Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Put that in a 32" 6K and I am ready to order. Did not buy the LG 6K and wait for spring (and hoping not only 27" is coming)

There's zero chance Apple will release two sizes of Studio Display...if you want a 32" screen they'll happily sell you a Pro Display XDR.

Hopefully it will continue to feature a beautiful glossy coating and offer more connection options than just Thunderbolt, such as DisplayPort and HDMI, so that the ASD2 can also be used with a PC.

I believe PCs support Thunderbolt and USB-C?

Just wondering why Apple is not using OLED for the new displays, considering the iPad Pro/iPhone is OLED and supposedly so is the next MacBook Pro?

Cost and brightness. OLED costs have come way down for phone-sized panels and TV-sized panels, but not necessarily for display-sized panels.

I paid just over US$1500 for my LG 32" 6K after discounts, and the LG 6K includes Thunderbolt 5, 99% AdobeRGB coverage, and height adjustable stand.

But it's ugly and plastic?
 
Thats pretty harsh considering it was launched 5 years ago and it’s still the best 5k monitor on the market.

I mean it would be fair to question value for money, but as far as computer gear goes that is quite an achievement considering monitors are not exactly a niche product.
To be fair, 5K 16:9 HiDPI monitors are very uncommon and none of the ones available are high-spec monitors. As mentioned before, I think the ASD is a great monitor in terms of QA and colour calibration, but it's at best mid spec aside from its pixel density. It has mediocre Adobe RGB coverage, and the contrast ratio is low, whereas higher contrast IPS monitors are relatively common now. The ASD doesn't support HDR either, and it's 60 Hz.

But it's ugly and plastic?
Yes it is plastic, but I think it looks pretty good. I did get a third party stand for it though. Actually I think the stock stand looks good too, but it doesn't go very low at its lowest height setting, and it doesn't have cable management. The third party aluminum stand I got goes 1.6" lower, has cable management, and matches the colour of the monitor perfectly.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0685.jpeg
    IMG_0685.jpeg
    208 KB · Views: 1
  • IMG_0709.jpeg
    IMG_0709.jpeg
    357.8 KB · Views: 1
There's zero chance Apple will release two sizes of Studio Display...if you want a 32" screen they'll happily sell you a Pro Display XDR.
The XDR also desperately needs to be replaced. This is just a branding question, so who knows what Apple will do.

But it's ugly and plastic?
Only look at the screen part and it'll be fine.
 
I doubt it. I suspect the next iMac will remain 60 Hz, just like the next MacBook Air. I would be happy to be wrong though.
It really depends when that next iteration lands. MBA is a high-refresh-rate (no pun) product. Whereas iMac is at a lower cadence than the mini at this stage.
 
I hope Apple returns to offering size options for their display lineup.

'returns' ? they would have to leave to 'return'. There are two display now. One is very expensive, but it exists.

If we break off 2019 Apple and the Mac Pro apology plus the over-engineered and overpriced XDR, I think it would make sense to return back to sanity and offer the same display in more sizes, like the Cinema Displays of yore.

Studio Display in 27” 5K or 32” 6K. Feature parity, design parity. Get back to basics.

If they went to two consumer targets displays with same baseline panel technology, then the display in the iMac likely would be target number 2 added. More likely 24" iMac panel and 27" 5K .

24" would likely be closer to $999 . 32" would likely be a move to 'even more expensive' ( basically same issue the XDR has). There is a gap between $2.5-3K and the XDR price point , but not as many people with matching budget there. If Apple is going to eventually upgrade the remaining iMac to a much newer technology panel , then they likely are going to want more panel users to amortize those higher costs over. Apple could upgrade the monitor variant before the iMac if that timing worked out.

It is somewhat of a awkward set-up when Apple's highest volume product (entry laptops) costs less than their docking displays. IT would be more normal if the display cost less than the system core (e.g, laptop $1099-1299 and even a $999 monitor).

If the it is a 5K / 120Hz / mini-LED panel that nobody else is buying plus a A19 ... then the Studio Display price isn't likely going lower.

There are enough decently affordable, 6K panels around that Apple would just leave that as a 3rd party opportunity.

P.S. The bulk of the "Apple Cinema Display" era was about having a more affordable option. Not two relatively expensive ones. (and also tended not to be released in pairs. )


27 and 30+ is only going to be expensive and even more expensive.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
If they went to two consumer targets displays with same baseline panel technology, then the display in the iMac likely would be target number 2 added. More likely 24" iMac panel and 27" 5K .

I could see Apple doing:

$999: 4.5K 24" IPS (external version of iMac screen)
$2499: 5K 27" miniLED
$3999: 6K 32" miniLED

Tandem-OLED is an unknown?
Maybe the middle monitor could be $1999?
 
I could see Apple doing:

$999: 4.5K 24" IPS (external version of iMac screen)
$2499: 5K 27" miniLED
$3999: 6K 32" miniLED


Tandem-OLED is an unknown?
Maybe the middle monitor could be $1999?

Is the 6K miniLED suppose to be the XDR replacement? If Apple intends to replace the XDR with with a similarly priced model I don't see them doing that upper one. Floating 4 monitors models? Probably not.

Apple could get the scale-up and kinks out of the tandem-OLED 24" panel out in the "Display" product, before moving the more price sensitive placement in the iMac. A 4.5K monitor at $999 isn't going to sell in super high unit volume. At those above prices none of those will. Apple is shipping tandem OLDE 13" now. 24" is a step up in size but not in the underlying tech. [ And they could just 'gut' the iMac and replace the Mn with a simpler logic board and the A19 ).

Apple has had the miniLED tech on the MBP for years at this point. Sliding that into the Studio Display should end up at a price closer to what it is now. ( price could be going higher though. Has to be a way better story as to why paying for an A19 though. )
 
  • Love
Reactions: _Mitchan1999
Is the 6K miniLED suppose to be the XDR replacement? If Apple intends to replace the XDR with with a similarly priced model I don't see them doing that upper one.
They could still charge $1000 for the stand and $1000 for the nano coat. The XDR is woefully out of date at this point, and while my proposed $4000 monitor wouldn't quite be a"let's pretend it competes with reference monitors", it would also be cheaper. Maybe Apple will replace the XDR price point at some point too.

A 4.5K monitor at $999 isn't going to sell in super high unit volume. At those above prices none of those will.
I agree, they would not be a super high unit volume sellers and Apple is clearly OK with that when it comes to displays.

Yeah, maybe larger retina tandem-OLEDs could come out to replace the miniLED above, but I don't think that would hugely impact my price guesses.
 
It depends on whether or not Apple uses display stream compression (DSC) or whether they'll require Thunderbolt 5 for an uncompressed signal.

Both the current Studio Display and the Pro Display XDR use DSC (even though the Studio Display technically doesn't need to), so that might be telling.
Sound like a standard, if apple will implement
5K 120Hz with Display Stream compression isn't that much data:

Under 30Gbps?
View attachment 2586834
and without DSC?
 
OK maybe this has already been discussed. But if they actually release a 5K screen with 120hz (if 5K is the best rumor?). What would the requirements be? Would the current MBP M5 be sufficient? Would the upcoming Mac Mini M5 base model likely be sufficient?
I'm looking to upgrade to either the current base model MBP M5, or the upcoming base model Mac Mini M5.
But I'm also a sucker for 120hz, and wouldn't want to be left out when the screen releases
 
OK maybe this has already been discussed. But if they actually release a 5K screen with 120hz (if 5K is the best rumor?). What would the requirements be? Would the current MBP M5 be sufficient? Would the upcoming Mac Mini M5 base model likely be sufficient?
I'm looking to upgrade to either the current base model MBP M5, or the upcoming base model Mac Mini M5.
But I'm also a sucker for 120hz, and wouldn't want to be left out when the screen releases
I'm guessing probably any Apple Silicon Mac would be fine, even M1. However, if not M1, then M2.
 
Already very happy with our original ASD, but it would be nice to have the same display specs when switching from our MBPs to using our Mac Studio. Not sure how much Apple's going to increase the price when this comes out, though!
 
I bought an ASD on release day, and it is still perfect. Excellent monitor.
Bought my 2 Apple Studio Displays just 6 months ago brand new and love them.
The ones I saw back then had uniformity issues. When you moved the mouse and looked at the pointer across a white background, or when you scrolled up/down a light website (white or light colors), it was apparent that there were some dark lines or different color zones. Usually in the form of horizontal lines.

Maybe nowadays they are perfect. I’d be interested in a new ASD if it wasn’t because I cannot plug my PS5 Pro to it :(
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.