I suspect it has something to do with the fact Apple Watch is nearing the 1 year anniversary so, following the Christmas rush, people are waiting for version 2.
[doublepost=1461848536][/doublepost]I disagree, Apple Watches are every where, I haven't seen a single Android Wear anywhere except for two stores that have it on sale.
Make it cheaper.
Problem solved.
Nobody cares about these creepy watches, when are the new MBPs coming is what matters !!
This thing needs to be able to function totally without your phone nearby.
Sorry but sales equals market share...then leads to profits. The more sales.....the more market share. They go hand in hand. You need to have sales to gain market share and those two add to profits.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_share
Losing share. As in Android Wear watches are actually selling at all now. The overall market is growing. Unless Android Wear *never* starts selling in reasonable quantities , just mathematically Apple is going to lose share. That doesn't mean that they're selling fewer watches.
This sounds reasonable.Sport model - starts at 199 for 38 and 249 for 42
steinless - states at 349 for 38 and 449 for 42
29 silicon and nylon bands
69 all leather bands
119 stainless bands
thats it.
to a definitively larger users base
Make it cheaper.
Problem solved.
I agree to a point....but if you have smaller sales/market share then you will have smaller profits. Aren't all businesses plans to make more profits? Even if you have large profit margins from your products you still need sales to make that profit. If sales/market share decreses so does profits.I'm not sure what business experience you have, but your reply that sales equal market share which then leads to profits is absolutely not correct.
You can have sales in small numbers (low market share) that still provides for a profitable business. The idea that you need to gain market share by selling for less money and less profit, because the volume makes up for the lower margin is a recipe for disaster as we have seen with countless businesses.
I love how when Apple releases a wearable, the narrative is "Wearables are useless. Nobody wants wearables. Just use your phone!", but with Android wearables it's complete opposite. I've never once seen an "Android Wear is a dud." story in the tech media, much less a "Nobody needs Android on their wrist" story. Not once. And now that wearables are catching on a bit, it's all about how Android Wear is bad for Apple Watch.
By the tech media's estimate, no wearable Apple makes now or in the future has a point because nobody wants a tiny computer on their wrist. At the same time, Apple better catch up on market share in wearables because here comes Android!
Apple can never win in the PR game, because there's too much money in bashing them. This site is just as guilty of it as anywhere else.
I agree to a point....but if you have smaller sales/market share then you will have smaller profits. Aren't all businesses plans to make more profits? Even if you have large profit margins from your products you still need sales to make that profit. If sales/market share decreses so does profits.
It is! But, doesn't matter at all.It means apple is not catching up with the market growth. It is that simple.
Ah specs. The "I have 3 gigapoinks" vs "I don't really see a problem with my phone" discussion. The fight the girlfriends always win but never get the gloryMake everything even more thin with minimal specs, Apple. At least that appears to be your obsession and modus operandi for trying to capture the attention of the consumer.![]()
New requirement that app must now run natively on the watch.This thing needs to be able to function totally without your phone nearby.
Once it has that and GPS features I would consider it.
FaceTime camera, expanded Wi-Fi abilities, andcellular connectivity. New bands, finishes, and models are always a possibility as well.
Sport model - starts at 199 for 38 and 249 for 42
steinless - states at 349 for 38 and 449 for 42
29 silicon and nylon bands
69 all leather bands
119 stainless bands
thats it.
You don't get what they're trying to do. They want more health info -for everyone- even the ones that don't know it yet. But mainly they want people to go back for the thing if they forgot it at home. Even if they can't pinpoint why that is exactly.All of these rumors of enhancements are more of the same that we ALREADY have. New bands and finishes won't promote more sales either. What wearables needs is to give it utility that we didn't have before. The first iphone put the internet in our hands in an extremely easy way (albeit slow). What do wearables do? They need to provide new information, and the new information is health info!
Timmy said this thing is revolutionary, but he wouldn't know revolutionary if it hit him in the head!
I'm not sure what business experience you have, but your reply that sales equal market share which then leads to profits is absolutely not correct.
You can have sales in small numbers (low market share) that still provides for a profitable business. The idea that you need to gain market share by selling for less money and less profit, because the volume makes up for the lower margin is a recipe for disaster as we have seen with countless businesses.