Like I said, I like Samsung's Gear S web browser and keyboard. They got that part right. If Apple could take cues from that for the AW, that would be a dream come true. The negatives of Gear S are of course that you need a contract and different number with it and that it is a bit big. AW2 can take the web browser and keyboard design and fuse the two concepts together in a thinner and better watch and were golden.No what I'm asking you is HOW in the world putting a web browser on a 2" screen works. What exactly are you even able to do with it?
For that matter, how in the hell are you typing? Why is this a better solution than using a phone or a computer?
Like I said, I like Samsung's Gear S web browser and keyboard. They got that part right. If Apple could take cues from that for the AW, that would be a dream come true. The negatives of Gear S are of course that you need a contract and different number with it and that it is a bit big. AW2 can take the web browser and keyboard design and fuse the two concepts together in a thinner and better watch and were golden.
It doesn't even need to be thinner, just faster. Much, much faster. All the functions it has now would be so much more relevant if they were as fast (or faster) to do on the watch as the phone. The current S1 28nm SoC which is basically an underclocked iphone 4 is just too slow in many cases.
The watch already tries to do way more than it can practically, Samsung Gear is just insane geekery that has no relevance to the Apple watch. The Apple watch is jewelry, you can't say the same for samsung gear.
Camera's sound like a good idea until you realize that they film from your wrist and therefore have a weird under-chin point of view in most cases. There will be no camera on the AW2.
I wouldn't be surprised if the case changes were very, very subtle. I don't think you'll see much difference, physically, besides a few mm in thickness (maybe) and better materials. I bet they will pack some kind of A9-derived 14nm or 16nm SoC that is much more powerful than S1. S2 will be like iphone 5S speed levels.
It doesn't even need to be thinner, just faster. Much, much faster. All the functions it has now would be so much more relevant if they were as fast (or faster) to do on the watch as the phone. The current S1 28nm SoC which is basically an underclocked iphone 4 is just too slow in many cases.
The watch already tries to do way more than it can practically, Samsung Gear is just insane geekery that has no relevance to the Apple watch. The Apple watch is jewelry, you can't say the same for samsung gear.
Camera's sound like a good idea until you realize that they film from your wrist and therefore have a weird under-chin point of view in most cases. There will be no camera on the AW2.
I wouldn't be surprised if the case changes were very, very subtle. I don't think you'll see much difference, physically, besides a few mm in thickness (maybe) and better materials. I bet they will pack some kind of A9-derived 14nm or 16nm SoC that is much more powerful than S1. S2 will be like iphone 5S speed levels.
I have a 38mm w milanese loop and its the same. Most people don't notice at all. If I wear the brighter sports band though people notice it more.Yeah, outside of my hope that they keep the strap connection standard for at least a few models, making the Watch thinner would probably result in a smaller crown/button, which doesn't sound great. The thickness of the Apple Watch is already within the range of your standard sport mechanical watch, although it is a little thicker than a dress watch.
I have a 38mm model on the link bracelet, and it's pretty compact. Most people don't realize I'm even wearing a smartwatch.
I have a 38mm w milanese loop and its the same. Most people don't notice at all. If I wear the brighter sports band though people notice it more.
I think they might introduce a new model but my guess is it will not differ in dimensions much between the current cases. I'm sure bands will be backwards compatible too.
I don't think the processor is necessarily the problem. Its driving a tiny screen and running tiny apps. The lag is probably from inter-device communications with the iPhone, and apps not being written efficiently to do that. Bluetooth is pretty slow, and WiFi can occasionally have lag.
The apps I use on a regular basis on the watch are very quick. If I find one that isn't responding very quickly, then it I quickly kick it off the watch.
I wear my watch every night as my silent alarm and sleep tracking with sleep pulse. I charge my watch from 9-10pm as the only time I charge per day. I go to bed with a 100% charged watch and wake up with 91% because of sleep pulse or 95% without it. I finish the day with 40-50% at 9pm and it takes about an hour to charge.Better battery so I wear it all night and track my sleep. Sleep is pretty much the only thing my Apple Watch doest do. Waterproof would be nice but not a deal breaker.
True, it doesn't speak "left", "right", or street names, but at least it plays a tone for left or right: "ding-dong" for "left", and "dong-ding" for "right". The sounds are like how pitches are arranged on a piano keyboard.I just want it to read directions from maps. If I'm using it for GPS, I'm not wanting to risk reading the tiny screen.
Not legal to use cellphone in our city. Would be nice to use the speaker for directions from the watch.