell, for all its obvious flaws, does offer other options besides the iMac wannabe. Apple only offers two other options, the mini and the pro. And when you expand your choices beyond Dell, it grows even more. To finish off this point, the main reason why you don't see more choices is that Apple actively discourages other companies from installing OSX on their wares; but if this ridiculous situation continues, whereby Apple refuses to meet the obvious needs of the computing community, then alternatives should emerge. These alternatives include psystar-type shops, online efforts a-la osx86, or linux--as well as other things that we can't think of today, but which people will think up if given enough time and incentive.
Now, there is another thing that I object to, and I wish others here would start to care about this: how this sort of scheme shuts out people who are not as financially well off as some of us. I have seen so many replies in threads like these that dismiss the needs of anyone who can't afford a mac pro, or who refuses to settle for these other inferior choices.
Yet this elitism is not even well founded in a technological sense. There have been hundreds of posts in this very thread praising the design of this iMac (when it has trouble with basic cooling because of a rather useless attempt to make it skinny), its fast speed (when it has a RAM ceiling of 4 GB), its cpu (nothing special, specially since today is as cutting-edge as this model is going to get, then it will sit on the shelves for months until the next upgrade), its obviously inferior glossy display (thankfully, you see the problem there) ... so, as I read these posts, I say to myself "damn, these Apple users are lacking in clues".
The computing world is much larger than Apple pretends it is, and we as users are not well served by that constraint.
Now, you did not address what I said about linux. When all your friends are running linux because they'd rather keep an extra $1000 in their pocket and Ubuntu is pretty good, are you still going to enjoy OSX so much? Or would you enjoy your computer more if your friends went with OSX as well?
I sense that plenty of posters in this thread don't give a damn about such communal issues, but I do. If Apple keeps downgrading the hardware until only the well-moneyed clueless--or the Mac Pro types, like myself--still want their hardware, then as a communal, and computing, experience, using Apple is going to start to suck.
I hope this trend reverses in time, but it's beginning to look like it will not. I guess a lot is riding on what they do with the mini.
Finally, consider what happened when OS X came out. Linux users switched en masse to this cool new version of unix, knowing that the problem of searching for hardware drivers would be over. Furthermore, Apple made a point of playing nice with the open software communities back then. With each successive "upgrade", all the premises in this paragraph continue to go in the wrong direction; for a particularly crass example, look at how Apple makes it impossible to play flac files within iTunes. If Apple loses a critical mass of those linux users, then you can rest assured that it will lose its image as a maker of good--if slightly pricey--hardware, and it will be replaced with an image closer to what it had in its pre-Unix era.
Hi,
Replying to your first comment, I made this comparison simply because of 2 facts.
1.)Apple is a computer company, so is Dell.
2.)Dell has the closest offering to compare iMac to, the XPS one. Sony does have Vaio LT, which is way more advanced in HTPC area, and more expensive.
I do not agree with you Dell being a bad brand, I'm using an Inspiron 8600 laotop for 3.5 years now and beside the fact tha it had never failed me, I upgraded RAM, Optical Drive, added Bluetooth and even upgraded my CPU from Pentium-M 725 (1.6Ghz) to Pentium-M 765 (2.1Ghz). Dell was kind enough to publish the service manual online. The only thing that I can complain is the quality of materials used for the enclosure and overall bad worksmanship. But my needs of a computer changed, so I want my next computer to be a MBP.
Now the Apple question. Apple is beyond a computer manufacturing company. It's a design studio focusing on computer technology related product, designing elements not only visually (Mac), but also functionally. (OSX). Dell on the other hand is focusing on manufacturing computer to sell to masses, design is merely a focus point.
Apple does everything in house. Hardware and software. Surely Apple wants more people to use their products, but Apple also has two philosophies that it will never forget. Their products have to be well designed and exclusive and their performance has to be remarkably good. Yes iMac is an all in one, yes Mac Pro is way too expensive for a normal consumer and yes if Apple makes an entry level Tower/SFF, many people would buy it. Why don't they do it?
Because Apple brand should be exclusive, at leaset more exclusive than Dell, Sony, Toshiba, HP etc. Because Apple believes an average customer won't need a tower with all the cables, they simply need a computer that just works and eveything is embedded.
You, as a power user, have a major problem with this. You want to upgrade, change and customize your machine, that's fine, but this is just not in the mainstream idea of Apple. There is nothing you can do but going the Linux or Windows way for that.
Think of Apple as an exclusive restaurant with an exclusive dish and exquisite atmosphere. That exclusive dish (OSX) has a recipe and everybody wants to have it, but the restaurant does not allow it to be out in the wild, they simply say: "You can come and eat any time!". Some people complain that they live far, they cannot come to the restaurant and they say that they want to order via phone or take out the food to eat at home. Restaurant managers believe that the food and the atmosphere are one thing that cannot be seperated. And you critisize them because that do not offer the recipe, or take out options. That's fine, then do not eat here, but don't mock people of by pointing out how expensive the food is, or how there are more delicious food that is very similar but costs less. Everybody is coming to this restaurant because they love it. You know it's good, too, but simply it's too hard for you to come to the restaurant or the food is way too expensive, and that's why you try to convince people that there are other alternatives, too. But you do not have to push people. (That was a long example, but I hope you get my point)
iMac is a fast computer. The speeds of processors are higher than it's competitors. You say 4GB RAM limit, I say 2GB is enough for today. You want more, here is Mac Pro supporting 32GB. Display is inferior, I give you that. There are more responsive, brighter displays out here, and apple was lacking to update even the ACD line. But that's it. As an all-in-one, iMac is a very good computer, and resaonably priced, too.
OSX is a great operating system. So it Ubuntu, so is Windows XP. But there is one thing OSX has that no other system has. It simply works without giving you a questionmark in your head what to do next. Every task is done so simple, that even a person with no history of computer usage can start using it in 10 minutes. Nothing to setup, nothing to tweak, nothing to adjust. This is where Apple shines. There are peple who spend 199 USD on a 1GB GeForce 6200 card with 64 bit memory bus, just because it has one gigabytes of ram so it must be fast. For there kind of people, Mac is an oasis on a desert.
Right now Apple is focused on the huge mass who don't know much about computer technology. It might lost the focus on the power users, but this doesn't meat that they are going to continue like this.