Size of the palm is just one aspect. Who said that palm size should be the limiting factor here? We use, say, laptops that are much bigger than palms just fine. Two other factors:
* Technical feasibility. In 2007 the battery on a 5' screen phone would last an hour, the phone would cost $2000 and graphics would be extremely slow.
* What we use the phones for. Nowadays we use them for anything but phone calls. We use them mostly as computers and people prefer to have decent (size wise) screens for their computers.
So, sure, those who use phone mostly for calling will prefer smaller phones. Others (the majority) want bigger phones.
buy a computer?
you dont see me buying a car for hauling 20t of sand, - photoshop on a mobile phone.
until we get expandable screens, mobile phones are 'exchange information' and 'poor media consumption devices' at best, even with 5 inches screens.
so why try to build a phone around a computer paradigm when the results will always be poor. lets build it around 'perfect mobile phone paradigm' with occasional semi-computer use, like iPhone for example.
the fundamental difference between the computer paradigm and perfect mobile phone paradigm is that you
HOLD YOUR PHONE IN YOUR HAND, hence the size of the palm is not a limiting factor, its a FUNDAMENTAL FACTOR around which a mobile phone is built.
5 inch screens? you get slightly better media consumption (from ****-poor to piss-poor) in exchange for lack of one-hand operability, a large table in your pocket and an idot-aura when using it as a
phone on your ears (some of us still make calls, believe it or not)
but come on people, media consumption on a 5 inch screen? 6 inch? get a grip, and buy a computer with real screen, or at least a tablet. i wont even touch media production.
btw, theres a reason for differentiation. mobile phones cant be computers. both are built for different uses and if you mix them, you always get mediocre results, thats why they are separated. remember? differentiation? thats what got us here in the first place, from the stone age, i mean. and just to make sure, difference between computers and mobile phones is solely the size, both are basically computers. question just popped in my mind, why not make phones like imacs with 27 inch screens? it would be awesome to watch movies on that.
and if you really insist on
super-mobile devices with larger screens, check out the tablets.
thank god for apple's authoritarianism
ps. please, reread the bolded statement at least twice
and no hard feelings, im just killing time
