The product of the decade wasn't Vista????
But it took a decade to build!!!!!!!
I'm surprised it didn't take them another decade to get rid of them...
The product of the decade wasn't Vista????
But it took a decade to build!!!!!!!
No, it doesn't. Bogusky's Laptop Hunter ads weren't his only project over the past ten years. In fact, that article doesn't even mention Laptop Hunters or Microsoft. It's much more concerned with his Burger King work! Bogusky has built up quite a portfolio over the past decade.
Keep trying.
Linking to a John C. Dvorak article on PC Magazine...
It's even more ironic, when one of the most notorious Apple Hater/Microsoft Lovers writes: Microsoft's Negative Brand Image Gets Worse in PC magazine, within the same year.
"Sucks less" is indeed considered high praise, in this context.
I wonder what the next decade will bring!
1. Windows 8
2. Streaming iVid (which will suck less)
3. The other cube
4. OS 10.7.0 which is not stable until 10.7.3
5. OSX Touch Tablet/Finder/Convergence/Bug Report
6. Heads up display, voice control, wireless power (airpower-tm)
7. 16 cores, 4 of which are actually useable at a time.
8. A living space consisting of an Apple product, a futon, a formerly interesting spouse, two speakers, and a wireless router/port. An outdoors experience which is a tiny fraction as interesting as the inside virtual one. Go inside. The graphics are amazing.
Merely Rocketman
I would add the beloved Powerbook G3 Pismo to that list. Two highly customizable expansion bays, FW400, decent display, rugged chassis, great Airport reception, and the sexy "Batman's Laptop" contoured body.
For 90% of what people do with laptops, that baby would still be totally functional today. I'd still be using mine if my black lab hadn't tripped over the power cord and wrecked the display. Pre-MagSafe. (sigh).
2. Streaming 1080p
4. 10.7 (64 bit, top to bottom)
Hopefully not from Apple, so that we'll get it at the 40 Mbps that will give us Blu-ray quality.
Apple's been advertising "64-bit" even before they actually had a single line of 64-bit userland software.
I'm sure that "64-bit" in 10.7 will have a footnote pointing to a list of items where OSX is less "64-bit" than Windows. (And a list of Apple systems with 64-bit Intel processors that Apple won't support *at all* in 10.7).
Basing the future of one point in history is a bit stupid. Its like trying to draw a graph with only one Cartesian point and the only hint is that it has a gradient.
The "stupid" thing was DMann's post, where most of the "predictions" are on the public roadmaps for 2012
I wonder what the next decade will bring!
The "stupid" thing was DMann's post, where most of the "predictions" are on the public roadmaps for 2012.
____
And what does "the future of one point in history" actually mean? I can't make sense of that at all.... (Translate into American English if necessary.)
You need to read more books. Its a paradox based off a famous saying.![]()
Stupid is, as stupid does - you seem to be ignorant of the fact that 2012 is well within the time frame of next decade.
Draw yourself a timeline if it helps.Instead of being obtuse, please explain.
He's referring to a shape and you're referring to a product.
Product Steve is holding: iPod Shuffle
Shape of product Steve is holding: roundrec
Simple Harmonic Motion!
I could very well be wrong but was the iPod not the first MP3 Player to have a proper HD (5GB or something) Before that you could only have an album or so in your pocket?
I loved my walkman when I was 15 but it's no iPod.
That's the strength of Apple advertisingNo, Apple was not the first (by a long stretch). Quote: "In 1998, Compaq developed the first hard drive based DAP using a 2.5" laptop drive." More info here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_audio_player
In fact, Apple entered the MP3 market when it was fairly well established (Rio and Creative NOMAD were popular brands).