8 Page in and no one has even pointed out the what I thought was obvious.
How is a low cost devices with 2019 hardware sitting in the line up priced below the iPhone 8 with 2017 hardware?
Hopefully at least this mean Apple understand there is an important market in $399 to $499.
I think this "low cost" ( By Apple Standard ) iPhone will be a new design, with On Screen Touch ID ( After Patent settlement from Qualcomm ), and skimming cost on Camera and 4G Modem Speed ( Apple's own Modem on trial ). It could be a 4.7" iPhone in a iPhone SE Size. As a 4.7", 19.5:9 Ratio Display would have the same width as 16:9 4" Display.
View attachment 856056
So depending on how you view it, it is a $499 entry level iPhone, or a much more expensive iPhone SE size with new design.
And just in case you are wondering, this leaves Apple the option to introduce a bigger SE in 2021. ( They could then discontinue the iPhone 8 ) And incidentally a 5.5" 19.5" Ratio Display also have the same width as a 4.7" 16:9 Display.
View attachment 856057
Edit: One of the good thing about this rumours is if it were true, the chances of Apple Dropping iPhone 7 this year is high and having iPhone 8 Starting in $499, and 8 Plus $599.
And in case the question arise of why Apple don't put FaceID in these model
1. FaceID is expensive.
2. FaceID component isn't going to shrink in half, there is no way to fit FaceID in those Width.
[doublepost=1567619825][/doublepost]
I wish that is true, but it is not. It is certainly not peanuts by any standards, Fabbing in Leading edge node is expensive. But the Camera cost is definitely increasing faster than any other component.
Speaking of plastic phones: the iPhone 5c - "unapologetically plastic," in the words of Jony Ive - is a stunning piece of design, and still a perfectly functional item. It's the only iPhone with a completely flush camera - nothing protruding, nothing recessed. Watch Ive's beautiful video at the 5c introduction.
It depends on the type of app of course, but regardless I'm not surprised. They're becoming rare in the wild now, even though the SE even runs iOS 13.Looking at stats for the iOS version of the app at work (USA only, 32k devices) less than 1% of our users on on 5/SE sized phones. I think they folks who have them love them but my numbers show very little usage.
Apple isn’t going to spend loads on R and D to design an entirely new device for a small segment of people. Not something Apple would ever do.Never said that. I am fine with a basic one lens camera, standard SE screen, no Face-ID. Just a larger screen in a smaller body with a newer chip and I’m good.
The one issue with your point is that even a 5.5 16:9 screen is longer - too large to use single-handedly, and that's a large part of the appeal of the SE.
I don't think SE was ever about Single Hand usage, it is more of an Entry or Cost saving model, or Affordable as Apple would likes to call it. And by releasing in March, Apple would have two cycles in a year, September cycles for Flagship and Mainstream. Affordable 6 months later.
But then I think most of this is my wishful thinking.
Except... it wasn’t „being left behind“ when Apple could have done so. To the contrary, their other 4" iOS device just got refreshed three months ago, (iPod touch on 28 may 2019)I have small hands, but I too believe it's unlikely there will be another 4" iPhone. The writing is on the wall. It's not popular and developers are moving away from that target. It's yesterday's technology and is being left behind.
Think of the 4" screen as equivalent to 1024x768 monitors for desktops. Nobody wants those anymore, even though they were extremely popular at one time.
So why did Apple refresh their other 4“ iOS device (the iPod touch) just three months ago, on 28 may 2019?
Cause it‘s left behind and nobody’s developing for it anymore?
Phone reviews are greatly skewed towards big male hands playing games. That's what iPads for. I need a small-size phone to keep contacts, chat, nfc pay, weather, music, maps, photos. Operated with one hand most of the time. Nothing calls for tablet in my pants.
That would be physically about the size of the SE, with approximately a 4.7” screen. I think it would have to have somewhat of a top bezel, though. I think what you’re talking about would satisfy many of those who want an SE2, there are a few diehards though lol.iPhone X style with no Face ID, but under screen fingerprint reader.
The 2020 5.4” is exactly that, the physical size should actually be a few mm smaller, though a little thicker than the 8.I would actually love this. The iPhone 8 was the perfect size for me and my iPhone XS is a "little" too big.
Apple is in complete touch. There simply aren’t enough of you.I don't want low-cost. I want small size. Seriously Apple, are you that out of touch?
I think you’ll get almost all that. Probably not the higher dpi though unless the cost increase from a 326—>401 dpi panel is close to zero. It’s all about BOM cost with this model.What I would want: No notch/Face ID, smaller, better screen resolution, and cheaper than XR.
Probably not, but it sure would be nice.
Otherwise, I'll wait for an Android that fits my needs.
That might make it appealing enough to really hurt sales of the flagship iPhones.That’s an iPhone 6/7/8. Not an SE.
How difficult is it to simply make an SE with an edge-to-edge screen?
Apple’s entire phone lineup needs to be updated and all bezel-free.
Admittedly, I have never tried the SE. But I did have an iPhone 6. And it was a great phone for me to use most of the time. I only have the 8+ because I wanted a bigger screen to type on.
But for 99% of the times i used it, the iPhone 6 was the near perfect size. Could easily use it one handed if need be. And very pocketable. At the same time though, I don't think I would want to go any smaller than that.
But again, that's from someone who has never used an iPhone SE sized phone.
I hope Apple does make this rumored phone. I think there is enough of a market out there to make it worthwhile.
10% isn’t enough, especially since those 10% are less likely to subscribe to services, because video and games just aren’t as compelling on a 4.0” screen.When MKBHD says "give me a bigger phone", my reply is "Yeah, you know, it's just like your opinion man". If 10% of all iPhones are SE and smaller, then 10% more will be happy to switch to a refreshed small phone.
I'm holding SE, and it's a magical size for a handheld device. If Apple does not iterate on the small phone, I will refresh its battery, Apple will get zeros.
Wait.. Isn't a SE an iPhone 5 upgraded?! What's the difference!Wait..this is SE 2? or iphone 8 upgraded?
4.7" into an smaller bezel SE or just an 7/8 iphone?