Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
all the color started with the iPhone 5C and was a big kicker in sales that lead to Apple's upward trajectory.
Actually it started with the iMac in 1999... and was a big kicker in sales that lead to Apple's upward trajectory (actually the original Bondi Blue iMac had already started the trend by bringing design & delight back to Apple with SJ's return).
 
I guess the new power connector and loss of ethernet is simply a consequence of the reduced thickness. There is just no way to put an ethernet port or the conventional power connector into something as thin as half an inch.

I can see the point in doing it, but I really hope this connection is strong. Getting slight pulls on the cable is quite frequent, be it with one's foot or adjusting the height of the desk.
And they want everything to be wireless which is ok by me. Wifi 6 is capable of 9,6 Gbps so it's absolutely fast enough.
 
Some design decisions that should be visited on the new iMac (N.B. coming from someone that worked for Apple's original product design firm)

1. Get the white bezel harkens back to the original iMac design language... but it's just out of place and "cheapens" the look of a clean design... an alternative would have been to use a bezel with a matching color shade of the unit... making it even cleaner.

2. What's up with the chin? They had a few alt choices here that would have been better. One would be to make the back thicker and put the logic board and fan behind the display (it's sitting on a desk... thin is not the first core issue... what you're looking at and typing on are)... of course that leaves a whole lot of empty volume above it... which could have been used for increasing audio quality... in the end maybe not the best solution... the other would be to put the compute unit in the base bottom... this would make cables, connections, etc much cleaner... yes getting the data/power from the base to the display would have been a challenge, but come on it's been solved by other and "they're Apple". Issue here is you lose the VESA capability.

On the chin I think they went the wrong way, however, it's not a slam dunk fail as one can see.

Actually I'd like to see the iMac display, sans iMac (and chin) as a 4(.5)k display (and maybe 27"... and space gray)... that'd be sweet with a M1 Mac Mini...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Cranky Old Man = ON

In my day, when Apple launched a new product, you had full colour brochures with multiple pictures - of the actual item, taken with a camera - to show the item off.

Later, they had a website, complete with a gallery of photos to flick through to see those same type photos.

Now?

We get a monstrous page of scroll-induced vomit, non-real images and propaganda.

Ok - the propaganda existed in my day, too.

Cranky Old Man = OFF

All I wanted was to see some "real world" photos of the new iMac, but presumably as today's event was virtual only, there's not even a bunch of journalists with hands-on pics...

Cheers

cosmic
 
I have no idea what they were thinking when designing the front of this thing. Imagine how ridiculous that would look in an office setting.
Looks horrible. I need a replacement for my 27” guess I will have to wait longer. This thing looks corney and the screen is too small.
 
Apple's weird iMac white bezels aren't without precedent:

1618996431718.png


Can't say I'm a fan though.
 
Cranky Old Man = ON

In my day, when Apple launched a new product, you had full colour brochures with multiple pictures - of the actual item, taken with a camera - to show the item off.

Later, they had a website, complete with a gallery of photos to flick through to see those same type photos.

Now?

We get a monstrous page of scroll-induced vomit, non-real images and propaganda.

Ok - the propaganda existed in my day, too.

Cranky Old Man = OFF

All I wanted was to see some "real world" photos of the new iMac, but presumably as today's event was virtual only, there's not even a bunch of journalists with hands-on pics...

Cheers

cosmic
You'd be surprised how many product shots are CGI and not real product photography these days. All those lovely IKEA catalogue photos... completely CGI. It's far cheaper to create a CGI product and then you can put it in any CGI environment without having to contruct expensive real world sets. A large number of cars in car comercials aren't real either.
 
You'd be surprised how many product shots are CGI and not real product photography these days. All those lovely IKEA catalogue photos... completely CGI. It's far cheaper to create a CGI product and then you can put it in any CGI environment without having to contruct expensive real world sets. A large number of cars in car comercials aren't real either.
IIRC with Apple the opposite is usually true: a lot of their promotional pictures look like CGI but are actually real photos.
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Apple are so far ahead of the game - you can choose to have 1 or 2 logos on the front - just use the stickers supplied in the packaging
 
I don’t understand why they didn’t make the entire front white like those old white plastic iMacs. It’s not really the white bezel that’s the problem, it’s the awkward division between the chin and the bezel.
This. Against a light background (as in the photos - if you painted your room black you may be ok) the white bezel “recedes” coloured chin is “dominant” and, being wider than the screen, makes the whole thing look unbalanced.

Also, if you’re doing graphics/photo work you simply don’t want distracting non-neutral colours so close to the screen...
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
You'd be surprised how many product shots are CGI and not real product photography these days. All those lovely IKEA catalogue photos... completely CGI. It's far cheaper to create a CGI product and then you can put it in any CGI environment without having to contruct expensive real world sets. A large number of cars in car comercials aren't real either.
Yeah - I know - I worked for a company that did the same for 99% of the content it sold.

You can't trust anything unless its in front of your eyes.
 
There’s no room internally in the new iMac for the industry standard socket you lust for.
...as if someone held a gun to the heads of the designers and forced them to make a desktop computer that was too thin to accommodate industry standard sockets.

If you are going down that route why not power the whole thing (which is, surely, under 100W) from a Thunderbolt/USB-C port? MagSafe was great on laptops which were continually plugged and unplugged, often with the cable trailing across the floor, but that’s just not an issue with a desktop.

It could ship with a basic USB-C power supply (for the customers who basically don’t use ports) and there are already docks on the market that could provide power and various permutations of Ethernet, USB-A, C and (with M1/USB4) even extra TB3 ports. A colour matched dock that sat neatly under the stand would be a cherry on the top...

Yeah, personally I have little time for USB-C and would prefer a full complement of the dedicated ports I actually need built in to a desktop (including mains power)... but introducing a new, totally proprietary port dedicated to Ethernet and power seems to be the worst of both worlds that goes against the whole “one universal port” idea...

Of course, what it does do is let Apple create an artificial price distinction between the base model and the premium version...
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
Then you'll be forced to bring that special cable along which ruins one of the benefits of charging via existing lightning cable: you don't have to bring anything extra with you while you travel because you already have the iPhone charging cable.
The contrived logical contortions continue...

What ”special cable”? It would just be a slightly longer lightning cable with proper strain relief that is the sort of thing that they should be shipping with the iPhone anyway (plenty of people complain about frayed iPhone cables). Perfectly good for charging your iPhone (although I assume you’re happy getting up in the middle of the night to switch your single charging cable from your mouse to your iPhone...)
 
  • Like
Reactions: peanuts_of_pathos
All iMacs except the Intel model have had white bezels. So there's actually a *lot* of precedent.
It’s not just the white bezel - it’s the white bezel plus the big slab coloured chin underneath.

All of the photos you show had a completely neutral-coloured black/white/grey front face, apart from the Bondai iMac, and that only had a couple of blue highlights, not a big, honking side-to-side slab of dominant colour.
 
Cute, now go back and read what I actually wrote, including key phrases like “front face” and “apart from the Bondai iMac”.
I was answering to the part were you said that it only had a couple of blue highlights. Even on the front, the strongly colored speaker grilles alone were arguably more distracting than the subtly toned aluminum in the new iMac's chin.

Anyway in my original post I was talking about precedents of iMacs with white bezels, which they are. No, there are not a lot of precedents of white bezels PLUS a colored front, specially if you purposely exclude the iMac G3, the other iMac with white bezels and a colored front.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.