Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Can you please explain to me how these 'serious' Wifi issue occur.

If I could the issues would probably be fixed already. There're numerous reports about WiFi issues along with iOS 8.x and OS X 10.10.x in this and other forums.

I for myself experienced only milder forms of issues, like iOS devices crashing the whole WLAN and the inability to connect my Macs to the WLAN. Luckily they used to happen only randomly at my home. Others don't have so much luck.

But there are still unfixed interoperability issues between AirPort Time Capsule (802.11ac), iOS devices (Apple TV, iPad, iPad Air) and Macs (Mini 2012+2014, Air 2013+2014). Same devices didn't have any issues with predecessor software.

It'll be interesting to see how the new iPhone accessory called "Apple Watch" will behave under these circumstances.
 
I agree. 2.8 million watches is way too low. There will be a waiting line (virtual and physical) that will be quite surprising.

On another note, folks are hung up way too much on battery life. My hunch is the Apple folks know who their target audience is on this one.

Water resistant is a given. Water proof unnecessary.

Folks will have two chargers: one at home; on at work. When at work, on the computer, the watch will be charging; when it's time for the meeting, on goes the watch; when it's time to go to the gym, on goes the watch; when it's time to drive home; on with the watch.

When home, the watch will be charging; no need to wear the watch when surfing the net on the iPad or doing work on a laptop/desktop.

Agreed, people are going to go crazy for this.
 
Didn't a rumour say new iPods and a new Apple TV would launch in March? Bring on March then! :D
 
So many downers on here

I find it amazing that so many people have suddenly determined that their most mission critical tasks just happen to fall outside the range of the Apple Watch.

  • When did sleep tracking become an absolute essential requirement?
  • Who knew there were so many deep sea explorers in the market for smartwatches?
  • How do so many MacRumors readers find time for a 4+ hour workout everyday?
The first generation Apple Watch has been designed as a companion to the iPhone, to be used in similar environments and timeframes. It is made to be a consummate connected tool with a high end screen and the ability to provide wearable connected information. If you have extreme needs that fall outside these parameters, you will need to either purchase a specialized device that is currently able to cover that narrow spectrum, or you will have to wait for the second or third generation of Apple Watch to include them in it's more comprehensive pallette of functionality.



I just want a macbook air with retina display.

There already is a MacBook Air with retina display - - it's called the MacBook Pro.

(The 13" MBP weighs only half a pound more than the 13" MBA, and that minor weight difference is accounted for by the larger battery needed to drive the high-res screen.)
 
I'm really interested in the specs of the 12" MBA, and what will happen with their existing lineup. I think there's enough questions surrounding the MBA, that won't be answered until Apple provides the details, i.e., ports, using A8 processor or intel, etc.

As for the watch, I predict it will be very popular, mostly because of the fruit logo, but I think the battery life is its biggest flaw - at least for the moment. Until that gets into people's hands, we'll really not know its strengths and weaknesses.
 
Not to be a party pooper, but I'm just not interested in these devices. I really wish apple would listen to people on this site and continue developing their desktop line up and focus on making Mac OS 10 as great as it can be. That's what the mac experience is really all about. ��

Well, Apple are all about the post-PC era. So I can't see them allocating too many resources to OS X and Mac. These new product categories and mobile devices are what the market is demanding.
 
Two were wrong because they aren't proprietary connectors, they are industry standard connectors. It has been more than a decade since Apple last sold a Mac with any proprietary connector. They only use industry standard ones.



FireWire operated at 400Mbps in 1994. USB 1.0 came out two years later, and was only capable of 1.5Mbps.

As far as I know, Apple was the first major PC manufacturer in the world to ship hardware with USB ports, but being hundreds of times slower than FireWire meant it simply could not compete.

Even today, FireWire is still faster than USB although the performance gap is much smaller now.

HDMI 1.2 and earlier have a maximum display resolution of 1920x1200,. Apple has been selling screens with higher resolution than that for more than ten years, but HDMI could not drive large displays until version 1.3 of the spec which still pretty rare among PC hardware today. That is why Apple never supported the HDMI standard.

MicroUSB only has five pins, and older iOS/iPods required 30 pins - there were no unnecessary pins on the 30 pin connector. Modern iOS devices have more powerful software and are able to send things (like video) digitally instead of over an analogue connection, so they only require 8 pins... but that's still to many to use a MicroUSB connector.

Thunderbolt is very similar to FireWire, it's essentially a newer version of the same thing. Where FireWire maxes out at 800Mbps, Thunderbolt currently does 10,000Mbps and is expected to hit 100,000Mbps in future (according to Intel that speed can be done now, but it's too expensive to be made available to the public).


They are more expensive because they do things that USB is not capable of doing.



Agreed. But there is no good alternative, either Apple needed to use proprietary connectors or produce inferior products with less features (eg, lower resolution screens that work with HDMI, video cameras that take hours to transfer short video clips over USB 1.0 instead of seconds with FireWire, iPods that don't have analogue video output cables to play video on your TV, etc)

But USB 3.1 changes all that, it increases the speed to be the same as Thunderbolt, more than 10x faster than FireWire, and it can drive high resolution displays the same as HDMI 1.3, and it can do 100 watts of power in both directions, and it's also dirt cheap when you're just plugging in a keyboard and don't need all of those features. USB 3.1 is the solution to a previously unsolved problem, and Apple looks to be the first company to ship hardware using it.

Because your post referred to those two as examples of proprietary ports and they are not.

Moreover, your broader point is only marginally correct. While Apple has championed several proprietary connectors over the years, it has also advanced a number of worthwhile non-proprietary standards. The classic example is the original iMac, which used USB ports (and none of the previously-standard Apple proprietary connectors) well before the computer industry had embraced USB. In fact, at the time the iMac was introduced, there was not a single printer or scanner that would connect to it -- Apple bet the farm on a non-proprietary industry standard.

Also, Apple's proprietary connectors have a very good track record. As one example, the 30-pin connector survived for years and years across several iOS product lines.


Thanks for the reply guys, I'm learning more and more everyday.
 
If this is true, I wonder if this signals a shift away from the Lightning connector. Apple wouldn't shift to USB-C for just one device. If they do ditch Lightning, that would be one of their shortest-lived standards. But USB-C at least will be more compatible across a range of devices.

Probably as a result of the EU directive to have a universal charger on mobile phones.

----------


Boon, Boom AIR

----------

March can't come soon enough! I hope the airs aren't too far behind! Probably not the best place to ask, but does anyone know if the watch has a camera/FaceTime?

I am looking forward to the 14 inch MBA (in an 13 inch body), I would buy it instantly.

----------

Why does it have to be 12 inches.

14 Inch!!! that's what I want, 12 inch is just to small.
 
iOS and OS X work perfectly for me. Not a single problem. I'll be up a midnight to pre order the Apple Watch. The more of you who stay away from it, the easier it will be for me to get one. Waterproof, I don't need. I don't need to wear it in the shower.

It's actually hilarious to listen to you guys complain and point out why you won't buy it. Apple is actually aware of every single objection you have. Raising your objections here over and over again will get you nowhere. The watch will be what it will be in it's first generation. And Apple knows it will sell a millions of them without your participation. And they don't care. So, instead of moaning and groaning, find another solution that will make you happy. I promise you that Apple won't mind one little bit and your lost sale will be insignificant. You aren't nearly as powerful as you'd like to think you are.

Do you have an 6+? iOS on 6+ is complete mess for me. I experience at least 5 system and app crashes a day. That's not cool. System crashes when switching between apps, apps crash too and FPS lags on lock screen when interacting with notifications and also sometimes when rotating the screen.
I have done restores, and it's not a faulty model.
However, 5s on iOS 8.1.2 feels really stable and polished. I can't imagine how will 6+ perform on iOS 9 or even 10.
 
Not to be a party pooper, but I'm just not interested in these devices. I really wish apple would listen to people on this site and continue developing their desktop line up and focus on making Mac OS 10 as great as it can be. That's what the mac experience is really all about. #


To me the iPhone and iPad lines are next to being tapped out of ideas. A desktop and laptop are nothing special anymore; their a dime a dozen. A expensive gimmicky watch is not the answer. And that carplay crap is not required because the majority of drivers concentrate on driving first and foremost. And with carplay you're not going to upgrade it multiple times during the life of your car.
Apple needs something totally new and out the box that excites people. Something next generation. Not rehashes of old products or gimmicks. Initially the Apple watch was looking great until they actually started using the goofy thing. Then the price effectively killed the deal.
 
And you expect it to be fully charged by the time you're dressed if you plug it in right before the shower? Unless Apple implements ultra-fast charging in the Watch, that's unlikely to happen.

My Microsoft band charges to 80% in 20 minutes. That good enough to take me to the next day while constantly wearing it. Fast charging seems to be the answer for something expected to be worn almost constantly.
 
I still don't get, besides quickly telling time, why I would care for the apple watch features over my iPhone
 
Probably as a result of the EU directive to have a universal charger on mobile phones.
That expired two years ago. There is no such requirement currently. Also it was voluntary, no phone manufacturer was required to comply. Apple did choose to comply, and still does AFAIK.

The EU plans to re-introduce the requirement for a "common charger" for all wireless devices some time in 2017 - lets hope it's USB Type-C and not Micro USB.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_external_power_supply
 
I believe Apple watch will wither on the vine. It'll be similar to when Rhumba was for sale, the robotic vacuum cleaner. I sent it back because, I figured, all I needed was yet another device that I have to spend time over the phone with technical support, or pore over forums and articles in the search to find solutions to this or that niggling issue. Having to trouble shoot a laptop and a phone is sufficient for this user, thank you,
 
My Microsoft band charges to 80% in 20 minutes. That good enough to take me to the next day while constantly wearing it. Fast charging seems to be the answer for something expected to be worn almost constantly.

Not only that, but it appears that you could even charge the Apple Watch while you're wearing it at your desk if you wanted to. Just slip the magsafe charger disc between the back of the watch and your wrist - - it looks very low profile...

apple-watch-dock-concept-03.png
 
I still don't get, besides quickly telling time, why I would care for the apple watch features over my iPhone
Being able to tell the time is a very nice feature by itself. For some people that's enough by itself when combined with the fact it looks good, although fashion is obviously subjective.

And it's cheaper than a lot of watches - like this one for example: http://www.amazon.com/Citizen-CC107...&qid=1422192184&sr=1-1&keywords=citizen+watch

When your phone rings, you can screen your calls by glancing at your wrist instead of pulling it out of your pocket/handbag.

It silently presses against your wrist to notify of a phone call or text message or email, unlike an iPhone which either rings loudly or vibrates violently enough to be clearly audible by everyone else in the room.

You'll be able to read text messages and send simple replies again without pulling the phone out of your pocket or handbag.

You can make payments at any NFC equipped retail store in the world by just holding your wrist close to the payment terminal. No signature, no pin code, just touch your watch to it. If the watch is stolen/removed from your wrist, this shuts down - the next payment will require proof that you're wearing it and not someone else (Apple hasn't detailed exactly how that will work AFAIK).

Those are just the features that everyone will appreciate, it has others like playing music, fitness tracking, a remote for Apple TV, and whatever third party app your favourite developer comes up with.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
I will definitely be holding off until apple watch 2.

My needs:
wear in shower
wear while sleeping so I can track sleep and have a vibrating alarm so I don't wake up my partner.
36 hours battery life so I can wear at night
Go with the Jawbone Up 24 , is discrete,comes in nice colors , has a great app and you can use the JawBone Up or Sleepio or the Health Apps to track your sleep. It lasts for days. I figured that the watch is not intended to go into the fitness bracelet territory at all. The WATCH is a totally different approach to wearables , Apple has a winner here. I don't care about charging it every nite I do that with the phone already . This will be a fun accessory to wear ,plus a fashion statement . It will sold out in seconds .
 
Not only that, but it appears that you could even charge the Apple Watch while you're wearing it at your desk if you wanted to. Just slip the magsafe charger disc between the back of the watch and your wrist - - it looks very low profile...

Image

Of the smart watches I've owned (only two of them), I'd say that neither could be charged while wearing them. I think that represents a potential hazard - having your wrist tethered to a charging cable and then getting up. Seems like bad things could happen.
 
I dont wear a watch or an activity tracker on my wrist today. There are a lot of folks like me that gave up the watch after they bought the smart phone. There have been a lot of praises and complaints about the apple watch, but for me it will come down to use case. In my case I dont have a use for it yet.

As for the laptop. Here is what I hope Apple does over the course of the next year or so. upgrade iOS to allow for true multi tasking. provide a thier own keyboard cover options or create a mfi standard for keyboard covers. Add a larger iPad to their collection. When you put those together, you have a laptop that can be a tablet. I already use my ipad as my laptop (my other computer is the iMac), and if they made these changes I probably would never need my iMac.

Having sai all this I imagin that Apple will take their time to avoid over canibalization of the laptop and desktop lines.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.