Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I love Apple's ability to do marketing bs. I really do. They could sell crap and people would buy it thinking it's the most special, amazing chocolate ever made.

Android Imprint has the same requirement, the fingerprint recognition works in a trusted execution module. It's just not called a "secure enclave".

From the requirements: "have a hardware-backed keystore implementation, and perform the fingerprint matching in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) or on a chip with a secure channel to the TEE"
Ok so Samsung copied that part as well. Thanks for the clarification.
 
In Asia we have the habit to wear face masks. For various reason. Now I did it last time too, because of a cold.
My Windows 10 could not log me in with its face detectetion because, of course, the face was severe looks different. Now that's find for me laptop. But the phone I need to unlock more often in the subway and during the day. Then every time I need to lift the mask ?

Or can I register two faces: with and without mask. And will the masked face still have enough characteristics to be unique enough ?

Practical issues, which might make the Touch ID superior ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 840quadra
This is classic Apple establishing a reality distortion field.
They failed miserably at embedding Touch-ID into the display.. now they claim they went all-in to Face-ID and Touch-ID was plan B.
Touch ID > Face ID. Will never buy a Face-ID device. EVER.
 
  • Like
Reactions: coldsweat
Apple did here something incredible from a technical point of view and something genius from marketing side. All the leaks made competition try to beat Apple in under-screen Touch ID and Apple skips it delivering something completely different. Rest will still waste time and money for old biometric method while Apple is two steps ahead.
 
  • Like
Reactions: i.mac
I love Apple's ability to do marketing bs. I really do. They could sell crap and people would buy it thinking it's the most special, amazing chocolate ever made.

Android Imprint has the same requirement, the fingerprint recognition works in a trusted execution module. It's just not called a "secure enclave".

From the requirements: "have a hardware-backed keystore implementation, and perform the fingerprint matching in a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) or on a chip with a secure channel to the TEE"

Guess you forgot about security researchers being able to get fingerprint data off a Galaxy S5 and intercept it BEFORE it got to the secure element. Or how they could add their own fingerprints to a device. Not much of a “secure channel” if data can be intercepted along the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 840quadra
I Want My Touch ID and I will keep my touch ID.
That's what the caveman said when everyone was moving to metal axes. I want my stone axe and I will keep my stone axe. Some people seem to like to live in the dark even when offered a light.
 
Guess you forgot about security researchers being able to get fingerprint data off a Galaxy S5 and intercept it BEFORE it got to the secure element. Or how they could add their own fingerprints to a device. Not much of a “secure channel” if data can be intercepted along the way.

Still an issue on the S8? Not all iPhones have flawed antennas ....just cause the iPhone 4 did... as an example
[doublepost=1507422106][/doublepost]
That's what the caveman said when everyone was moving to metal axes. I want my stone axe and I will keep my stone axe. Some people seem to like to live in the dark even when offered a light.

You know how that analogy makes no sense in relation to a hand held device ...... aka... you use an axe the same way....
 
  • Like
Reactions: ilovemykid3302012
I'm using "Hey Siri" as my basis. Unless I get my inflection just right, it doesn't work.

Have you had the same experience w/ TouchID??
No?? Me either.
Guess it’s pretty ridiculous to compare two technologies not even remotely related, yeah?
 
Wow. That is scary.

Why allow anyone self-determination about their lives when they may choose an inferior option. The state should enforce the "right" choice on everyone. Why should people be allowed to choose their own careers paths are study areas, there's a right answer of what's in demand that suits their skills. Their wrong preference shouldn't matter, right? Unhealthy food should be outlawed. Non-pro sports should be outlawed (there's a non-zero chance you may get injured for a frivolous reason). Personal cars should be outlawed; a lot of drivers are dangerous, it causes traffic and environmental damage that is bad for everyone. Pretty much every choice has a "right" and "wrong" answer according to the liberal crazies, and you want to enforce it on someone.
Straw man argument.

We are talking within the context of the design of a phone, and Apple is not a democracy. They will put out what they think is the best user experience for their customers, and you as the end user get to vote with your wallet. Like it? Buy it. Don’t like it? Then get something else.

Your choice of phone is not a political or philosophical statement.
 
Well, like it or not, you can’t deny Apple’s propensity for pushing the market in a specific direction, for better and for worse.

This is the power of Apple. To crush the world and dye it in its own image.
 
In Asia we have the habit to wear face masks. For various reason. Now I did it last time too, because of a cold.
My Windows 10 could not log me in with its face detectetion because, of course, the face was severe looks different. Now that's find for me laptop. But the phone I need to unlock more often in the subway and during the day. Then every time I need to lift the mask ?

Or can I register two faces: with and without mask. And will the masked face still have enough characteristics to be unique enough ?

Practical issues, which might make the Touch ID superior ...

More importantly, when can we start folding with those impressive processors!!?? ;)

I would have to hope they can register with masks, headdresses and other face coverings that are needed for medical, cultural, or for safety.

Presumably if it can still map facial features with part of your face covered, I would hope you could register in that way!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChristianVirtual
Well, like it or not, you can’t deny Apple’s propensity for pushing the market in a specific direction, for better and for worse.

This is the power of Apple. To crush the world and dye it in its own image.

Or, maybe
“Apple removed (insert your favorite missing part, like CD drive, ...) and still sold it,
so we can remove it too, save a few bucks. This way everything is blamed on bad Apple for stupid trend setting and we are in clear. Win win”
[doublepost=1507425469][/doublepost]
More importantly, when can we start folding with those impressive processors!!?? ;)

I would have to hope they can register with masks, headdresses and other face coverings that are needed for medical, cultural, or for safety.

Presumably if it can still map facial features with part of your face covered, I would hope you could register in that way!

Even if it would just manage an impressively detailed retina scan, you could cover your face with almost anything
and it still should recognize you.
 
Or, maybe
“Apple removed (insert your favorite missing part, like CD drive, ...) and still sold it,
so we can remove it too, save a few bucks. This way everything is blamed on bad Apple for stupid trend setting and we are in clear. Win win”

And the industry adapted. We got Steam, music streaming and cloud storage.

This is what I mean. People being incapable of looking beyond the change (removal of cd drive in this case) and understanding how the industry changes in response to effect a net positive for all of us (shift to cloud computing).

Given how the drive is thicker than certain laptops, how many people will even want it back given the choice?
 
In Asia we have the habit to wear face masks. For various reason. Now I did it last time too, because of a cold.
My Windows 10 could not log me in with its face detectetion because, of course, the face was severe looks different. Now that's find for me laptop. But the phone I need to unlock more often in the subway and during the day. Then every time I need to lift the mask ?

Or can I register two faces: with and without mask. And will the masked face still have enough characteristics to be unique enough ?

Practical issues, which might make the Touch ID superior ...


僕もこれ知りたい。仕事中ずっとマスクを使ってるから
 
I don't think k any of this news has any true value to it. Kuo is doing this to improve the sale of iPhone X.
 
I don’t remember Face ID being on people’s radar for “features we want in the next iPhone” Honestly, Apple hyped it up big time which means the fanboys will have to defend it, big time....

I don’t even remember Apple adding features because it’s what consumers want. They have always been doing things their own way thinking that it’s better for their consumers.
 
In Asia we have the habit to wear face masks. For various reason. Now I did it last time too, because of a cold.
My Windows 10 could not log me in with its face detectetion because, of course, the face was severe looks different. Now that's find for me laptop. But the phone I need to unlock more often in the subway and during the day. Then every time I need to lift the mask ?

Or can I register two faces: with and without mask. And will the masked face still have enough characteristics to be unique enough ?

Practical issues, which might make the Touch ID superior ...

Of course we won't actually know until you try it, but they have said it can handle scarfs wrapped arround a face. If it can do a scarf it isn't a stretch to think it can do mask too. That said, the picture they use has a guy wearing a scarf the way (I assume) they do in California.

faceidhatscarf-800x549.jpg

In New England we cover our nose with scarves because
67c60e00e8b610c20b37d2f280dec7bc--gag-air.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ntombi
Still an issue on the S8? Not all iPhones have flawed antennas ....just cause the iPhone 4 did... as an example

Obviously later Android devices/processors (where the secure element resides) are more secure. However, Apple was far ahead in this as well starting with the A7.

Then we have the keys being exposed in TrustZone on Qualcomm processors. Of course they patched it, but like the vast majority of Android related exploits, most users won’t see the fix.

Herein lies the difference between security handled by multiple parties (Google for Android, Qualcomm for the processors with their secure element and OEMs who add their own touches) vs Apple who is in complete control of the silicon and software.
 
Then why have they been launching TouchID on Macs when clearly there no issue with real estate for the cameras, i.e. no notch, consistent viewing angles, or the need to make 100's of millions to ensure FaceID works?

Because the iPhone needed this differentiator more than the Macs?
 
Then why have they been launching TouchID on Macs when clearly there no issue with real estate for the cameras, i.e. no notch, consistent viewing angles, or the need to make 100's of millions to ensure FaceID works?

Because Apple doesn't update Mac's anymore?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.