Nowhere near 480p->1080p. But it does make a difference. 4K only makes a difference if you are pretty close to the TV, or if you have a very large TV set. HDR makes a bigger difference, as long as your TV is good at it...HDR10 doesn't really set a strict standard of how things have to look, so some cheaper sets aren't as impressive.I guess I need to buy 4k HDR TV before I get too excited about this.Does 4k HDR even make a big difference compared to 1080p?
I guess I need to buy 4k HDR TV before I get too excited about this.Does 4k HDR even make a big difference compared to 1080p?
My Sony is about 4 years old but not a 4K just 1080p, is 4K that much better?
I guess I need to buy 4k HDR TV before I get too excited about this.Does 4k HDR even make a big difference compared to 1080p?
My 3rd gen Apple TV from 2012 still does what I need to do.
I'm sorry, but whoever wrote that doesn't know what they're talking about.Uh....no.
Think about it. 4k itself is a number that only refers to the number of vertical lines in the image. There are twice as many lines in a 4k image as there are in a 1080p image. It is confusing because 1080p refers to the number of horizontal lines. You have four times as many pixels because twice the resolution in each direction gets you four times the surface area.
Here you go
Here is more on why it is only 2x the resolution:
https://www.redsharknews.com/technology/item/1650-is-4k-twice-or-four-times-as-good-as-hd
Blu-ray will still have much better audio quality because it's uncompressed, discrete 5.1 or 7.1. Anything streamed to a 4k ATV will still suffer from lossy compression and might have to be decoded from stereo LtRt to 5.1, depending on the source. Theoretically, it should be able to support Atmos since that signal is sent via HDMI, so it would probably be up to content creators (i.e. Netflix) to enable that sort of functionality.So... what will output better audio: 4K ATV or your typical blu-ray player? Will 4K ATV support Dolby Atmos?
I bought a 42" HD tv 8 years ago for $1,200. $1,500 to $2,000 isn't that bad.you need a minimum of a 65 inch screen to see the massive difference. problem is a good 65 inch 4K tv is minimum $1500-$2000
Correct me if I'm wrong.. but 8,294,400 is 4x 2,073,600, correct?
The Apple TV 3 came out Match 7th 2012
The Apple TV 4 came out October 30th 2015
A total of 1333 days between the two generations.
Now if we just add 1333 days from The previous October release that would land us in mid June 2019. I think that's a totally acceptable date for "Around 2020" and wouldn't be historically out of character for Apple to wait such lengths given the previous product cycle.
Whatever the case.... If someone is on the fence about getting an apple TV hoping something better from Apple is right around the corner... it probably isn't. I wont expect anything this year or next. 2018 is a possibility.... but i'll place my bets on June 2019....
That gif only proves you are wrong. You have 200% increase on the height AND the width. That's 400%. Additionally, look at the file size increase. Nearly 400% (4x).Keep telling yourself that
http://gph.is/2vk3DFH
3 years lateUHD is FOUR TIMES the resolution of Full HD.
well you cant blame Apple for that now can you? not everybody is living in ISP hell like you are, and why should the rest of us, who Can and do have uncapped data, suffer because some people are stuck with companies like comcast?Where I live, if you want internet. You get Comcast. Period.
They are 400 bucks now. How low do you need them to go?????