Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Must have thought the iPhone 14 pro was in stock
idk… I would say I have a good sense of humor and can make a joke out of anything, but did you really think this post was funny or necessary?

like, I know it’s the Internet and you can be all anonymous and whatever, but that joke (IMO) was just lame as a lot of the posts in this thread are.

just sad.
 
@arn where are you guys getting “several” casualties? As far as I can tell there is one confirmed casualty.
The definition of casualty:

A person suffering from injuries or who has been killed due to an accident or through an act of violence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
@arn where are you guys getting “several” casualties? As far as I can tell there is one confirmed casualty.

Edit: never mind, sorry… had an incorrect definition of “casualty” in my head.
You were probably thinking fatalities.
I had to do a quick check myself
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
There has been an long time recall on Toyota Tacoma's and 4Runner's that have had issues with their floor mats getting caught by the accelerator. I don't think anyone knows yet if this was the cause, or if the driver was the original owner who would have gotten the recall notice, did a dealer sell it to him, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Devastating! I hope everyone is ok. Apple really needs to install security steel poles to prevent any type of vehicles from coming into the glass.
Yes, and metal detectors, full body scanners, and a prohibition on liquids over 2 ounces.
Please. Every incident doesn't merit a response. Risk aversion is destroying our quality of life.
 
Generally, it's reported it's a Tesla when the Tesla's autonomous driving systems are activated and it crashes. But I'm glad this was your main take-away from this tragic event.
Not true. The stories generally claim that self-driving was active when there is no evidence of that, and the system was actually off. Even the first responders have been documented lying - saying that "no one was behind the wheel", when full investigations prove them wrong. Most news stories sensationalizing Tesla crashes turn out to be partially or fully false. It's the nature of "news" - profit is the goal, not accuracy.
 
The only good thing about the crass remarks and comments from supposed know-it-alls who are making statements that are provably false is that they've given us a batch of accounts to block/ignore.
 
Or a medical condition, like the driver had a stroke, heart attack, epilepsy seizure as examples.
Although I understand your thought, the article says that the driver is in police custody, which would argue against a medical condition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wanha
Please explain the negatives of adding some type of poles (which exist in many other locations already) to prevent possible future tragedies.

Here are a couple of negatives that come to mind:

1. Cost
2. the same reason we don't bars on our home windows to prevent people from breaking in - they communicate fear and distrust, which is probably the last thing Apple wants to associate with their stores
 
Everything is possible, but I don't know how much we're helping anyone by speculating.

Best to wait for some facts.
You’re right. I was responding to someone else’s speculation with my own. I contributed to the problem that I was saying was reckless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wanha
Thanks for that. I went nearly 30 years thinking casualty = death.
Me too. Unless I’m mistaken, I think the term is primarily used to describe military-related deaths/injuries, or at least this was the initial use of the word. I think it is more common for a report to list deaths and injuries separately.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
Here are a couple of negatives that come to mind:

1. Cost
2. the same reason we don't bars on our home windows to prevent people from breaking in - they communicate fear and distrust, which is probably the last thing Apple wants to associate with their stores
Many Apple stores already have some type of barrier in front of them though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CarlJ
Me too. Unless I’m mistaken, I think the term is primarily used to describe military-related deaths/injuries, or at least this was the initial use of the word. I think it is more common for a report to list deaths and injuries separately.
It can be confusing because sometimes all the casualties are deaths, like in many airplane crashes - so you get used to them being equivalent (Venn diagrams overlap completely), but, indeed, casualty is “killed or injured”. And, yeah, the military uses the term a lot (for them it has the implication of “how many soldiers are no longer fit to fight”).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.