ME: "Hey Siri, whats my schedule for today"
....
....
....
SIRI: "Hello. how can I help you"
ME: "I just asked you! What's my schedule"
...
...
SIRI: "I'm sorry, I didnt catch that"
ME: "WHAT IS MY SCHEDULE"
...
...
SIRI: "Let me search on the internet for "Sheds r you will"
marketing is feelzYou know Apple, maybe your money was better spent in actual "R&D" for Siri. This high profile commercial is just proof that you know Siri is losing ground to Alexa. Now, all you're trying to market is the feelz.
Apple has plenty of money, but Tim's holding it to reach the Trillion $ mark.Why? Just why? I don't know how much that cost but why couldn't that money have been put into R&D on the new Mac Pro or figuring how to add a regular USB to the MacBook Pro....
What you mean like when Kevin Costner advertised the Lisa?
Or when Jobs got Jeff Goldblum in to advertise Mac?
Or when they got a host of celebrities to feature in the Switches series in 02?
Or when they got Verne Troyer to advertise the PowerBook G4 in 03?
Or when they got U2 to advertise the iPod in 04?
Or Eminem in 05?
Or Bob Dylan in 06?
Or Paul McCartney in 07?
I could go on. You get the point.
[doublepost=1500893115][/doublepost]
The've read "movie" and actual though it was a movie and fallen over to make themselves look stupid in the comments section.
It's just another celebrity Apple ad, like the many many that were released every year under Jobs. People on here are stupid.
The advert is probably aimed at getting more people to use Siri's basic functionality. Voice assistants is still a way underutilised feature on smartphones, and I don't see anything wrong with marketing a feature to get more people to use it. Why not, since it's already there on your phone?I watched it just like most of the people who commented will too. It was funny, I liked it. I laughed.
I did not see any new functions from Siri.
I think The Rock was trolling the MacRumors community by calling it a "movie" to see the reaction. Well played, Dwayne. Well played.
Actually, that's Apple's fault for this. It should have never said 'movie' in the ad
It's misleading and dishonest... they should've been direct with the audience
It's called miscommunication on Apple's part and an advertisement fail
That article doesn't even talk about what Apple really wants. I have TONS to say about this topic but I'm not going to type up a full article here. To keep it short:
- Apple wants a full all-in-one Apple-branded TV in every living room (not a set top box). This will solve many UX problems
- In order to sell these TVs, Apple wants to sell a service that everyone is willing to buy into
Operating under the assumption that Netflix will never license their original content to Apple's new (competing) service, Apple can either:
- Try to fight Netflix by building a better Netflix service with better original content and licensed content
- Buy Netflix, acquire the original content, and acquire the talent to support the new service
What about HBO? Other channels? They currently have complicated contracts with their distributors, so even if Apple acquired them, it'll take a while to transition to an Apple only service, which in the meantime can hurt current Apple TV customers/hurt the Apple brand. Hulu? Amazon Video? Never going to happen. But with Netflix - they're on their way to becoming a self sustaining/original content company without the need of licenses to other shows.
Sticks need to be removed from your collective lightning ports.
That advert was hilarious!
The vast majority of posters in this thread need to lighten up.
They shutter the Airport team, but they have resources to throw at this garbage?
For new users that indeed might be true.The advert is probably aimed at getting more people to use Siri's basic functionality. Voice assistants is still a way underutilised feature on smartphones, and I don't see anything wrong with marketing a feature to get more people to use it. Why not, since it's already there on your phone?