No dongles -- CHECKMagSafe -- CHECK
Glowing Apple -- CHECK
SD Card slot -- CHECK
Optical Audio Out -- CHECK
Reliable Keyboard -- CHECK
No Emoji Bar -- CHECK
No soldered storage -- CHECK
USB A -- CHECK
SD Card Reader Built In -- Check
No dongles -- CHECKMagSafe -- CHECK
Glowing Apple -- CHECK
SD Card slot -- CHECK
Optical Audio Out -- CHECK
Reliable Keyboard -- CHECK
No Emoji Bar -- CHECK
No soldered storage -- CHECK
My 2012 13" MBP without the retina display is also not on the list, I think because it was still available the year(s) after it's creation.
That a 2012 mac outperforms a 2017 mac regardless of class/type, yet the one that outperforms is "Vintage" just because of year difference, not sure what's hard to understand here.
At the current rate, how long before the entire range is 'vintage'?![]()
So, in other words, a machine with half the cores and roughly 40% slower clock speed is only less than 10% slower than the machine that is meant to be a powerhouse compareed to an ultralight? Sounds like progress to me.But what irks me more about these "Vintage" announcements are statements like the one above "has nearly reached the end of its life" End of life? Really? This 2012 mac outperforms some 2014 and 2015 macs, there is PLENTY of life left. Sure hardware repairs at Apple store are gone, so what? If a 2012 MBP dies, it's cheaper getting another one off eBay than paying Apple's exorbitant service fees.
And the truth is users are constantly "on their own" when it comes to hardware repairs. Any time Applecare expires, a person is on their own. Many times a $550 quote from Apple store means a user is better off buying a new Mac than giving that money to Apple.
![]()
So, in other words, a machine with half the cores and roughly 40% slower clock speed is only less than 10% slower than the machine that is meant to be a powerhouse compareed to an ultralight? Sounds like progress to me.
And again, here you are comparing 4 cores to 2 cores and you are suprised when the 4 core machine outperforms the 2 core (by in the grand scheme of things a pretty slim margin)?Yes you are right, the previous benchmark screenshots I posted were single-core benchmarks. These are multi-core, 2012 outperforms 2017:
https://browser.geekbench.com/macs/277
![]()
I completely agree there for sure, and so does apple, which is why new versions of macOS (at minimum mojave) support this and other vintage machines. The one and only thing vintage is relavant to is hardware repair. Absolutely nothing else.I'm not debating the merits of newer Macs, that's an entirely different discussion, my only point is that a 2012 rMBP is not "near end of life" as Macrumors states, in fact they are far from it as seen in the benchmarks.
Haha, no, a 2012 Mac does not outperform a 2017 Mac regardless of class/type. That is such an ignorant statement.That a 2012 mac outperforms a 2017 mac regardless of class/type, yet the one that outperforms is "Vintage" just because of year difference, not sure what's hard to understand here.
The 2012 Retina MacBook Pro will still run macOS Mojave when it releases later this year so it should be good for a while longer.
[doublepost=1530759324][/doublepost]
Haha, no, a 2012 Mac does not outperform a 2017 Mac regardless of class/type. That is such an ignorant statement.
Nobody needs onboard RJ45, you’re living in the past.
MagSafe -- CHECK
Glowing Apple -- CHECK
SD Card slot -- CHECK
Optical Audio Out -- CHECK
Reliable Keyboard -- CHECK
No Emoji Bar -- CHECK
No soldered storage -- CHECK
MagSafe -- CHECK
Glowing Apple -- CHECK
SD Card slot -- CHECK
Optical Audio Out -- CHECK
Reliable Keyboard -- CHECK
No Emoji Bar -- CHECK
No soldered storage -- CHECK
Just got a top-case replacement in warranty on my early-2013 rMBP because of a battery failure with ~512cycles.So does this mean 2013 rmbp owners should get a battery replacement this year?