I don't agree. It's good Apple is trying to address privacy and is also making more people aware of it.Then they should fire every Google and FaceBook App in their "store".
I don't agree. It's good Apple is trying to address privacy and is also making more people aware of it.Then they should fire every Google and FaceBook App in their "store".
I don't agree. It's good Apple is trying to address privacy and is also making more people aware of it.
Apple isn't addressing privacy when they accept money to make Google search the default. It's hypocritical.
Not millions—billions. Apple is a thousand times smarter than you give them credit for.At risk of repeating myself.. heck, what the he'll.. your prescious Apple is sticking two fingers up at you right now. Taking millions from Google to favour their search engine. And you big them up over Google about privacy. Hilarious!!!!!
You completely missed the pointWell good thing you can change your default search engine.
At risk of repeating myself.. heck, what the he'll.. your prescious Apple is sticking two fingers up at you right now. Taking millions from Google to favour their search engine. And you big them up over Google about privacy. Hilarious!!!!!
Apple isn't addressing privacy when they accept money to make Google search the default. It's hypocritical.
There is a difference between allowing the preferred search engine to pay to be the default engine with restrictions that keep them from tracking you across the web, then to have a company who does not respect your privacy because to do so would limit their ability to have access to the data Apple won’t give them.Classic Tim Cook/Apple doublespeak.
Until you stop demanding billions from Google there Timmy your supposed “Stance on Privacy” is nothing more than hot air and ********
I may have read this incorrectly, but in today's news re: the latest Facebook (FB) scandal, it was mentioned that Apple was/is amongst the companies buying user information collected by FB in one way or another, often obtained without user knowledge, let alone consent.
If this is not the case, I stand corrected and apologize to Dr. Cook. If the story is accurate, however, it would mean that despite doing all they can to prevent the bad guys from stealing my iPhone data directly, Apple's effort is somewhat diminished if they turn around and buy it all anyway from the likes of a Zuckerberg, no?
And you completely missed the point as wellExcept Google doesn’t get any identifying information about me. Only generic search requests.
Actually, they don’t even get that since I long ago set Duck Duck Go as my default.
Here's the issue though: You don't get to sit on your high horse and lecture people about privacy on one hand while taking kickbacks from a company that you regularly demonize for their supposed violations on the other.There is a difference between allowing the preferred search engine to pay to be the default engine with restrictions that keep them from tracking you across the web, then to have a company who does not respect your privacy because to do so would limit their ability to have access to the data Apple won’t give them.
How does Apple charging Google to be the default search engine affect your privacy?Apple isn't addressing privacy when they accept money to make Google search the default. It's hypocritical.
The same Apple who partner with Google on all things search? Interesting....
Is this why the government went to great lengths to force Apple to create a back door to their encryption? Which they failed.I cannot beleive that after more than 12 years of smartphone industry peoples still beleive this fiasco: privacy and encryption. Ever heard of sting rays or imsi? Your phone communicates with it fully decrypted! The Police have them, secret services, even hackers. Yea, Apple is more secure. Not! Just forget about this things like privacy and encryption. They are promoted so that you feel safe and encourage criminals that they are safe to do stuff, when in fact its the opposite.
Blasphemy.Why? I viewed that ad on my Windows desktop. Now that’s ironic.
Once again, you are under no obligation to keep Google as your default search engine. Apple doesn’t force that.Apple isn't addressing privacy when they accept money to make Google search the default. It's hypocritical.
Classic Tim Cook/Apple doublespeak.
Until you stop demanding billions from Google there Timmy your supposed “Stance on Privacy” is nothing more than hot air and ********
These ads don't work because it reminds people of iCloud celebrity nude pictures leak, Facetime eavesdropping, moving private user data to Chinese government servers, etc. when they watch them.
1) “Taking kickbacks” is a mis-characterization and you know it.Here's the issue though: You don't get to sit on your high horse and lecture people about privacy on one hand while taking kickbacks from a company that you regularly demonize for their supposed violations on the other.
It's called hypocrisy.
Here's the issue though: You don't get to sit on your high horse and lecture people about privacy on one hand while taking kickbacks from a company that you regularly demonize for their supposed violations on the other.
It's called hypocrisy.
It does? Maybe it reminds some people but I can’t (and I don’t know how you can say definitively) say it reminds all people. Not everybody is caught up in these stories about phishing and bugs. And probably fewer even care about policies in China. IMO, only the critics care.These ads don't work because it reminds people of iCloud celebrity nude pictures leak, Facetime eavesdropping, moving private user data to Chinese government servers, etc.
It’s called business. Most people understand google is not Apple, so your “argument” falls on its face.Here's the issue though: You don't get to sit on your high horse and lecture people about privacy on one hand while taking kickbacks from a company that you regularly demonize for their supposed violations on the other.
It's called hypocrisy.
Apple today shared a new privacy-focused iPhone ad on its YouTube channel. The ad will premiere tonight and air through March Madness in the United States before expanding to select other markets globally.
The 45-second video starts with the tagline "privacy matters" and then shows a variety of humorous if not slightly awkward situations where people would want their privacy protected in everyday life. In one scene, for example, two men briefly pause their conversation while a waitress is at their table.
"If privacy matters in your life, it should matter to the phone your life is on," the ad concludes. "Privacy. That's iPhone."
The ad arrives around six weeks after a major FaceTime bug was uncovered that allowed one person to call another person over FaceTime and listen to that other person's audio without the call being answered. Apple fixed the bug in iOS 12.1.4 and apologized, but it certainly wasn't good for its reputation.
Apple similarly promoted its privacy stance with a billboard near CES 2019 in Las Vegas that read "what happens on your iPhone, stays on your iPhone."
![]()
Bugs aside, Apple really does place an emphasis on privacy, especially compared to some other tech giants like Facebook. Apple has long said it believes privacy is a "fundamental human right," and as part of that, it aims to minimize its collection of customer data and disassociate it from an individual user when it does.
Article Link: Apple Says 'Privacy Matters' in Humorous New iPhone Ad
If only things were so black and white.Classic Tim Cook/Apple doublespeak.
Until you stop demanding billions from Google there Timmy your supposed “Stance on Privacy” is nothing more than hot air and ********