Yes, but that's only because she's not used to using the MacBook. I think it's just a muscle memory thing. I had family who did the same thing to my MacBooks but that habit basically stopped after they got their own.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Says Touchscreen Macs 'Not a Particularly Useful or Appropriate Application of Multi-Touch'
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Yes, but that's only because she's not used to using the MacBook. I think it's just a muscle memory thing. I had family who did the same thing to my MacBooks but that habit basically stopped after they got their own.
The only thing remotely useful that is usually done on a touchscreen laptop is scrolling and zooming. Maybe selecting an icon is a bit faster. That's about it. The trackpad can do all that without too much hand/wrist movement.
They stopped, because they learned they can't use it..
I mean, if you cant use it, why keep trying
Well yes exactly, but they won't do that because they want to sell you a Mac and an iPad Pro with Pencil. Thats the real reason why they won't put touch on the Mac.
That is still a touch screen.
[doublepost=1477934246][/doublepost]
iPad 3, Mac Mini, iPhone C
They wont forever be the most valuable company. Look at Radio Shack and Xerox, see what happened to them.
Apple is not the most valuable company on the planet... Don't know where you got that from, Aramco is the most valuable company on the planet. Aramco's value has been estimated at anywhere between US$1.25 trillion and US$10 trillion. Apple barely makes it into in the top ten of revenue.
Can anyone who's read the article tell me if he explains why haptics weren't a good idea in the touch bar? The only obvious explanation for me is that they're holding it for next year's model.
Also, I think it's only a matter of time before they follow Microsoft's lead. Touch is a great way to interact with some programmes, while keybaord and trackpad is a great way to interact with others. Imagine if your iMac did what the new Surface thing does, except it'll actually be useful because it'll have access to thousands of iOS apps, optimized for the bigger screen and merging seamlessly with their cursor-driven counterparts. I can also very much see the potential of those laptops where the screen turns around to be iPady (but with the benefit of being tilted), but again with Apple's app ecosystem behind it.
Also, I think it's only a matter of time before they follow Microsoft's lead. Touch is a great way to interact with some programmes, while keybaord and trackpad is a great way to interact with others. Imagine if your iMac did what the new Surface thing does, except it'll actually be useful because it'll have access to thousands of iOS apps, optimized for the bigger screen and merging seamlessly with their cursor-driven counterparts. I can also very much see the potential of those laptops where the screen turns around to be iPady (but with the benefit of being tilted), but again with Apple's app ecosystem behind it.
d) it's not practical and most people would never use it.
I know quite a few people with touch screen PCs and they don't even remember it can do it. They point at the screen to show me something and when it responds, they're like "what was that?"
I have an iPad for that. I never once thought to myself, "man I wish I could touch the screen on my computer". If I was a digital artist, perhaps I would find it useful.
What do you people with touch screen PCs find so useful? I'm honestly curious. I can't imagine it really being productive other than for perhaps artistic purposes. Even then, I just can't imagine taking my hands off of my keyboard and mouse and reaching my arms out to touch the screen. I actually just tried that move and it's really awkward and uncomfortable. I could maybe see it on one of those laptop/tablets, but on a desktop PC? I just don't see it.
With my setup, I have to reach out at arms length and lean forward to touch my screen. My shoulder would be aching after a couple of hours of that.
To people who complain about fingerprints etc on a screen: even if MacBook gets a touch screen you are not forced to touch it, you know. Stick to trackpad and keyboard.
Say that to my dad who asks where the keyboard and trackpad are when he looks at my iPad.
But seriously, Apple is NOT going to make a touch screen Mac just because your Mom can't figure out how to use a keyboard and multi-touch trackpad (or now a Touch Bar).
These are home users I'm talking about. I know plenty of business users who if I gave them a touchscreen PC, would never use it and forget it even does it. We bought a couple of touch screen HP PCs for our church and the other day I was pointing to the screen to point out something to somebody and launched an app and said "oops, I forgot this was touchscreen".
Last edited:
In my non scientific research I see people mainly exclamating the touch pad is an extra input device. "It's so much easier to scroll with your thumb on the screen, or so much easier dragging a file on screen. Or navigating pages or the OS."
But doesn't it occur to anyone doing these kind of actions just plain old suck with a windows trackpad? Of course I would also drag a file with my finger if I can avoid using those trackpads. This doesn't mean touch screen laptops are better, it means people find the path of least resistance. There would be no benefit of adding touch to macbooks because they already have a good input device. I can find zero meaningful usage for using a touch screen on a macbook.
But doesn't it occur to anyone doing these kind of actions just plain old suck with a windows trackpad? Of course I would also drag a file with my finger if I can avoid using those trackpads. This doesn't mean touch screen laptops are better, it means people find the path of least resistance. There would be no benefit of adding touch to macbooks because they already have a good input device. I can find zero meaningful usage for using a touch screen on a macbook.
You have identified the somewhat schizophrenic design choice Apple has made. It does have logic to it though. The additional keyboard (and if they chose, mouse/trackpad) for the iPad are accessories.
I honestly don't know what battery life would be lost with adding a multitouch screen to a laptop. Probably not a lot. Ultimately, Apple thinks it knows what is best for its Mac user experience and/or doesn't wish to compromise that vision. It would cost money to add and support touch on a Mac. Apple doesn't want to pay to make the handful of people who demand it happy.
Last edited:
I think that greatly depends on what you use your mac for. For instance, it's not going to be particularly useful if you're scrolling through facebook or macrumors 95% of the time, but I can tell you that for music producers, video editors, designers, and photographers (just to name a few) the multitouch tools that could be added to a touch bar would greatly improve our workflow.
Just one example is volume automation in a DAW like Pro Tools. Usually, you'd need to buy external hardware or tediously draw in your automation with a pen tool using your mouse or trackpad. With a touchbar, you could simply hit record movements and set your automation as the song plays.
This is just one example and I could name a thousand for each program I use on a daily basis. I'm actually really excited for touch bar.
This is correct if using cheap laptops. There are many windows laptops that have caught up to Apple. The trackpad is not an issue anymore.
And yes, it is convenient to be able to scroll using multi touch, even on a Mac.
I used to believe that Apple was right, but the only reason they say that is because they want people to go out and buy multiple devices. This is how Apple makes its money.
Microsoft had very bad implementations of touch UIs on Windows PCs. Windows 10 is much better and it shows that multi-touch is meaningful on a PC.
Apple should also find ways to bring touch screen based Macs on the market.
Well I used to believe microsoft was right and apple was wrong, until I bought a surface pro 4. One of the best windows trackpads, or so it was claimed, but I found it nerve wrecking to use, so I mainly used touch. But then I found out windows 10 was not nearly ready for touch. Such a cumber to use.
My kid uses an iPad. Touching the screen is first nature for him. And text input is pressing the mic and talking.