Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You are correct and I do this. However, it is not uncommon for me to jump around playlists, podcasts, and streaming live news and music during the day. I rarely have all the media I want during the day on my watch.

Gotcha, I guess in my situation I would only not want to carry my phone if I'm exercising (hour at most a day) and would just update my playlist periodically. Also don't want to pay the ridiculous amount per month that Canadian cell providers will probably charge for LTE on the watch either.
 
So it sounds like all carriers are charging 10 bucks, right? I was kind of hoping T-Mobile might step up to the plate.
 
Does anyone know if this works with the MVNOs for the Big 4? I use Teltik (T-Mobile network) and would love to put an AppleWatch on this. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
God I hate The Verge. LTE on the Watch is killer. Apple Music over LTE on Watch is killer. Always available Siri is killer. Constantly being data-connected is killer.

But yeah, if your imagination literally stretches to taking phone calls on the Watch, what is the point?
 
Gotcha, I guess in my situation I would only not want to carry my phone if I'm exercising (hour at most a day) and would just update my playlist periodically. Also don't want to pay the ridiculous amount per month that Canadian cell providers will probably charge for LTE on the watch either.
Can't remember where I saw it, but I heard it was only $5 Canadian.
 
Serious question, do you take your phone with you right now when you run? I couldn't imagine taking calls and trying to respond to text messages when I'm out running. This is why the series 3 doesn't do anything for me that my series 2 doesn't. My workouts are the only times when I'm wearing my watch but don't have access to my phone. People have been screaming for this feature for a while though so I'm sure there's a market for it.
Yeah, I do take my phone when I run. I want to track my run and listen to music (don’t like running to the sound of my labouring breath). I know the GPS only version will learn over time and I can store some music on it but I don’t want to chop and change all the time. Would rather have my music available on the fly.

I’m not screaming for this LTE bidness as I wanted a watch and waited for the latest itiration before “getting it” but the addition of LTE is a nice little cherry on top (Why I thought of Xenia Onatopp when I wrote that is beyond me). Also, I’ll be able to glance down and see my progress along with adding in my exercises in between the runs and readily change music from Killswitch Engage to Lamb of God or Gojira depending on how hard I want to hurt myself...
 
You have both those options, plus the series 2 allows you to stream from the content on your phone via Bluetooth. So probably three methods.

Why would you stream content from your phone to your watch via bluetooth? Wouldn't you just stream from your phone to your earbuds/headset? What is the "middleman" watch providing?
 
I have gone through the article and this thread and other than forum members complaining about $10/month data access charges, I have seen no evidence of this. Does anyone have carrie proof of the watch being a $10 charge?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tooloud10
Not really sure how they can charge us another $10/month when the watch and phone share the same phone number.

That's funny! You're not sure how the phone company can nickel and dime us to death for every little thing? They do it because THEY CAN! (except TMobile...they care about us at least a little bit...)
 
If they stopped selling this as a stand alone device rather than an iPhone accessory I could see this feature being more beneficial. Making setup and app installs all done on the watch could open a whole new market of people wanting a decent smart watch and fitness tracker but don’t have android.

This is true. I also think right now it would best used if you forget your phone and home or just want to run around without your phone.

For me I would like to leave my phone charging at my work desk without worrying if I would miss a call from the mrs--- good for people with little ones.
 
I went into today's keynote with the mindset that I was going to buy the Series 3. The same oversized design and no support for Rogers LTE in Canada, left me no choice but to hold off until Series 4. The WiFi-only watch is nothing more than a Series 2S. The red dot on the crown sticks out like a sore pimple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheMountainLife
Last year's meme: "Hain't nobody gonna buy no Apple watch 'cause it ain't got no LTE like Samsung."

This year's meme: "Why in the heck did they put LTE on the Apple watch? Hain't nobody gonna buy that."
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
For me--age 70--the ability to insure I cam make an emergency call is worth $120 a year.

(My Apple Watch series 1 is my favorite device in 33 years of Apple products.)
I wanted a smaller SE as my secondary phone to take to the gym, hiking, jogging, and boy does this fit the bill and more.
And cheaper cellular bill to boot.
 
Like others I would buy this in a heartbeat if the LTE charge wasn't straight up robbery.

After 3 years of data and the cost of the watch I'm looking at $360 data plus taxes plus a $500 watch pluS taxes = close to $1000.

$1000 to use a watch for 3 years!
[doublepost=1505263860][/doublepost]Now do that calculation for three years with an iPhone. :D
 
I'm thinking this is s bigger deal than the article author think it is. What they did today could have possibly just marked the watch as a successor to the iPhone itself.

Don't get me wrong, I love my Watch, but in no way does it even come close to replacing my phone. There's zero web browsing capability (even if there was, how awful would that be?), replying to text messages is a pain, most of the apps that people use daily are a total no-go. What it does, it does very well, but you can't expect a 42mm screen to be a competent replacement for a phone.
 
I like the watch and will be ordering one Friday. I wish it didn’t have the red dot. I think that takes away from how it looks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nekonokami
The biggest question is: can it get any bigger or uglier on the wrist?

apple_watch_3_screen-800x533.jpg
[doublepost=1505264931][/doublepost]That wrist is tiny. Like that of a 5 year old. The 42mm looks small on my wrist. But then again, I'm a man.
[doublepost=1505264999][/doublepost]
I like the watch and will be ordering one Friday. I wish it didn’t have the red dot. I think that takes away from how it looks.
Just hit it with a black sharpie.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zed1291
Apple watch LTE looks like it would be like your older gen. Apple watch to your iPhone, or iPad to Mac..... Its not a replacement, but its convenient.

A "game-changer" i wouldn't see a LTE watch as... u still need a phone for most things anyway.
 
Why would you stream content from your phone to your watch via bluetooth? Wouldn't you just stream from your phone to your earbuds/headset? What is the "middleman" watch providing?
Looked at my watch to confirm. You're right. Its a control feature. If you're listening to the playlist on your watch and then want to switch to one on your phone, it starts playing through your phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.