Schadenfreude is bad karma. You haters should hope that Samsung SDI (the battery manufacturer in question) did not produce exploding Li-Ion batteries for Apple's iPhone. They're on Apple's supplier list.
Tim Cook and Co. right now
![]()
Really? I really have to google "Apple Suppliers List" for you? 1st hit.How do you know they are on the supplier list ?? Do you work in Apple or have access to their supply chain information ??
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I wonder if the Pixel will replace the Galaxy phone as premium handset choice for Android. Samsung might still outsell Google, as they do Apple, but using low- and mid- cost handsets to make up the difference.
I'm old enough to remember the Ford Pinto and the exploding gas tank, when the Pinto was struck from behind.
Maybe Samsung took a page from that book of disasters. IIRC - When Ford realized they had a problem, rather than recall all those Ford Pintos sold to the public and undertake an expensive rework, the accountants did a ROI and figured that it would be cheaper to settle the wrongful death lawsuits that were expected rather than recall and correct the faulty gas tank design. That's a really poor decision based on $$$ and not lives needlessly lost.
Schwartz studied the fatality rates of the Pinto and several other small cars of the time period. He noted that fires, and rear-end fires in particular, are very small portion of overall auto fatalities. At the time only 1% of automobile crashes would result in fire and only 4% of fatal accidents involved fire, and only 15% of fatal fire crashes are the result of rear-end collisions.[6] When considering the overall safety of the Pinto Schwartz notes that subcompact cars as a class have generally higher fatality risk. Pintos represented 1.9% of all cars on the road in the 1975–76 period. During that time the car represented 1.9% of all “fatal accidents accompanied by some fire.” Implying the car was average for all cars and slightly above average for its class.[127] When all types of fatalities are considered the Pinto was approximately even with the AMC Gremlin, Chevrolet Vega, and Datsun 510. It was significantly better than the Datsun 1200/210, Toyota Corolla and VW Beetle.[6] The safety record of the car in terms of fire was average or slightly below average for compacts and all cars respectively. This was considered respectable for a subcompact car. Only when considering the narrow subset of rear-impact, fire fatalities is the car somewhat worse than the average for subcompact cars. While acknowledging this is an important legal point, Schwartz rejects the portrayal of the car as a firetrap.[/quote]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Pinto
http://www.perishablepundit.com/docs/The_Myth_of_the_Ford_Pinto_Case.pdf
#2. The types of analyses over death and cost for death happens all the time across all industries. It's nothing new and just something we don't like to talk or think about.
Let us hope that phones spontaneously bursting into flames fosters some innovation...![]()
To think of all the flack Apple took for antenna-gate, scratch-gate and bend-gate.
Any company can have a product bomb, but they are not actually supposed to be a bomb or incendiary device.
Well I guess it took a few years, but SJ did end up going 'thermonuclear' , in a way, on Samsung...
I think it looks good on Samsung for all the direct marketing attacks they've done on Apple.
I would produce a video with folks running with fear and panic through the streets as explosions randomly go off around them (and maybe in a few pockets) and then have Tim standing at the end saying, “Nope...our phones don’t do that)
In a month where Apple's dying Mac lineup was supposed to be revamped, MacRumors has gotten to the bottom of the story... By posting article after article of incremental beta updates as front-page news. Well done.
The fact that they have announced that they will Stop the selling and production of the Note 7.
It's going to cost them dearly - but, it's the right thing to do. IMO - It just took them too damn long to do it!
YMMV
Ahh, some adult thinking at last.Nah, this is Apple's greatest fear of happening to them with every iPhone launch. Except it won't be $20 billion in lost sales, it will be $100 billion in lost sales. I bet we see more leaks next year of the iPhone as Apple increases its testing period with the new form factor. Samsung is a great manufacturer and for this to happen to them and for them not be able to figure out how to fix it after two months has got to be scaring Cook and the rest of Apple.
Difference between the two: Apple blamed the user and never fixed those *gate issues. Calling yourself courageous just shows how big of an ego you have.
Samsung is offering refunds. It takes courage to admit mistakes
But first they did a recall and then announced "fixed" Note 7s and sold them. That was a failure. Doing this a second time and then trying to revive the line is impossible from a marketing perspective. This is more of a technical issue but the engineers failed to address or identify the root cause of the fires. So in some ways you can't blame upper management as I'm sure the engineers didn't tell management, "Go out and sell these, we've reduced explosions from 1 out of 1,000 to 1 out of 20,000." The engineers must have given the replacements a clean bill of health.
especially when you consider similar problems with hoverboards catching fire. How close to the edge are iPhones and other Apple devices with similar power sources, and what's the outlook for safer battery technology?
Ahh, some adult thinking at last.
I'll take your thought and say that maybe Apple will even delay the next iPhone, like they did with the Macs, but not for the same reasons. Imagine the "can't innovate... my ass" line Phil or Tim could tout if they'd be the first with a longer life, safer battery in a curved glass iPhone 8. "Go ahead, bend it, blend it... it won't catch fire."
Who gets the bill if that happens? Besides, this is so far from schadenfreude. It's karmatic retribution. Samsung deserve this. They ignored safety concerns and shipped anyway. Did you not see the leaked emails? They don't give two ***** about their customers. And they continually tried to brush it under the carpet once it happened. No leadership, no care, no responsibility. Certainly not schadenfreude.Schadenfreude is bad karma. You haters should hope that Samsung SDI (the battery manufacturer in question) did not produce exploding Li-Ion batteries for Apple's iPhone. They're on Apple's supplier list.
LOL! They look just like all the other 2016 phones. (Not the ones actually on fire)Those pixels are god aweful ugly. If no Samsung then its back to iPhone
Nah, I dunno. Gotta defend my engineering brethren here and some personal experience with engineers & management.
It's typically the engineers that warn middle management, but that middle layer often misrepresents those warnings to upper management. The 1986 Challenger Shuttle disaster was an example of that.
Nice bait thread title. Couldn't leave it at Apple's finances, had to throw Samsung's name in there. How many added clicks did that net you?
In a month where Apple's dying Mac lineup was supposed to be revamped, MacRumors has gotten to the bottom of the story... By posting article after article of incremental beta updates as front-page news. Well done.
I guess I'm missing the big picture. I visit websites like this because Apple products interest me. But all I get from this site now are shareholder results and software developer ads. Thanks.
Nice bait thread title. Couldn't leave it at Apple's finances, had to throw Samsung's name in there. How many added clicks did that net you?
In a month where Apple's dying Mac lineup was supposed to be revamped, MacRumors has gotten to the bottom of the story... By posting article after article of incremental beta updates as front-page news. Well done.
I guess I'm missing the big picture. I visit websites like this because Apple products interest me. But all I get from this site now are shareholder results and software developer ads. Thanks.