Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.


A leaker claims Apple is currently embroiled in an internal debate over whether MagSafe should remain a standard iPhone feature.

iphone-17e-magsafe.jpg

The Weibo leaker known as "Instant Digital" says that when MagSafe was first introduced, the mood inside Apple was reportedly aggressive about its expansion. MagSafe for the iPhone was introduced with the iPhone 12 lineup in 2020, bringing a ring of magnets to the back of the device for snap-on charging and accessory attachment. The ecosystem has since expanded significantly, with dozens of third-party wallets, cases, stands, and chargers built around the standard.

There were purportedly even plans to bring built-in MagSafe magnets to the iPad lineup, something the leaker previously hinted at, though those plans never materialized. Bloomberg's Mark Gurman first reported in 2021 that Apple was testing a glass-backed iPad Pro that would support wireless charging, specifically noting that MagSalfe was under consideration. A follow-up report in early 2022 suggested Apple had prototyped an iPad Pro with a large glass Apple logo that would serve as the wireless charging area, an approach aimed at avoiding the fragility of an all-glass back. Neither design made it to a shipping product. The rumors resurfaced in late 2023, with reports suggesting that the then-upcoming iPad Pro could include MagSafe support, based on information from sources familiar with Apple's magnet suppliers. The redesigned M4 iPad Pro that launched in 2024 still shipped without the feature.

Now, Instant Digital claims that confidence around MagSafe has given way to uncertainty. The leaker says Apple is weighing the costs of including MagSafe magnets in the iPhone against the strength of the accessory ecosystem that has grown up around the feature, though the nature of the debate and what any change might look like remains unclear.

The iPhone 16e launched without MagSafe, making it the first new iPhone in years to omit it. Many iPhone 16e owners, as well as users of older iPhones without built-in magnets, turned to third-party cases with embedded magnet rings as a workaround, though the experience is generally considered to be inferior to native MagSafe support. The decision nonetheless drew criticism, and Apple reversed course with the iPhone 17e, restoring MagSafe support when the device launched earlier this year.

There is no indication that MagSafe is at imminent risk of disappearing from the iPhone lineup. However, the upcoming foldable "iPhone Ultra" may be a different story. Dummy models of the device show no visible indentations for the internal magnet array that MagSafe requires, suggesting the feature could be absent at launch. The iPhone Ultra is rumored to be just 4.5mm thin when unfolded, and it is thought that the device may simply be too slim to accommodate the magnets. If that proves accurate, the iPhone Ultra would be both the most expensive iPhone ever, with a starting price rumored at around $2,000, and the first new high-end model to ship without MagSafe since the iPhone 11 Pro.

While the wording of Instant Digital's post is somewhat ambiguous, it raises the possibility that Apple could be at least considering pulling MagSafe from its standard iPhone models, potentially making it exclusive to higher-end devices. Recent reports suggest that the standard iPhone 18 is being downgraded to cut costs.

An alternative scenario could see Apple scale back its in-device MagSafe implementation, relying more heavily on cases with embedded magnets to provide compatibility, as many iPhone 16e users already do. Given that Qi2, the open wireless charging standard now widely adopted across the industry, is built directly on MagSafe's magnet ring specification, a full removal of the feature from the entire iPhone lineup seems unlikely.

Article Link: Apple Reportedly Questioning Whether iPhone Should Drop MagSafe
Noooooooo!!! I Love my MagSafe!!!
 
MagSafe for me is one of the top features I want. Being able to just pop the iPhone on the magnetic charger in my car without having to fiddle with cables and stupid clamp mechanisms is something I appreciate multiple times a day. Then there's NightStand which is super nice. I don't see why they'd want to remove this instead of other features no one cares about (such as the 8GB RAM that's only there for AI which doesn't even work).
 
MagSafe should have never been included on the 12/13 mini nor the Air. Why? Because that precious space where the copper coil and magnets could have been used for a larger battery and weight savings.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: whelmedjedi
What!?!?!? THEY SHOULD INTRODUCE MORE MAGSAFE ACCESSORIES! Apple should sell their own magsafe stand, magsafe storage, magsafe everything. iPad and macbooks should get magsafe as well. Apple watch should be also compatible with big magsafe chargers like airpods does.
 
Dear Apple, I think you’re a bit confused. The saying is “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”… and NOT “if it ain’t broke, break it!!!”
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
I'd give up the CAMERA before I would give up MagSafe... hopefully just an unfounded rumour. Removing one of the most popular features ever would just be stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ImAlwaysRight
This rumor must be a carry-over from April 1st. NO WAY IT IS TRUE!

That said, if Apple ever WERE to drop MagSafe from the iPhone, I'm going to go out and buy the previous model that had it and not upgrade my iPhone for a long, long time.
 
MagSafe is so dope. Fire. Cool. Pick your generation word.

Heck, I even bought a MagSafe case for my iPad because even though it doesn't charge through it, I use all kinds of MagSafe mounts between my iPhone and my iPad.
 
Easy. Come up with an incompatible MagSafe 2, lighter, smaller and doesn't require a ring. People will have to upgrade all their accessories, but that's fine - Apple has done it before with the Mac.

tempImagexxuxtp.jpg
 
Last edited:
Damn it. This better not be true. I bought an expensive MagSafe charger for my 15 Pro Max. I am going to be upset if the next iPhone I buy doesn't have MagSafe. It was a great idea. It wouldn't be the first great idea they abandoned. Anyone remember 3D Touch?
 
That's fine as long as it is still magnetic and works as a mount, that's is all that matters. MagSafe on the Mac uses POGO.
On the Mac it doesn’t transfer data though. Maybe Apple to looking to expand and make it versatile.
 
iPhone 16e didn't have Magsafe (was so mad at that when I got those phones for my kids) and iPads, macs, etc, don't have Magsafe... That's the problem, it's inconsistent. Having said that, I like the feature very much.

For the macs: I mean the same as iPhone. I hate the Magsafe on the Macbooks. It scratches and chips and lowers the quality of the device.
 
  • Like
Reactions: stiligFox
I wonder if this is a misinterpretation of them debating whether to remove the specific branding of MagSafe, because at this point, wouldn’t any qi2 charging include magnets? Maybe that’s not part of the spec, idk, but it would seem crazy to me to remove it when it’s now part of the wireless standard.

Anyway, I’ve been using MagSafe for my phones since it was released and it’s been years at this point since I’ve used a USB cable at home for charging. It’d be a huge loss for me if they took it away.
Maybe. Apple called what was essentially perfectly standard WiFi as “AirPort”, and while that particular standard did exist before they adopted it, they were also the company that effectively made it truly standard. But a few years in, they did drop the branding (I believe it was only after they axed their own first-party base stations and streaming devices though).

As for MagSafe, not only is it just Qi2 at this point, it can also be confused with MagSafe 3, and some newcomers to the platform via earlier MacBook purchases may indeed wonder why their new iPhone doesn’t have a MagSafe-compatible “port” or something. The “MagSafe” name/trademark really *is* weird when it comes to branding, as it pertains to two very different standards. If they had focused on the induction part of the iPhone’s own (where the “safe” part doesn’t mean much or can even be considered misleading, since you could pretty much avoid accidents with cables with an OG Qi charger stuck to or even just laying on a desk with earlier, pre-MagSafe iPhones with Qi induction coils, and you can very well launch an iPhone towards the floor with a MagSafe puck cable because it really sticks to the phone, unlike MagSafe 1/2/3 cables, that do break away neatly from their MacBook counterparts), maybe they could’ve differentiated them properly.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpotOnT
I never use it so wouldn’t be a big deal personally but I have friends who swear by it! Tim or John you’d lose them as customers don’t switch!
 
I like MagSafe. I use the Apple Battery Packs to charge my iPhone Airs every night. Nice to be able to pickup the phone and use it if need be, without having to worry about a charging cord attached.
 
Wild stuff.

Leakers aren’t playing in 2026. ‘Instant Digital’s click-hunting & hit it big with this one 👏🏼
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.