Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

LOL umm...two of those articles were for Safari ON Windows. Not OS X.

And the last one doesn't even say much at all. It's probably nothing all that big. Like someone in the comments says "it [may be] just yet another javascript/XSS bug".

At least read the sites you're linking too first ;)
 
If Macs are so safe, why were there 68 security fixes in yesterdays update. Why can someone hack a Mac in less than 30 seconds?

Macs are not perfect! I have had plenty of headaches with mine over the years. So please stop acting like they are perfect.

I chose a Mac for many reasons. Non of which had anything to do with Mac fanboys, on a forum, or in an ad, taking digs at Microsoft.
 
Coming from you, this sounds like Apple is surely gonna lose all their loyal customers.

I've tried Windows 7 and found nothing special. I'm pretty sure MS employees are going around all the blogs and forums posting about how "Windows 7 is the best thing ever OMFGZ!". I tried it and didn't see anything worth shouting about. Same old Windows. And the d...umm taskbar is much worse than it used to be. They've just added more eye-candy to try to be like OS X. Unfortunately, the eye-candy isn't actually useful/helpful like it is in OS X, and it just means Windows XP/Vista users have to again learn where Microsoft moved everything to.
 
Yeah, I agree with that. I dual booted my iMac with the Windows 7 RC, and I do have to admit it looks great. It is also really fast compared to vista that I had previously dual-booted it with.

With that said, I think Snow Leopard will probably still blow Windows 7 out of the water. But I bet Windows 7 will stop a lot of people from switching to mac simply because it doesn't suck as bad as vista.

What people tend to forget or fail to mention: Windows 7 *is* Vista. Look at the internal developing numbers. Windows 7, quite ironically, is Windows 6.1, Vista being 6.0... What do you make of that? And why does it still have the registry? NTFS? Incredibly stupid menu structure and the like?
 
If Macs are so safe, why were there 68 security fixes in yesterdays update. Why can someone hack a Mac in less than 30 seconds?

Macs are not perfect! I have had plenty of headaches with mine over the years. So please stop acting like they are perfect.

I chose a Mac for many reasons. Non of which had anything to do with Mac fanboys, on a forum, or in an ad, taking digs at Microsoft.

Sooo.. you're here complaining on a forum, taking digs at Apple???
 
I've tried Windows 7 and found nothing special. I'm pretty sure MS employees are going around all the blogs and forums posting about how "Windows 7 is the best thing ever OMFGZ!". I tried it and didn't see anything worth shouting about. Same old Windows. And the d...umm taskbar is much worse than it used to be. They've just added more eye-candy to try to be like OS X. Unfortunately, the eye-candy isn't actually useful/helpful like it is in OS X, and it just means Windows XP/Vista users have to again learn where Microsoft moved everything to.

Agreed.
 
There are some great AUs on the Mac that you can't get on the PC. But Logic is a good enough reason alone for music makers to leave Windows behind.

I'd agree that for creating music the mac platform is great, but for wave editing it severely lags in comparison to windows, mainly SoundForge and Adobe Audition, both have great feature sets and a quick way of working, there's still no mac program that can match Soundforge's batch converter, or many of it's other features. Sound Track Pro is close, but it may lead to blown speakers or bleeding ears if you are working with mono files :(
 
Well, for one 90% of the people buying computers want something as cheap as possible just so they can get online to check MySpace/Facebook and to watch YouTube. Why would they get a 1000+ dollar machine if a 300 dollar one does the same thing just as fine? Went on a small rant on this subject on my site few weeks back actually, take a look: MichaelFlux.com - Mac vs PC: The cost of ownership

And most people have one pitiful creature that configures the Scheißdreck for them, so they never experience any hassle. I know what I'm talking about, I've been on the receiving end of many a Microsoft installing extravaganza during my tenure as never-say-no-idiot of the PC peoplez. Stupid virus made my PC unusable? Don't fret, call ol' Mr. Squeak, he's gonna fix it and free of charge. I've never helped a Mac person. Never had to. Just show them where the freeware is to be found and tell them to get the fruck away from MS-Office.
 
Another good (but slightly subtle) part of this advert is the;
"Hi, I'm a Mac"
"I'm a Megan"
Exchange at the end. It sets a very different image to the "...and I'm a PC" at the end of the Laptop Hunter ads, as instead of portraying the owner of the laptop as "one of us now" is points out that the computer is responding to her...

Very subtle, but it helps to humanise the mac even further...

Very good point. You'll also notice that they then shake hands. I think this further confirms your insight.
 
The computer experience all depends on the user.. not the operating systems. If the user downloads porn or pirated software of course they're asking for trouble. Same with a mac if your not caution on the internet or when downloading things.

Lets take of the apple/pc goggles.
 
Seems Apple has a hard time with the MS ads.

It's probably because the ads are quite clever IMHO:

Mac vs. PC says: PCs suck, buy a Mac

MS ad says: Mac is great just too expensive, get a PC
 
:p Right. C',mon, of course this is what we will here. We're in a mac forum. What do you think they are saying in pc forums.

You realise that we're always just thrashing out at PCs in general, but from my experience with PC forums it's always "these sad arrogant whimpy Mac People, they are so full of themselves, I hate it when I see one of them idiots with his shiny piece of shwit... and they all look alike... it's like some kind of evil SECT... I'm tellin' ya"...
 
Yeah because Macs never cra

mheyy1.jpg

I've only had that once on my Macbook, and about 4 times in a row on my PowerMac G4 after I installed Leopard. It works peachy now though. It's no big deal anyway. Not to mention I've been using Macs for about 8 years and had numerous machines

Well at least BSODs tell you information about the error.

Ha! yeah, a load of code, so unless you know what it is, you don't know what has caused it!
 
Folks, its a trade off.

I am an IT Consultant. Most businesses run PCs because thats what the software they need runs on.

For my clients who make the Mac choice, they have limited applications. For the businesses that are really only doing correspondence and bookkeeping (and media work of course) I recommend Macs as their first choice if they can afford the upfront higher purchase costs. Most of my Mac offices are "set and forget" with very very little ongoing maintenance needed, with the exceptions of hardware failures, which happen at a very low rate, about the same as the rate for PCs.

For my customers who must run some line-of-business application that requires PC, or they cannot afford the much larger up-front costs of implementing a Mac solution, they get PCs. They experience about the same rate of hardware failures as Mac customers.

On an ongoing basis (once the office system is implemented) the PC networks require much more ongoing maintenance. This is mostly the fault of malware and trojans and end users doing something other than work while at work. I make much more money in the long run off of a PC implementation simply due to malware, and I tell my prospective customers this UP FRONT. It usually raises quite a few eyebrows to admit something like this, but it drives home the point that its either money now or money down the road. Most businesses choose the PC route. They seem to like the gamble.

The Mac clients sometimes get very upset that they cannot try out alot of the software they see without putting a PC in the office. But that seems to be the price of stability. OSX is relatively more stable, but as I see it, only because the configuration in a working office of Macs is just as stable. I know when I see an office user with (pc) all those games and web content downloads that I will see them soon for a service call. Contrarily, when the office listens to me, and keeps all that crap off and simply works on their pc, not downloading crap all the time, their stability is relatively equal to the mac.

There is no room for objective, level-headed, non-partisan posts like this here, sir. :cool:
 
Yeah because Macs never cra

mheyy1.jpg

uptime.jpg


Crashes usually result from Applications and not the OS. I even survived a power outage by putting my mac to sleep for two days and it didn't drain the UPS.

Well at least BSODs tell you information about the error.

95% of the time BSoD's simply tell you that an attempt to access an address in memory occurred. BSOD's are really only useful to the developers of an application, that is, unless you really want to know why excel crashed and have a disassembler.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.