The ethernet port is still only 10/100.
yeah that is pretty lame, it ought to be up to 1000 now.
Yeah, you are indeed right. That might be a limitation. Or a reason to get an Aiport Extreme instead. However, the only reason I did not get an Airport Extreme or a Time Capsule was the fact that it was lacking AirTunes. Weird that a more high end device does not contain the feature of a low end device...
There's really no need for gigabit.
I haven't read the entire thread, so could someone please explain how this product actually works? I don't quite get what it does.
Unless you want to use it in WDS mode and have something like a gigabit-capable NAS or a mini connected to it.
I haven't read the entire thread, so could someone please explain how this product actually works? I don't quite get what it does.
First, here's my setup. I have a Netgear CG814WG router that is the heart of my wireless network. (I have a weird house, and as such, it's impossible for us to have a wired setup, we can only use wireless.) Now, is there any way I can use the Express with my current network setup to allow a) more devices to connect and b) expand the actual range of the network? One of the computers in our house doesn't get a great connection, and I think if the network had a better range, it'd get better speeds. (The router is 802.11g, so even though my iMac has a 802.11n card, I can only get 54 Mbps.)
Yet neither the mini or a gig-e capable NAS will reach the theoretical throughput of Gig-E. Hard drive peak speeds (real world) are still much faster than Gig-E peak speeds (again real world).
Yes but the bottleneck will continue to be the 100baseT rather than the WiFi.
10/100 still exceeds "N" speed anyway (again real world testing). Moot point. You cannot look at theoretical throughputs to gauge this.
No. I regularly get 240+mbps (5GHz n) on my Extreme when transferring between my iMac and my MacBook.
using what, precisely to gauge that?
Large file transfer. I can get a 1GB file to transfer in ~30 sec.
My ISP told me the router only supports four connections, which designated as 192.168.0.10-.13, but I later extended this to .20 and haven't had any issues.Yes, you can use it. Are there limits to how many devices connect to your wireless router? If so, well, this will expand it by 10(?). On (b), yes, you can "bridge" from the first router to the second. Put the Express in a location where signal is decent. It will repeat the signal or relay it further along in the house.
Bah. Give me something with a real throughput number, not via drag and drop. That's all estimation.
Try rsync or ftp. 😛
My ISP told me the router only supports four connections, which designated as 192.168.0.10-.13, but I later extended this to .20 and haven't had any issues.
So, it sounds like I could make use of this Express then. Do I just plug it in and it automatically picks up my signal and repeats it? And then I can also make use of .21-.30?
Unless you want to use it in WDS mode and have something like a gigabit-capable NAS or a mini connected to it.
Yes but the bottleneck will continue to be the 100baseT rather than the WiFi.
Theoretical: 270Mbps n vs 100Mbps 100baseTBut isn't even base 100 ethernet enough to saturate N wireless? What is maximum real world throughput of each?
Will it? When I searched for benchmarks, the ones I found said that N was still only about half the speed of base 100 ethernet.
Theoretical: 270Mbps n vs 100Mbps 100baseT
I know that. I asked for real world benchmarks, you never see anything close to theoretical in actual use.
Benchmarks? I did find one where N was able to get to about 120 on one specific test.
In the 5GHz band, the AirPort Extreme can use a wide channel, employing twice the frequency as standard 802.11b and 802.11g channels. This enabled us to achieve a consistent rate of 140Mbps from the AirPort Extreme 802.11n network interface in an Intel Core 2 Duo Macintosh transmitting to a Gigabit Ethernet-equipped Mac attached to a LAN port on the base station.
US model $99
Aus Model $149
what a ripoff apple