This is the only -gate I want to see catch on.
All these "waterproof" implications are a disservice to the community. All they show is that the watch will tend to be fully functional after a period of time under water. However, even if electronics survive the initial plunge, it doesn't mean the water intrusion won't continue to work against the guts of the watch if any got inside. Apple has stated explicitly that this thing is NOT waterproof and recommended against even some scenarios where water resistance (not proofing) should be avoided or minimized.
Every one of these "it's waterproof"-type suggestions should have an asterisk with the fine print saying "check back in a few days, a week or two and a month because implied results may not be representative of actual results with a little passage of time".
A flooded house can have the internal visible parts cleaned up to look as good as new. But the water intrusion is probably also working behind the walls, growing mold over a period of time.
Irradiated humans can seem fine right after exposure. It's only some time later that their hair starts falling out and the other effects of radiation poisoning show.
Water intrusion in electronics is not always immediately & obviously damaging. But mix that intrusion with a little passage of time and see what you get.
Apple has said "NOT waterproof". 50 posts of "I sent mine down to the Titanic and it's still working" doesn't make it reliably waterproof. All that each of these scenarios implies is short-term luck... like the guy who claims his flooded house is "back to new" after the flood or the radiated people "are fine" immediately after the event. Check back again some time later and see if that luck persists or if the reality of chemistry and physics have set in.
The original idiots.
Apart from the Boiling water, and drop on the floor, which I thought were worthwhile in that they actually told you something.
boiling actually makes me optimistic. I have a hot tub, and I wasn't even considering daring to wear it in there, but if it can be boiled, I can't imagine a hot tub would do much damage... hmmm...
My reaction:
that's the new trend these days...waste a sub 1k gadget doing such gimmicks, millions of hits and truckloads of ad revenue.
Last I heard the "bendgate" guy is a millionaire now.
That's what I did during the cheese grater part! I cringed.
I thought these torture tests were supposed to be real life test! When are you ever going to rub your wrist against a cheese grater in real life!?
----------
Starving people everywhere and she wastes all that food/those condiments. SHAME!
She makes me very nervous the way she uses that knife. She seems kind of careless in her review while thinking it's comical.
I mean it's not a bad review, but why not just be serious and treat it like a serious review?
in real life no cheese grater, sure, but you might rub it on the wall or something rough like that. It's just to show you that it's not that easy to scratch it.
Most of us take the odd stupid pill but these people were taking them by the hand full. The only thing she forgot was to put it in the crapper then fish it out.
For the first time ever, I'm actually impressed. It seemed to endure water, spillages, scratching and drops.
that's the new trend these days...waste a sub 1k gadget doing such gimmicks, millions of hits and truckloads of ad revenue.
Last I heard the "bendgate" guy is a millionaire now.