Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Glad to hear Apple is still interested in the Mac mini. My 2012 Mac mini is still hanging in there, and I’m happy to keep it as long as it can go because I have some software on it that requires me to stick with Mojave. I’ve always been a fan of the Mac mini since my first Mac purchase in 2006 which was a Mac mini.
 
The Mac Mini Pro variant - would be nice

I love the ease of parallels and windows ARM on my mbp M1 - i can get to use software from work and so quick and easy. I can just imagine how fast next gen chips would be.
You are lucky your software works, because a lot will not.

Parallels is:

1.Using Windows for Arm(to run in a VM on an M1
2.Windows for Arm then emulates for x86 to run those apps.

There is no virtualization of regular Windows.
 
Hardly news, they are still selling the Intel Mac Mini for those that need more than 16GB Ram, clearly, they need to replace that but can't until they have something based on their own chips. It was not a case of if but when.
 
Someone needs to make a dual m.2 bay mini footprint dock with missing ports, like the old newer models for the original mini. That way you don’t need to waste money on SSD upgrades from Apple. Just move your user folder to the external SSD, keep the system on the internal, and you won’t notice a difference in speed but you will be free to upgrade more in the future.

It's not M2 based (which I agree would be great - honestly surprised OWC haven't updated the Mini stack) but there's a Chinese thing I see here on the equivalent of Amazon, which is USB-C upstream, some USB 3.x and 2.x downstream + a couple of card reader slots and an internal 2.5" SATA bay. Still haven't ordered one yet to try but it's tempting.

Fascinated by the number of people who need 3 monitors on an imac. I’ve never seen such a setup in the wild. Must be popular, though.

This thread is about Mac minis though.
 
You are lucky your software works, because a lot will not.

Parallels is:

1.Using Windows for Arm(to run in a VM on an M1
2.Windows for Arm then emulates for x86 to run those apps.

There is no virtualization of regular Windows.
I use articulate 360 for e-authoring online learning courses for my work - thank goodness that works flawlessly. I usually have to use vmware on my mac pro 5,1 with windows on there. But prefer a laptop when i'm running around.

I remember installing winzip and the whole aram windows started screen blinking and crashed. I am curious to see if there is place that shows ARM apps for windows that are compatible. Also - installed calman color monitor that worked fine.
 
So far I've been very happy with my M1 mini. But I could be tempted by a model that had 32 graphic cores. The bottleneck right now seems to be Thunderbolt; current external devices can't take advantage of the M1's speed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
The new high-end Mac mini is expected to replace the current Intel-based Mac mini that is still on sale, meaning that the whole Mac mini product lineup will have transitioned to Apple silicon. Gurman added the caveat that the new Mac mini may yet be delayed or cancelled, but said that the company will likely replace the current high-end Intel-based Mac mini with an Apple silicon version eventually.
I look forward to see how the second Mac mini releases does. This kinda gels with the rumor of a smaller Mac Pro models using Apple Silicon. We might be seeing a return to the headless Macs in the near future, where its sets up a nice marketplace of many external devices such as displays, hubs, storage, and peripherals. :cool:
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Yes! This will be my new rig, no more iMacs. Please offer 10Gb Ethernet!
10G ethernet will be an obvious add-on for all the professional level machines, like we have seen with the mini.

More valuable, I think, would be to establish 2.5G as the baseline, as the minimum in every machine they ship. This would start to establish critical mass for everything else like hubs and routers.

2.5G (at the basic chip level) is now cheap enough (a dollar or so more than a 1Gb chip) that Apple can easily afford to set this as the new minimum standard.
 
I look forward to see how the second Mac mini releases does. This kinda gels with the rumor of a smaller Mac Pro models using Apple Silicon. We might be seeing a return to the headless Macs in the near future, where its sets up a nice marketplace of many external devices such as displays, hubs, storage, and peripherals. :cool:
Mac mini’s have exist for ages, what do you mean the return of the headless mac?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stephen.R
Yes! This will be my new rig, no more iMacs. Please offer 10Gb Ethernet!
inb4 "whhhhyyyyyyyyyyyy do you want 10GbE????? you cant even get 10Gb internet LOL!!!"

i was slightly afraid of the notion that apple might consider bumping the spec on the mac mini when their 2nd iteration M chip launched for the macbook pros & such. but for the use case i just bought one for, it's perfectly fine.

i think apple has a financially opportunity to really capitalize on FOMO when it comes to the upgradability of their machines that use M chips, and i caution people to strongly consider their use cases before diving in on upgrades or feeling like they *have* to have the new upcoming model.

microcenter had the 16gb ram M1 mini on sale for $100 off, so i grabbed it, and it's magnificent.
 
I'm curious to see a Mac "Nano": just a small stick with a male HDMI port on the end. Plug it into a TV or monitor, plug in power and that's it. No other ports whatsoever. Everything else is connected wirelessly. Same could be said for the AppleTV. I don't know if I'd get one, but it would be interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.