Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
if anyone buying one of these wants to just pay me that money i’ll happily show up at your house and be an embarrassing, useless purchase you’re going to regret later. so same experience.
Vision Pro will be away more useful than you, so really strange joke.

EDIT: Just to clarify preemptively clarify, this is not an insult at the original commenter. It is a statement on the utility of the device, and how clearly this device will be more useful to the purchaser than the commenter being a “useless purchase” (their words) for the buyer. It just wasn’t a good joke, and it’s another example of the reflexive need to crap on Apple on these threads. Very tiresome.
 
Last edited:
$3500... I'm really worried this thing is gonna get Chromecasted.

One of these "also decent" headsets that's 70% as nice and 70% cheaper might eat its lunch before Apple can get the price out of the stratosphere.

To this day, my wife has never seen the value of an Apple Watch, but she's a huge iPhone/iPad/iMac user. This could be that, but even more so.
Despite the fact that your wife has never seen the value of an Apple Watch, Apple would love for "This could be that, but even more so." Apple sells more watches than all of Switzerland does.
 
The commercial is clever and fun. However, it's also funny that all of the characters (except for the Minion) are putting on goggles/helmets as they embark on an epic adventure of some sort. The woman wearing the Vision Pro is getting ready to sit on her couch. 😅
that's when her adventure starts
 
This has got to be the first new Apple product category that 99.9% of its customers cannot afford.

IMO not a great way to introduce a new product category, lol.
I don’t know that the Apple II was technically affordable for most people. Nor the Macintosh. The iPhone was slammed for being too expensive. To say 99.9% of customers “cannot” afford this is just too loose language. ”Afford” is relative in many cases, not absolute. To the point where I’m not sure it’s worth even mentioNing. Also, I’m not sure Apple intends for this to be “affordable”. Later versions will be, surely.

But we must be negative and cynical, so let’s carry on.
 
I think there are a tonne of use cases, especially commercial ones. Hell, for my writing, I'd love to be able to put scene and character cards on a massive virtual display, rearrange the order, modify details, and flip between projects without having to bluetack things to the walls all over my house. The price is high, so it's out of my reach, but hopefully as the tech develops, that will change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pianophile
I love the cord that hangs down from them. Where does that go? Into an outlet? LOL
Yes, you point out the obvious about All technology.

...PS5, plugged-in, ...X-box, plugged-in, Internet Router, plugged-in, ...Desktop Computer, plugged-in, wifi access points, plugged-in ...& on & on & on

&
...yes, yes, ...And batteries, for our mobile technology.

So your pointing out the limitations, of battery technology, in the year 2024. ...kudos, ...but you do know that battery technology is product agnostic?

..And more importantly, "the current battery technology in 2024"
takes absolutely nothing away,
from the "revolutionary computing interface",
that is the Apple Vision Pro.
 
Last edited:
I was going to complain about no BTTF...then I watched the commercial and saw it! However, with that battery life, Doc Brown will need to give them a Flux Capacitor to get an all day charge:

View attachment 2334314



“I'm sure that in 2054, plutonium is available in every online drugstore for the VisionPro implant, but in 2024, it's a little hard to come by.”
 
I don’t know that the Apple II was technically affordable for most people. Nor the Macintosh. The iPhone was slammed for being too expensive. To say 99.9% of customers “cannot” afford this is just too loose language. ”Afford” is relative in many cases, not absolute. To the point where I’m not sure it’s worth even mentioNing. Also, I’m not sure Apple intends for this to be “affordable”. Later versions will be, surely.

But we must be negative and cynical, so let’s carry on.
An Apple II wasn't really affordable for most people. MSRP of a 64k Apple IIe in December 1983 is $1,395 or around $4,200 today.

There was a whole computer industry that popped up in Europe just because Apple and IBM machines were priced into the stratosphere for them.

So knowing that and what you've just said, $4,200 is technically affordable.
 
I don't game and never have so in order for something like to appeal to someone like myself it would have to be useful and comfortable.

A tall order, going by what I'm seeing now. Then again, the gaming market may be enough for considerable sales.
 
Well that’s the Meta Quest 3 right now. I have friends who dislike everything Facebook yet they got Quests 3 because they know they won’t be able to afford a Vision Pro at the current price.
I got the Meta Quest 3, even though I'm planning to buy the Vision Pro. I had been promising my kids that I'd get the Quest 3, every time they asked me to get the Quest 2. The Quest 3 seemed like a significant upgrade from the Oculus Go I had previously.

Your friends getting the Quest 3 because they can't afford the Vision Pro reminds me of a Commodore 64 club I belonged to in the mid-1980s. We loved our computers, but we all agreed we'd buy a Mac if we could afford it.

Anyway, my kids love the Quest 3, and I'm hoping it will ease the sting when I tell them they can't use my Vision Pro.

What I'm looking for with the Vision Pro is a more polished interface, higher resolution, and integration with my Apple ecosystem. I'm impressed with the Quest 3, but getting my personal content on it (spatial videos and other 3D movies and images that I've taken with other 3D cameras) is a pain.
 
Interestingly (or not) this time they used some rock song instead of the trap music they been using recently. I guess the electric guitar is an instrument that will get you excited no matter what :D
 
No one said it wasn’t cool before. This is just your anti-Apple bias orientation speaking.
Actually, I think the market declared 3D "not cool" pretty loud and clear. 3D movies have always been a hard sell. 3D TVs were a huge flop. So, yeah, very few people thought 3D was cool or it would be omnipresent by now. The technology has existed for decades. The public doesn't seem to want it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.