Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well at some point, lets all just hope that somewhere within the Apple legions of management someone steps back and says, "wait, just maybe we should allocate a few more resources to fixing old bugs before we introduce the next big thing."
 
Well at some point, lets all just hope that somewhere within the Apple legions of management someone steps back and says, "wait, just maybe we should allocate a few more resources to fixing old bugs before we introduce the next big thing."
Sure, but that still won't prevent various new bugs from popping up here and there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: citysnaps
And you are sure your opinion isn't biases by your personal experience?



And who says iOS 9 wasn't largely such an update? Compare how many new features (including new APIs for developers) we got with iOS 7 & 8 and then compare that to the new features (and APIs) we got with iOS 9.

All experiences are personal.

I don't want new features. I want reliability first. New features come second to that.
[doublepost=1459289829][/doublepost]
Well at some point, lets all just hope that somewhere within the Apple legions of management someone steps back and says, "wait, just maybe we should allocate a few more resources to fixing old bugs before we introduce the next big thing."

Exactly right. 100% Agree.
 
The complainers swarm on articles like these. We'll probably hear next how the iPod's click wheel sucks/sucked.

As opposed to just letting Apple continue to ignore issues, which they tend to do unless enough people complain. Without the complaining Apple would continue to believe its own PR, that its stuff does not stink. We all know people can't smell their own stink, so it is our responsibility to point it out. Unlike you, we actually want Apple to get or do better.
 
I'm curious to understand what was changed from the last beta to the final release to have caused this issue. I think Apple has relied too much on its outside beta testing program and has not done enough thorough internal alpha and beta tests. Who is finalising the design of Apple products-- Apple or random users in the public beta program? With Apple's resources, a whole department of testers using all combinations of devices against a combination of apps should be testing iOS to perfection. Only then release to public testers. Why the nonsense with so many multiple seeds? Ridiculous. iOS is a complex system software, so it requires fine grained internal testing to perfection first.
This issue has been present since 9.2 or perhaps earlier. The fact that it's now just showing up is bad timing from app updates and developers not using the deep linking system correctly, partially due to poor documentation from Apple.
 
Sure, but that still won't prevent various new bugs from popping up here and there.

Bugs happen because of lack of time or resources, or because of lack of understanding of the problem space. All of these issues are controlled by management.

Bugs don't happen because the programmers are lazy. If they do, the management should have gotten rid of said programmers. Buggy software is a management problem, not an engineering problem. The problems we are seeing right now with Apple are because management wanted it shipped without making sure the quality was sufficient. If we don't complain about it, then it will continue to happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IPPlanMan
I've been experiencing this a lot on my Mac, not my mobile stuff. Everytime I click a link to open a file it just hangs and crashes. I had to restart my computer 5 times yesterday.
 
Bugs happen because of lack of time or resources, or because of lack of understanding of the problem space. All of these issues are controlled by management.

Bugs don't happen because the programmers are lazy. If they do, the management should have gotten rid of said programmers. Buggy software is a management problem, not an engineering problem. The problems we are seeing right now with Apple are because management wanted it shipped without making sure the quality was sufficient. If we don't complain about it, then it will continue to happen.
And bugs will still happen nonetheless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Max(IT)
For as long as this has been in beta, it's really unacceptable. I'm not affected, I hardly use bookmarks because I can navigate manually faster than I can scroll through a list of links to identify the page I want… but geez.

Bookmarks has nothing to do with it. In fact, this link bug affected my phone before I even updated to 9.3 (wtf)! Of course I updated to 9.3 mistakenly thinking that would fix the problem.
 
Never had an issue with the betas, and the official release is what sucks...what gives?
An potential issue that was there for some time but just nothing triggered it to surface it. Given that it's there in versions before iOS 9.3, it's not related to the 9.3 betas or release.
 
Its a pain google search in Safari doesn't work as you can't follow links in search resuits. Strangely (?) my iPhone 6 is affected but my iPad Air2 is fine
 
As opposed to just letting Apple continue to ignore issues, which they tend to do unless enough people complain. Without the complaining Apple would continue to believe its own PR, that its stuff does not stink. We all know people can't smell their own stink, so it is our responsibility to point it out. Unlike you, we actually want Apple to get or do better.
Because Apple will read these comment sections and improve based on forum complaints? No. Suggestions/complaints sent to them are useful but complaining to complain is NOT useful. You're mixing aimless complaining with specific suggestions for fixes. I think you guys are slightly confused about the point of my post. The OP showed all of the complaints from the first 20 comments and close to none were constructive or useful.
 
As has been said here multiple times, the real issue seems to be Apple now insisting on uniform and locked-in release dates for their software updates and new software releases. Instead of shipping when it's 'ready'.
This is clearly a 'bean-counter' Tim Cook mentality at work ... hitting target dates come hell or high water.

The big mystery to me is what does Apple percieve as the advantage of making these arbitrary deadlines? If anything, these enforced release dates are causing more bugs, causing more ill-will among customers, causing more bad publicity. What part of this is good for business? Unless I'm mistaken, NO ONE would be screaming at Apple if they said iOS 9.3 would be released 'sometime next month' at the latest event (except for a few impatient geeks on a site like this).
But they release buggy software and a TON of people are bitching now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Unfortunately, selling something with "NEW FEATURES!!!" trumps reliability at this point, and it has felled Apple.

It doesn't have to be a theory. Apple could do this if it wanted to. It chooses not to. So there it is....
[doublepost=1459285266][/doublepost]

I don't know what I would have done without Night Shift until now... I love having a screen look like a nicotine stained ashtray.
Do you realize not everyone is like you ?
I really want new features on iOS and I really really like night shift.
 
Wikipedia app just got an update, specifically mentions this issue and that they worked with Apple to fix it. Interesting!
 
As has been said here multiple times, the real issue seems to be Apple now insisting on uniform and locked-in release dates for their software updates and new software releases. Instead of shipping when it's 'ready'.
This is clearly a 'bean-counter' Tim Cook mentality at work ... hitting target dates come hell or high water.

The big mystery to me is what does Apple percieve as the advantage of making these arbitrary deadlines? If anything, these enforced release dates are causing more bugs, causing more ill-will among customers, causing more bad publicity. What part of this is good for business? Unless I'm mistaken, NO ONE would be screaming at Apple if they said iOS 9.3 would be released 'sometime next month' at the latest event (except for a few impatient geeks on a site like this).
But they release buggy software and a TON of people are bitching now.
The releases just came out randomly prior to Cook, right? They just often happened to somehow magically coincide with product launches and the like. And people haven't been complaining about this or that before Cook and only just now.
 
Do you realize not everyone is like you ?
I really want new features on iOS and I really really like night shift.

Fine. But RELIABILITY is a feature. The most important one of all. Other new 'features' don't mean squat if it means your phone/computer/tablet is crashing or freezing every other time you want to use it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Because Apple will read these comment sections and improve based on forum complaints? No. Suggestions/complaints sent to them are useful but complaining to complain is NOT useful. You're mixing aimless complaining with specific suggestions for fixes. I think you guys are slightly confused about the point of my post. The OP showed all of the complaints from the first 20 comments and close to none were constructive or useful.

Not. Today, Apple is a fashion based company. Perception is king. Does Tim Cook read every single post? Nope. But someone is looking at general reactions and i'll bet someone is data mining mac rumors. It's just the way things are done in the world after twitter and redit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benjamin Frost
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.