I don't care about networks, iPhone SE is 350$, Galaxy j3 is 110$, thats 3x price difference. Apple never had a 100 dollar phone.
$99.99 iPhone SE
https://www.cricketwireless.com/cell-phones/smartphones/apple-iphone-se-32gb-space-gray.html
I don't care about networks, iPhone SE is 350$, Galaxy j3 is 110$, thats 3x price difference. Apple never had a 100 dollar phone.
What are you talking about? I pointed out facts to iPhone X having great hardware.
https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-x-top-performer-stills/
iPhone X has the best camera for still, according to dxo.
Everything I said about their silicon being industry leading, having the best still camera, and the highest rated screen is all true. I know you’re mad that it is, but true nonetheless. I literally didn’t read anything you posted because I know what I’m talking about.
You pointed out 2 FALSEHOODS of iPhone X hardware.
Best Camera/Best Still Camera - denounced by the worlds most respected camera/
You say all this nonsense like it's fact. The iPhone X has good hardware.
- The best mobile silicone in the industry (fact).
- The cameras are phenomenal (best still camera on the market).
- The OLED screen was rated the best screen in the industry.
Best Camera/Best Still Camera - denounced by the worlds most respected camera/video quality testing source
The best mobile silicone in the industry (fact).
The best mobile silicone in the industry
The silicone is relative. How do you rate "best" silicone by how fast it is, how many cores, computational power as a whole, or what? NONE of that matters unless the OS that runs on it is as optimized to do all sorts of tasks. Apple themselves is VERY careful NOT to state their silicone is 'The Best' in the industry, vs "amongst" or "one of" or "the envy" etc because over such a short time this changes! That's competition at it's very best.
PS: You'll recall Apple learned this lesson of printing it's the BEST CPU back when the first Powermac G5 launched and within 6mths had a huge uproar in the industry.
https://www.dxomark.com/google-pixel-2-reviewed-sets-new-record-smartphone-camera-quality/
Seems there is a conflict here. The thing to take away from this is that the Pixel 2 is more than comperable with 1 camera than what the iPhone X is doing with 2 camera's.
btw, the throttling you mentioned about SGS8/8+ I've only seen threads about thermal throttling for users using intense apps while charging - which seems to be normal of any manufaturer. Personally I only browse in Safari when my IP7 is charging that's it. I'm still looking yet having come across more indepth or definitive that Samsung is throttling or even Google doing so.
This doesn't make sense.
If you grouping all the iPhone family, why don't you group all the Samsung Galaxy family too?
From my PoV, putting an iPhone X side by side with an S8 or a Xiaomi Mi Mix 2 makes it look like a rushed school project device, especially considering the inconveniences and the loss of functionality the notch brought (besides the ugliness which, I'll give you, is subjective).
They did. The S8 and Note 8 added up to only 33 million.
Dude, you're really struggling. So DXOMARK didn't rate iPhone X the top still smartphone camera?You pointed out 2 FALSEHOODS of iPhone X hardware.
You win the Internets.My prediction for best selling tech product of 2018 is the $29 iPhone battery.![]()
Wait until you see their Christmas quarter sales.I’m wondering how long the momentum can go though. It seems like Apple is unstoppable.
Wait until you see their Christmas quarter sales.
So $50 phones with Galaxy in their name should be included?
Please. That’s a contract price. Samsung sells new phones as low as $50 WITHOUT a contract. As in that’s the full retail price.
Apple has redeemed itself in the best tradition of American companies. Kudos on selling more product than anyone on the planet.
Dude, you're really struggling. So DXOMARK didn't rate iPhone X the top still smartphone camera?
https://www.dxomark.com/apple-iphone-x-top-performer-stills/
Let me help you. The iPhone scored a 101 for stills and the Pixel scored a 99.
Anyone who knows anything about mobile processing knows the Apple A series chips lead the industry by a wide margin.
I was right about everything I said. Why do you think I said STILL camera? I know the Pixel scored 1 point higher in their overall score. Look at the date of your link versus mine.
Unbelievable. It’s unbelievable it sold so well. First, you have the iPhone X with its ugly notch and lack of home button. Then you have the iPhone 8 with the same design as the iPhone 7, which has the same design as the iPhone 6s, which has the same design as the iPhone 6.
Both product names—iPhone X and iPhone 8—are blatant lies to customers. There was no iPhone 9 and the iPhone 8 is really an iPhone 7s.
(The iPhone 7 name was a lie as it was really an iPhone 6ss. Therefore, the iPhone 8 is really an iPhone 6sss.)
It’s amazing that Apple can be so lazy with their industrial design and hardware engineering and still be not only named the best-selling tech product of 2017, but “easily” named the best selling tech product of 2017. It’s a shame that there are no consequences for Apple’s lazy actions.
Welcome to the 21st century, unlike the "why did they remove the headphone jack?" crowd, not everyone is an audiophile people!
Yes, the AirPods would be the winner for 2017 best tech gadget for me. I don't ever see myself going back to wired headphones or using anything else, unless something better than AirPods are introduced. The seamless connection without going into settings and tapping on it just works for me.
Flawless victory!
Disagree. If ever there was an example of an iterative design approach to a car, and I mean ever, it’s the Porsche 911. It’s what it’s known for. Sloping back, rear-mounted flat 6, eyes in the fenders around a lower, flattish hood ... all those photos basically look the same. The design cues of a 1963 911 are the same as a 2017 911. Ferdinand Porsche found a successful design and, for better or worse, has stayed with it. Just like Apple.eh, every gen was different tbh.
porsche_911targa_evolution_1600_2.jpg
6, 7 are basically the same design, 7 removing the antenna strips. 8 is arguably more different because glass-back and no antenna strips, and it feels different in hand too. X was first truly new design since 2014 (3 years)
So you can’t even admit I was right and you were wrong?The score yes totalled 101 (X) vs 99 (Pixel2); yet it's WHERE the numbers show the only 3 areas of strength vs 6 other areas ... and each has to do with using 2 sensors vs one. Personally I'd say that isn't "The Best"
Source from both our links btw.
[iPhone X vs Pixel]
Exposure & Contrast:
90 vs 95
Color:
79 vs 86
Autofocus:
78 vs 98
Texture:
65 vs 73
Noise:
69 vs 59
Artifacts:
82 vs 64
Flash:
85 vs 88
Zoom:
58 vs 32
Bokeh:
55 vs 45
many of the failings could be refined by algorhythms and some of the strengths in any also could be negatively affected. This is why I go by overall ratings, not just one, or sorry 3 ratings. This is not reaching ... Zoom (and how it affets noise and artifacts) would be 'reaching'. But I'm no shutterbug.
You say all this nonsense like it's fact. The iPhone X has good hardware.
You may not like the design, but a lot of people do. FaceID has some interesting and cool tech that works.
- The best mobile silicone in the industry (fact).
- The cameras are phenomenal (best still camera on the market).
- The OLED screen was rated the best screen in the industry.
Ever use an iPhone X? The home button now feels like 1996.
200M+ people aren't wrong. MANY people just like iOS more than Android.
iOS is the major differentiator for iPhone and has been the main reason people choose Apple over Android. It’s only been with the iPhone X that the hardware has caught up to rivals like Samsung.The hardware may be good but the software certainly isn’t worth 1k at all and is why I returned mine. No matter how advanced the tech is inside and outside, the software, which is the true heart of the phone, isn’t. And I’m not paying such a high asking price for a phone that lags out of the box. There’s still frame drops and micro stutters in apps and around the OS itself. Heck, Apple had to issue a statement on their site because of those well-known-by-now reports of slowing phones which even they admit isn’t just the battery but that piece of junk iOS 11.
This once Apple loyalist switched to Android (Pixel 2) because of it, and I don’t care if 200m others bought a new iPhone, that doesn’t equal quality software (see 90s Microsoft). Samsung is the highest selling Android phone and it certainly isn’t because of TouchWiz. Like Apple, it’s because of the aesthetics and the cool factor of owning one, plus they are the most popular and most of their friends have one.
People continue to buy iPhones because of the quality reputation that they once had in the past, so they continue to buy expecting the same. They put up with these nagging issues and can look past them because they are loyal to the brand and because they like the positives which, thankfully, still remain at Apple. Things like the customer service, privacy, the app variety/quality and the secure and simple OS (which isn’t even so simple anymore). It for sure ain’t the quality software, that died over 4 years ago.
iOS is the major differentiator for iPhone and has been the main reason people choose Apple over Android. It’s only been with the iPhone X that the hardware has caught up to rivals like Samsung.
Samsung sells phones over $900, so let’s stop talking about $1k like it’s on its own island. The Pixel 2XL is almost $900.
You’re just totally mistaken if you think iOS is not a huge factor for iPhone buyers. I’ve been on both sides and iOS is far superior in my experience. Even with iOS 11hiccups, it’s gotten much better and will continue to be supported by a company that actually supports its products.
I’ve tried the Pixel 2 and find Android inferior to iOS 11.2.1 on my iPhone X.You obviously haven’t tried a Pixel 2 then because honestly, based on solely the software it blows iOS away. I’m not talking about app selection and things like that, I’m talking about how smooth it operates, the fluidity of the animations which have almost zero hiccups, how there is no lag and none of this slowing down nonsense no matter how long you own one.
This used to be Apple, and it pains me to say all of this because I never thought I’d ever find myself going to the dark side. I loved Apple and defended them at every chance I could get, but that was Apple back then when the software was quality which backed up the reason why I was so defensive.
It’s mainly those positives I mentioned in my previous post as to why many people are loyal to Apple. The software has been on a steady decline since iOS 7, but because of those positives people can look past it and put up with it. Also, there’s many casual phone buyers out there who or aren’t as sensitive to or don’t care about UI lag, and if they do it isn’t too bad to distract from everything else they love about the phone. It’s important to me though because as a techie and once Apple loyalist, I notice things like that right away. I have an iPhone 5 running iOS 6 and it is shocking seeing and feeling the difference between that and the latest iPhone running the latest iOS version. Snappy, smooth, fluid transitions, a UI which was less of a mess - all of this has been lost, no more attention to detail. People just don’t remember how good it was back then because we’ve been accustomed to the iOS 7> way of things for 4 years now.
Anyway, apologies for my rambling but that’s just how I see Apple now. They’ve completely lost focus for me and don’t sweat the details that once made them special and set them apart from the rest.