Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
My wife's iPhone 6 has been draining battery like crazy. It stays in the charger all night long and it shows 100% in the morning. She drives 20 minutes to work and without even using it it gets down to 30% by the time she gets to her office. She took it to Apple 2 weeks ago and the Genius said the battery was good at 85% of its life. :( Well, today she called the store to get an appointment to replace it after the news she can get it replaced for $29. First appointment available is for next week as she was told everyone is calling in to get a new battery.

Question: if you have a 1 or 2 year old phone that has no battery issues, should you get a new one for $29 just to have a new battery?
 
People on this forum are soooo dumb. The feature that prolongs your phone’s life is here to stay. And now that everyone knows exactly how it works, there’s no more whining to be had.

We do NOT know exactly how it works yet. But Apple will have to give more details during any trials.

Has anyone noticed that Google has refused to comment on whether or not they throttle when a battery goes bad? Samsung said they don’t, but they could technically be telling the truth if the code is from Google

This is not about a battery “going bad”. That’s handwaving. It’s about when and why current based throttling is enabled.

Google doesn’t have to say anything. Much of Android is Open Source, after all. Yes, Android phones throttle when necessary, but as the major makers have stated, they do not enable current based throttling because of battery age like Apple does.

They also don’t enable that throttle above charge levels of 10-40% (depending on make), also apparently unlike Apple.

I don’t automatically think Apple upper management was conspiring, but I do wonder who at a lower level decided this way was necessary... and why. And then why upper management backs it. We’re probably missing some critical piece of iDevice specific info.
 
Last edited:
Well it’s all in how you say it. If it were me, I’d walk in and say:

“So I have this iPhone 6, (6S, whatever it was) and the display is slightly cracked but I’ve noticed my battery is defective, isn’t it part of that recall you guys have issued? Is there any way I can schedule to have my battery replaced but retain my display? I really don’t have the cash right now for an entirely new display, and to be honest I was thinking of maybe looking at the Galaxy 8, I’m just very nervous about my battery now and I don’t know if I trust that this issue won’t reoccur”


The trick is in sounding firm, but also playing 60/40 in smart/dumb. You can’t act like you know it all, but throwing buzz words around as you act “dumb” would certainly do the trick.

If OP goes in and just asks for a battery replacement, they’re gonna say the screen has to be paid for first.

Ha, this is totally true and the exact method that I use. You have to be polite but act mildly dumb about how things work while throwing out just enough jargon that they think you might know what you're talking about--kinda 'country bumpkin'-ish, but one that is reasonably familiar with smartphones.

They'll give you whatever you want if they feel a bit sorry for you but think there's a chance you'll know when they're trying to screw you. I can't believe anyone gets aggressive with retail people any more--I'm in sales and I just shut down and go completely by the book when anyone gets super mad like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bawstun
They replaced my battery in March for my 6s and within 5 months it was in the unusable state. I upgraded hardware as a result two weeks before this came out. I’m seriously upset over paying for new hardware when all I needed was another battery.

if you choose to upgrade instead of seeking support, and it sounds like you did, then that's on you not Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: artfossil
Dunno if it’s after a restore or not, but someone’s video here:

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...lth-info-in-ios.2097894/page-89#post-25664475

May or may not be pertinent.

I would say no. This brief demo does not indicate whether or not this issue is iOS 11 related or some other bug or do to this battery throttling. I have had similar sluggishness on my iPhone 6 Plus, but I haven’t really suffered from the battery throttling. As I indicated earlier my performance has improved with subsequent iOS 11 update. I really think the problem is with iOS 11 in this battery throttling issue is just a red herring. I’m not saying that makes it any better, because it’s still apples problem.

I repeat, turning on Low Power Mode significantly ramps down my processing speed, but doesn’t really have a noticeable effect on lag through the system. I would suspect similar behavior from this battery throttling issue
 
You aren’t wrong. Apple will lose each and every lawsuit brought against them for this, and they know it. That’s why they’ve gradually done more and more to replace batteries, it’s just saving face for when they lose their cases and have to pay out to every iPhone buyer since 10.2, and for when they fire Tim Cook.
It’s funny you actually believe they will have any big financial impact as a result and that they’ll fire the outstanding Tim Cook.

Unless this is a troll account, I can’t even take you seriously. If it is, well done.
 
if you choose to upgrade instead of seeking support, and it sounds like you did, then that's on you not Apple.

No.

First, Apple throttles the CPU well above the 80% that Apple still considers the battery "Healthy" and won't replace.

Second, Apple didn't disclose any of the throttling based on battery information to the user or even Apple techs. So even if they took it in and said it performs poorly, they'll have said it's fine and there's nothing that can be done.
 
Post is not quite 2 hours old here and folks are still whining. You got what you wanted, a battery replacement on request with no diagnostics required. Sheesh.

This thread is a great example of folks feeling entitled.
so is this post -- seems like anyone with an opinion you disagree with is whining
 
It’s funny you actually believe they will have any big financial impact as a result and that they’ll fire the outstanding Tim Cook.

Unless this is a troll account, I can’t even take you seriously. If it is, well done.

I stand behind everything I post. Not a troll account at all. Apple will lose multiple billions of dollars and the shareholders will panic and Tim Cook will be let go for his mishandling of it all. You will see.
 
How did I miss this thread? This is good news. I hope it applies to 8 and 8 plus.

From a consumer's point of view one the most disconcerting details of the whole throttle gate was people reported being refused batteries replacement even if they were willing to pay.
 
Last edited:
There was a developer on one of the other threads about this same issue and said that Geekbench doesn't use idle time like a standard app would (including games) in combination with power management. I also doubt that games like Infinity Blade 3 are going to be running the GPU and CPU at maximum all the time either. However, intensive games like that might be able to cause problems when the battery drops into the low power range of 20% or less charge and the available voltage starts to drop steeply.

It's a benchmarking tool..... maybe by the end of 2018, you might realise geekbench has nothing to do with his throttling being a really bad decision by Apple , and it was just a tool to prove the throttling existed. One does not have to use geekbench to have throttling..... what you are trying to prove is ridiculous, that if you don't run something like geekbench , this throttling is a non issue.

I've already had an exchange with the developer who you are quoting, and you are ignoring our follow up conversation. Stop the pathetic cherry picking of info on these forums while ignoring the facts.

Everyone one of just posts just boils down to ...battery....EOL.... 20%..... geekbench bad....

Deflect all you want - no **** people do not run thier iPhone under geekbench conditions..... Apple is throttling your phones. And drop the 20% EOL , cause frankly you or anyone else does not know the exact conditions under which Apple has written the software to throttle. It's all assumptions right now, and the amount of links you have added to your threads that are not relevant , in understanding the actual issue, I would suggest you actually sit down and start with the basics of how CPUs draw power, how batteries supply power and how a benching program works . Invest less time just spamming the Same EOL, 20% message post after post . This Is a great opportunity to learn something .... my 2 cents worth
[doublepost=1514962693][/doublepost]
How did I miss this thread? This is good news. I hope it applies to 8 and 8 plus.

Nope. Those are not covered.
 
:confused::(:(
It's a benchmarking tool..... maybe by the end of 2018, you might realise geekbench has nothing to do with his throttling being a really bad decision by Apple , and it was just a tool to prove the throttling existed. One does not have to use geekbench to have throttling..... what you are trying to prove is ridiculous, that if you don't run something like geekbench , this throttling is a non issue.

I've already had an exchange with the developer who you are quoting, and you are ignoring our follow up conversation. Stop the pathetic cherry picking of info on these forums while ignoring the facts.

Everyone one of just posts just boils down to ...battery....EOL.... 20%..... geekbench bad....

Deflect all you want - no **** people do not run thier iPhone under geekbench conditions..... Apple is throttling your phones. And drop the 20% EOL , cause frankly you or anyone else does not know the exact conditions under which Apple has written the software to throttle. It's all assumptions right now, and the amount of links you have added to your threads that are not relevant , in understanding the actual issue, I would suggest you actually sit down and start with the basics of how CPUs draw power, how batteries supply power and how a benching program works . Invest less time just spamming the Same EOL, 20% message post after post . This Is a great opportunity to learn something .... my 2 cents worth
[doublepost=1514962693][/doublepost]

Nope. Those are not covered.

Darn! :(
 
Seems you missed my point, or more likely, chose to ignore it intentionally.

I don’t hang out on forums catering to products I do not own.

Seemed you missed my point, neither do I, that is I am here because I own Apple products.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MH01
Here is the catch, if your iPhone has ever touched water or has minor scratch etc something up with screen or other minor defect, they will say the phone is “defective” and won’t change your battery even if phone works perfectly. They don’t work on defective phones. My iPhone had touched water apparently at some point so they wouldn’t change my iPhone battery even though diagnostics they ran said battery was defective. Had to change battery myself. A lot of people are going to leave disappointed, because surely their older iPhone has some kind of minor defect. Apple is not gonna take the chance of opening your phone. Again, a lot of people are going to be leaving disappointed thinking they were going to get a new battery!!!
What you’re talking about is considered physical damage. If the liquid contact indicators (LCI) on the phone have been tripped there are NO repairs that can be done. There is a chance that the liquid that was inside the phone may have caused internal damage. A battery replacement may fail if there is internal liquid damage. As for the “scratches” you mentioned... Apple will perform a repair on a phone as long as the phone turns on, there is no liquid damage, the rear camera glass is not cracked and the casing of the phone is not bent. If you had a cracked display they would have been able to first replace the screen and then fixed the battery (all in the same repair- the screen needs to be removed to replace the battery. If the screen is cracked, removing it will cause more damage and may leave it in an unusable state post-repair. Therefore all repairs must have a functioning screen or Apple will offer to replace the screen as well).
 
How did I miss this thread? This is good news. I hope it applies to 8 and 8 plus.

From a consumer's point of view one the most disconcerting details of the whole throttle gate was people reported being refused batteries replacement even if they were willing to pay.

Agreed. I don't mind the throttling, I do mind though being told that I cannot replace a battery in a device I own. This to me really does help apple denying pushing people to upgrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makayla and 5105973
They are actually are advertising in their Keynotes the speed of the processor speed relative to the "older" iPhones inside the newest iPhone. It is part of their sales pitch.

Not sure about the other jurisdictions, but in Australia, one does need an intent in order to be in breach of consumer law. Just recently, ACCC (Australian consumer watchdog) forced broadband providers to refund customers for falsely advertising connections speeds compared to actual speeds consumers were getting in real life.

Whilst the connections were theoretically capable of delivering the advertised speeds (and were delivering when there were few users), in reality, as they crammed more consumers, the infrastructure wasn't able to sustain the advertised speed. In most cases, providers didn't buy enough capacity from the wholesalers to provide adequate capability to deliver the service.

ACCC found that by advertising max speed without adequate capability to deliver the providers were misleading consumers and forced them to provide refunds.

No need to prove the intent.

I see similarity here. Apple advertising CPU performance without providing adequate battery capacity to sustain user experience beyond 1 year.

Before anyone saying that Apple's products are covered only by 1 year warranty, it might be true elsewhere. In Australia, ACCC and Apple came to an agreement that warranty will cover as a minimum 2 years

See here
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-relea...ts-consumer-guarantees-policies-and-practices



Recently, ACCC also were successful in forcing Apple to backpedal on Error 57 issues
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-relea...misleading-consumer-guarantee-representations

I would almost go as far as saying, if there is a smoking gun, then it would be dealt under a criminal law.

Again, this is just my 2c and I could be wrong.

Well said, and this is a very similar situation in the EU. I suspect Apple knows that they have a huge issue , that could turn into one of the biggest product claims of all time......

Bad year for Apple and Intel . Going to take a long time to build up the good will again.
[doublepost=1514976030][/doublepost]
Sure but it’s still quite vague. Like 2x or 40%. It’s not a geekbench score or it only takes 1 second to open an app. And there’s so many variables involved it’s impoosible to say Apple’s advertising is deceptive or they’re outright lying when it comes to performance.

It's advertising, of course it's deceptive and lieing , it's just a question of how much :p

Unless you actually believe in magic..... otherwise one can can come to a conclusion that apple's pushes the boundaries when it comes to ads ;)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ulenspiegel
With my previous two iPhones, whether I had cause to complain or not, I would go into the Apple store a week or two before the warranty was up and complain about "performance and battery issues". And every time they would just swap my phone out and give me a "fresh" phone (most likely a refurbished phone with new battery).

I thought I was being a jerk for using the warranty to get a new phone but this latest revelation proved me right in what I was doing.

I bought the SE last year and it's the first time I didn't go back and try to get a new phone with a new battery under warranty and boy do I regret it.:(
 
And drop the 20% EOL , cause frankly you or anyone else does not know the exact conditions under which Apple has written the software to throttle.

But the general condition is definitely known: large peaks/valleys in power draw relative to voltage remaining.
That is what iOS is now programmed to monitor the system for and smooth out if it occurs.

Is it possible to know every possible combination of functions relative to voltage that might trigger that type of behavior? No. But you can say what the most likely battery state is required to trigger it, and that's the info that Apple has provided: old battery (EOL), low charge battery (voltage drops below nominal), or cold battery. In all those situations, the voltage supply isn't going to be as predictable, thus the significantly increased likelihood of the battery not being able to supply the current the CPU needs.

And here are the "basics" of CPU power draw in combination with lithium ion batteries...

http://appleinsider.com/articles/18...k-and-how-apple-manages-performance-over-time
 
  • Like
Reactions: artfossil
My wife's iPhone 6 has been draining battery like crazy. It stays in the charger all night long and it shows 100% in the morning. She drives 20 minutes to work and without even using it it gets down to 30% by the time she gets to her office. She took it to Apple 2 weeks ago and the Genius said the battery was good at 85% of its life. :( Well, today she called the store to get an appointment to replace it after the news she can get it replaced for $29. First appointment available is for next week as she was told everyone is calling in to get a new battery.

Question: if you have a 1 or 2 year old phone that has no battery issues, should you get a new one for $29 just to have a new battery?
I don’t know, that’s a good question.

I’ve been on an iPhone X for the last few weeks. I just put the sim back in my 7 Plus yesterday. I just woke up and took my iPhone 7 Plus off the charger about 15 minutes ago and started reading this thread while getting warmed up to get ready to start my day. My battery has dropped 3% on less than 25%brightness. That’s faster than it used to drop. I need another day to get a feel for it but my battery definitely drains faster than this time last year when it was brand new.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.