People on this forum are soooo dumb. The feature that prolongs your phone’s life is here to stay. And now that everyone knows exactly how it works, there’s no more whining to be had.
Has anyone noticed that Google has refused to comment on whether or not they throttle when a battery goes bad? Samsung said they don’t, but they could technically be telling the truth if the code is from Google
We do NOT know exactly how it works yet. But Apple will have to give more details during any trials.
.
Well it’s all in how you say it. If it were me, I’d walk in and say:
“So I have this iPhone 6, (6S, whatever it was) and the display is slightly cracked but I’ve noticed my battery is defective, isn’t it part of that recall you guys have issued? Is there any way I can schedule to have my battery replaced but retain my display? I really don’t have the cash right now for an entirely new display, and to be honest I was thinking of maybe looking at the Galaxy 8, I’m just very nervous about my battery now and I don’t know if I trust that this issue won’t reoccur”
The trick is in sounding firm, but also playing 60/40 in smart/dumb. You can’t act like you know it all, but throwing buzz words around as you act “dumb” would certainly do the trick.
If OP goes in and just asks for a battery replacement, they’re gonna say the screen has to be paid for first.
They replaced my battery in March for my 6s and within 5 months it was in the unusable state. I upgraded hardware as a result two weeks before this came out. I’m seriously upset over paying for new hardware when all I needed was another battery.
Dunno if it’s after a restore or not, but someone’s video here:
https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...lth-info-in-ios.2097894/page-89#post-25664475
May or may not be pertinent.
It’s funny you actually believe they will have any big financial impact as a result and that they’ll fire the outstanding Tim Cook.You aren’t wrong. Apple will lose each and every lawsuit brought against them for this, and they know it. That’s why they’ve gradually done more and more to replace batteries, it’s just saving face for when they lose their cases and have to pay out to every iPhone buyer since 10.2, and for when they fire Tim Cook.
if you choose to upgrade instead of seeking support, and it sounds like you did, then that's on you not Apple.
so is this post -- seems like anyone with an opinion you disagree with is whiningPost is not quite 2 hours old here and folks are still whining. You got what you wanted, a battery replacement on request with no diagnostics required. Sheesh.
This thread is a great example of folks feeling entitled.
It’s funny you actually believe they will have any big financial impact as a result and that they’ll fire the outstanding Tim Cook.
Unless this is a troll account, I can’t even take you seriously. If it is, well done.
There was a developer on one of the other threads about this same issue and said that Geekbench doesn't use idle time like a standard app would (including games) in combination with power management. I also doubt that games like Infinity Blade 3 are going to be running the GPU and CPU at maximum all the time either. However, intensive games like that might be able to cause problems when the battery drops into the low power range of 20% or less charge and the available voltage starts to drop steeply.
How did I miss this thread? This is good news. I hope it applies to 8 and 8 plus.
It's a benchmarking tool..... maybe by the end of 2018, you might realise geekbench has nothing to do with his throttling being a really bad decision by Apple , and it was just a tool to prove the throttling existed. One does not have to use geekbench to have throttling..... what you are trying to prove is ridiculous, that if you don't run something like geekbench , this throttling is a non issue.
I've already had an exchange with the developer who you are quoting, and you are ignoring our follow up conversation. Stop the pathetic cherry picking of info on these forums while ignoring the facts.
Everyone one of just posts just boils down to ...battery....EOL.... 20%..... geekbench bad....
Deflect all you want - no **** people do not run thier iPhone under geekbench conditions..... Apple is throttling your phones. And drop the 20% EOL , cause frankly you or anyone else does not know the exact conditions under which Apple has written the software to throttle. It's all assumptions right now, and the amount of links you have added to your threads that are not relevant , in understanding the actual issue, I would suggest you actually sit down and start with the basics of how CPUs draw power, how batteries supply power and how a benching program works . Invest less time just spamming the Same EOL, 20% message post after post . This Is a great opportunity to learn something .... my 2 cents worth
[doublepost=1514962693][/doublepost]
Nope. Those are not covered.
Seems you missed my point, or more likely, chose to ignore it intentionally.
I don’t hang out on forums catering to products I do not own.
What you’re talking about is considered physical damage. If the liquid contact indicators (LCI) on the phone have been tripped there are NO repairs that can be done. There is a chance that the liquid that was inside the phone may have caused internal damage. A battery replacement may fail if there is internal liquid damage. As for the “scratches” you mentioned... Apple will perform a repair on a phone as long as the phone turns on, there is no liquid damage, the rear camera glass is not cracked and the casing of the phone is not bent. If you had a cracked display they would have been able to first replace the screen and then fixed the battery (all in the same repair- the screen needs to be removed to replace the battery. If the screen is cracked, removing it will cause more damage and may leave it in an unusable state post-repair. Therefore all repairs must have a functioning screen or Apple will offer to replace the screen as well).Here is the catch, if your iPhone has ever touched water or has minor scratch etc something up with screen or other minor defect, they will say the phone is “defective” and won’t change your battery even if phone works perfectly. They don’t work on defective phones. My iPhone had touched water apparently at some point so they wouldn’t change my iPhone battery even though diagnostics they ran said battery was defective. Had to change battery myself. A lot of people are going to leave disappointed, because surely their older iPhone has some kind of minor defect. Apple is not gonna take the chance of opening your phone. Again, a lot of people are going to be leaving disappointed thinking they were going to get a new battery!!!
How did I miss this thread? This is good news. I hope it applies to 8 and 8 plus.
From a consumer's point of view one the most disconcerting details of the whole throttle gate was people reported being refused batteries replacement even if they were willing to pay.
Totally, this. iMessage is just so well integrated with SMS and the vast majority of people I know use it...
It's worldwide. There's a link to this message and apology on the Apple UK homepage. The same statement is also on the Canadian site.apple has made official statement for this or it is just a fake. It will replace battery for all country iphone or ipad or just usa. what about canada and uk iphone ipad.
They are actually are advertising in their Keynotes the speed of the processor speed relative to the "older" iPhones inside the newest iPhone. It is part of their sales pitch.
Not sure about the other jurisdictions, but in Australia, one does need an intent in order to be in breach of consumer law. Just recently, ACCC (Australian consumer watchdog) forced broadband providers to refund customers for falsely advertising connections speeds compared to actual speeds consumers were getting in real life.
Whilst the connections were theoretically capable of delivering the advertised speeds (and were delivering when there were few users), in reality, as they crammed more consumers, the infrastructure wasn't able to sustain the advertised speed. In most cases, providers didn't buy enough capacity from the wholesalers to provide adequate capability to deliver the service.
ACCC found that by advertising max speed without adequate capability to deliver the providers were misleading consumers and forced them to provide refunds.
No need to prove the intent.
I see similarity here. Apple advertising CPU performance without providing adequate battery capacity to sustain user experience beyond 1 year.
Before anyone saying that Apple's products are covered only by 1 year warranty, it might be true elsewhere. In Australia, ACCC and Apple came to an agreement that warranty will cover as a minimum 2 years
See here
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-relea...ts-consumer-guarantees-policies-and-practices
Recently, ACCC also were successful in forcing Apple to backpedal on Error 57 issues
https://www.accc.gov.au/media-relea...misleading-consumer-guarantee-representations
I would almost go as far as saying, if there is a smoking gun, then it would be dealt under a criminal law.
Again, this is just my 2c and I could be wrong.
Sure but it’s still quite vague. Like 2x or 40%. It’s not a geekbench score or it only takes 1 second to open an app. And there’s so many variables involved it’s impoosible to say Apple’s advertising is deceptive or they’re outright lying when it comes to performance.
And drop the 20% EOL , cause frankly you or anyone else does not know the exact conditions under which Apple has written the software to throttle.
I don’t know, that’s a good question.My wife's iPhone 6 has been draining battery like crazy. It stays in the charger all night long and it shows 100% in the morning. She drives 20 minutes to work and without even using it it gets down to 30% by the time she gets to her office. She took it to Apple 2 weeks ago and the Genius said the battery was good at 85% of its life.Well, today she called the store to get an appointment to replace it after the news she can get it replaced for $29. First appointment available is for next week as she was told everyone is calling in to get a new battery.
Question: if you have a 1 or 2 year old phone that has no battery issues, should you get a new one for $29 just to have a new battery?
I didn’t say a single word about Apple. Shows where your bias is.
[doublepost=1514941668][/doublepost]
They may simply measure delta-I.