Wow, when did Apple become so far behind the curve that they tried to compete literally years *behind* what even Samsung is doing?
Jesus...next they'll release a VCR and then a punch card reader
Bring Steve back from the dead!!!
If Apple made a phablet, I bet it would be 5.7" with a resolution of 1536x1024 (half a retina iPad mini).
By some weird coincidence, Samsung's Galaxy Note 3 sports a 5.7" screen, exactly half the size of the iPad mini screen, even though it has a completely different display technology and resolution. But of course, Samsung would never spy on Apple to know what product they're working on.
Mid-size, large and...small. How about a small phone for those who just want to use it as a phone, show some photos of the kids, take a photo, play iTunes, be able to look something up in an emergency but it wouldn't be ideal for internet use.
It would also be great as a car phone, an emergency phone for kids, a grandma phone and so on. Millions of people would like an Apple phone and all that, but have no interest in nerdy stuff at all.
Of course such a format might work well with the iWatch, rarely leaving a pocket or purse.
It just bothers me that Apple is chasing the competition rather following the beat to their own drum.
They created the entire category. How is screen size some kind of major innovation.
Apple's fixed resolutions, whilst allowing developers to ensure a tight design on all devices, kind of dig them into a hole when it comes to changing their devices' screens.
The change from the first 3 generations' 480x320 to iPhone 4's 960x640 was smart, as the aspect ratio remained the same and also because it was an integer multiplication of each dimension (x2), so there was no problem upscaling old apps.
iPhone 4S's 960x640 to 1136x640 was smart too. They changed the aspect ratio but kept one dimension the same, increasing the other. Black bars at top and bottom helped with the transition, so there was no problem displaying old apps as they were designed.
But now, I'm sure they can make a change to aspect ratio, size, or resolution in such a way that minimises the impact on developers like they have the other times. They are unlikely to want to change the aspect ratio again. Unless they lower the pixel density (going against all the Retina marketing), any increase in screen size requires an increase in resolution, but I really don't see them doubling the pixels in each dimension again. That would be 2272x1280 - surely a battery killer, and even if they go up to 6", that's 435 PPI, a bit overkill. But there'd also be problems if they applied a decimal multiplication of pixels.
So I'm quite interested to see what they do.
The desperation is hilarious.
EVERYONE is missing the point of this article. The ONLY reason this article exists today, from no less than WSJ, is because Samsung just announced the 5.7" Note 3 yesterday. This is Apple's way of telling any existing iPhone users who want a larger phone to wait. But another year?
I don't think it works this time.