Hmm. iTunes VoiceOver via Windows version has vastly more natural voice without any of the 'clipping' that the Mac voice has. Hope Snow Leopard comes with better voices...
I thought the same thing!
Either way the voices are kind of creepy.
Hmm. iTunes VoiceOver via Windows version has vastly more natural voice without any of the 'clipping' that the Mac voice has. Hope Snow Leopard comes with better voices...
The above is my reaction.
Yeah I understand that. but that is for one song. so for multiple songs do you have to click it three times each? ie six clicks for two songs?
Here we go again thinking that MacRumors is a true representation of Apple product buyers. If Apple catered for what we wanted, it would be such a niche market that Apple would disappear up its own backside.
Next time you're on a train, look around you. The majority of iPod users stick with their supplied 'phones. Their loss, and I feel for them, but these are the majority who influence Apple's strategies, not us.
not bad...interesting...these are good for kids
Wake up and smell the coffee you complainers. It's an ipod SHUFFLE - it's not the top of the line beast meant for connecting and controlling and customizing etc.
If you don't like the shuffle and want other earbuds/headphones, do one or more of the following:
1: Buy the old one. It's still just as good as it was yesterday.
2: Buy a nano (it's actually really small, and even has a screen)
3: Buy something from another manufacturer og an other ipod
4: Just shut up and accept the realities.
Apple has ADDED another item to their list of ipods. If you don't want it, it doesn't affect you AT ALL. I know they will be discontinuing the old shuffle in the future, but now you know, and you can buy one during the next weeks/months if you prefer that one. It's not like the mac pro where the old one was ripped away without warning.
I agree. I have a pair of studio ear buds that were twice the price of the shuffle and if I cannot use them I will not buy the shuffle. I want the shuffle for the gym as the 2GB was to small in storage (I work out a couple of hours a day and that is not enough to store my jazz collection for working out). Without the ability to use my own headphones this is a non-starter. What is Apple thinking? How many people do you know that use the stock, uncomfortable Apple ear buds? Not many in my neck of the woods! They sound like garbage (relatively speaking) and do fit in every ear. I guess I am waiting for Apple to release a $20 adapter that allows for use of your own headphones.
I am seriously disappointed in the direction Apple has taken recently. Why give consumers LESS choice when using your product that more? Oh well - I guess I keep using the larger Nano and while it works well enough it does not meet the size requirements.
My son has been saving up his birthday money and allowance for almost 6-months to get an iPod and the Shufle is not large enough in capacity to keep his music files for long trips and the headphones are a NON STARTER for my son OR daughter as they do not fit in their ears properly and my daughter need earphones due to a hearing issue. The Nano is more expensive that he can afford and larger than he would like (not to mention the cost associated with the Nano - as these are children so it is not inconceivable it would be lost or damaged). A real disappointment - I am sure I will be labeled as someone who has no forethought and should live with it and buy something else - that seems to be the MO on these forums lately. If you do not like something Apple releases you are nothing but an ill-informed curmudgeon. Sad, really sad. I have already started to see this attitude during this thread already - and there are only two pages of comments!
D
No they are not as ANYONE so exercises can tell you the stock headphones will make you stop the workout because they FALL OUT ALL THE TIME! This is the worst idea from Apple since I have been on this forum. What a colossal bone-headed move! It is clear those who designed this have NEVER WORKED OUT or they would have passed on this! Also - I use my 2G shuffle in the car, how do I change songs through my tape adapter? Oh, that's right - I CANNOT!
D
I agree with some of what you're saying. For some the headphones requirement will be annoying (although hopefully there are still enough old shuffles around to get one now!).
However its not Apple's job to make one of every type of MP3 player possible - its a bit silly to complain to Apple if your specific requirements aren't met. And it is specific - lots of storage, small size (have you SEEN how small a Nano is by the way?!) and a very low price. It's not true that you can't have everything - but you can't expect Apple to make it all.
I'm not convinced by this new Shuffle. It's got form, but I think it may lack function. Like many others in this thread, I use aftermarket headphones (the Apple earphones fall out when running) so this device would be useless for me. I'll stick with my 2nd gen for now.
Here we go again thinking that MacRumors is a true representation of Apple product buyers. If Apple catered for what we wanted, it would be such a niche market that Apple would disappear up its own backside.
Next time you're on a train, look around you. The majority of iPod users stick with their supplied 'phones. Their loss, and I feel for them, but these are the majority who influence Apple's strategies, not us.
Triple-click to go back a song, same as on the iPhone. The iPhone 3G already has a little clicker on the headphones.
it would be so easy to put a minijack on the controls... SO EASY.
It is more expensive yet you get LESS features. Look what's missing:
* Go to PREVIOUS SONG
* SKIP BACKWARDS of same song
* GO FORWARDS in same song
Not necessary? Ever listened to a mash up from a DJ like tecno, trance, dance or something like that? It's usually a mix lasting for an hour or so... how would I navigate through that? Not I guess..
Also, I find the mini jack output a bit nasty. The only reason it's there is so you can buy the more expensive Apple In-Ear buds.. there is no other product you can use with the new Shuffle.
Oh and for the design "slash" usability: when I'm at fitness or running outside, I usually put the cord UNDERNEATH my clothing, not on top. How am I going to use those controls when it's beneath my clothing? Using TelepathyOver?
What has gotten into Apple lately? Is there a correlation between not having Jobs present at the moment and the release of the underpowered iMac and a bit weak Mac Mini upgrade that is more expensive and this, in my view, downgraded product?
This is dying for touch controls on the blank surface. Swipe up and down for volume and taps to navigate. It would suit their touch philosophy and be way better than the buds control (they're pretty muh just as accessible)
Way to be dismissive.
What about those of us with young children have been saving their allowance for months to get an iPod but the Apple earbuds are too large and uncomfortable for their 8 year olds? Now they have to get an adapter in order to use earbuds that fit or save for a few more months to get a nano that they do not need the capacity of.
I know it is not an essential purchase, but an 8 year old daughter saving $50 for this purchase was an accomplishment. Now she has to wait even longer, turning this into a possible negative lesson for her.