Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Any chance we'll be seeing a sizable increase in hard drive sizes for the PowerBooks? I'm starting to hit the ceiling on my 60GB drive now and don't see the 100GB option as being able to hold back the flood waters very long once I start downloading videos off iTunes en mass. I mean I've already got two 160GB external drives at or near capacity. I need more space! :eek:
 
nagromme said:
By DVD burner I meant one that could NOT burn regular CDs, only DVDs. I don't recall if such a thing came before Superdrives or not.

Whichever it was, Apple didn't offer the FIRST--the drives could be bought--but I know they were the first to build them right into the computer as standard. Prior to that they were a hyper-expensive part that nobody really had.

I don't know if this helps or not.

CUPERTINO, California—April 8, 2002—Apple® announced today that it has shipped nearly half a million SuperDrive™-equipped Macintosh® computers and more than 2 million DVD-R media discs to date. Apple first introduced its SuperDrive, the industry’s first high-volume CD- and DVD-burning drive, and its revolutionary iDVD and DVD Studio Pro™ software applications in January 2001.

Either way, your point is bang-on: they usually implement new technologies before they become mainstream. When I bought my iMac, some people were surprised at the cost until I told them it had a Superdrive. However, I agree with you on this. It's still a bit early for Blu-ray, I think.

Squire
 
EricNau said:
Sounds pretty cool. Does that get in the way of the scrolling (like if you drag 2 figures down the trackpad your page will scroll down?)

I think iScroll was originally developed when Apple introduced two finger scrolling; it gave those of us who have older PBs the ability as well.

In earlier versions, two finger right-click didn't work, but since the Tiger version I've had no problems using both functions and I'll never go back. When all my non-mac friends use my computer I see them moving the mouse to the scroll bar and searching in vain for the right-button. Then when I tell them about two finger stuff they think its awesome.

So to get back to the point, I think Apple would be crazy not to introduce "right-click with two finger" capability. I really don't want to see two buttons on the PBs, the simplicity is one thing I love about my mac.
 
EricNau said:
I still can't see Apple dropping eht 12", it leaves too large or a price gap (unless of course they drop the 15" price).
It's not too much of a gap - I believe there's too LITTLE of a price gap right now between the iBooks and the PowerBooks and too little spec difference. If they really boost the specs tomorow and drop the 12" then Apple will have a real pro machine, at a good price difference than their consumer products. It will create a definitive line which is a GOOD thing.
 
mongoos150 said:
It's not too much of a gap - I believe there's too LITTLE of a price gap right now between the iBooks and the PowerBooks and too little spec difference. If they really boost the specs tomorow and drop the 12" then Apple will have a real pro machine, at a good price difference than their consumer products. It will create a definitive line which is a GOOD thing.
But if they drop that 12" aren't we talking a $800 difference (or something).
Seems like they should be under $500. I think a $300 differnce would be perfect.
That's why we'll see Powerbook updates tomarrow, but no iBook (I think). I think I mentioned that in an earlier post.
 
ZoomZoomZoom said:
A 50'' PB would be about as tall as me. (Not sure about PB dimensions, so not sure if the horizontal length of the PB would be greater than 67'' assuming a 50'' diagonal screen...)
how could the horizontal length be 67"? if the largest length of the screen, the diagonal, is 50" then the horizontal dimensions must be less than that.
 
jholzner said:
According the most recent finances it's nearing 9 billion in Cash. How much ya think photoshop would sell for ;)
6 Billion ... 9 Billion ... whose counting? Besides Steve. ;)
 
EricNau said:
But if they drop that 12" aren't we talking a $800 difference (or something).
Seems like they should be under $500. I think a $300 differnce would be perfect.
That's why we'll see Powerbook updates tomarrow, but no iBook (I think). I think I mentioned that in an earlier post.
$300 price difference? That's insane! If Apple had such a small price difference, there would be very little reason for someone to buy a PowerBook, they would spring the extra few hundred for the PowerBook. A *pro* line carries with it a *pro* price tag - because there is a huge spec gap. If there was a mere $300-500 price difference, the specs would be far too close to one another to merit a consumer-pro difference.
 
NicP said:
how could the horizontal length be 67"? if the largest length of the screen, the diagonal, is 50" then the horizontal dimensions must be less than that.
I was gonna post the same response, but forced myself to refrain. Couldn't bring myself to confront someone's basic geometric and math skills. :D
 
inkhead said:
Apparently you've never heard of a little company called Dell? Dell makes laptops. Dell has 1440x900... this is a better dell, sporting "options" I wish Apple would give me "options"

Wide Screen or "Wide-Aspect" is a measure of the ratio of width to height of a screen. Traditional notebook LCDs are a 4:3 aspect ratio, while wide screen LCDs have a wide aspect ratio of 16:10. of the wide screen technology is being able to see more information on screen. The wide aspect 15.4" WXGA screen provides 30% more information than standard aspect ratio 15" XGA screens, and the wide aspect 15.4" WUXGA screen provides 20% more information than standard 15" UXGA screens.

15.4 inch WXGA = 1280 x 800 pixels

15.4 inch Ultra SharpTM WSXGA+ = 1680 x 1050 pixels

15.4 inch Ultra SharpTM WUXGA = 1920 x 1200 pixels

1440x900 = default resolution of 15" widescreen laptops available in the windows world for the last two years.

I did a quick google search and found this:
http://www.ciao.co.uk/Laptops_5220890_2-1440_x_900
It shows only 17 inch displays with a resolution of 1440 x 900.
 
mongoos150 said:
$300 price difference? That's insane! If Apple had such a small price difference, there would be very little reason for someone to buy a PowerBook, they would spring the extra few hundred for the PowerBook. A *pro* line carries with it a *pro* price tag - because there is a huge spec gap. If there was a mere $300-500 price difference, the specs would be far too close to one another to merit a consumer-pro difference.

Right now there is a $200 difference tho. (14" to 12" combo)
 
dontmatter said:
um, no.

On both counts.

the 12 inch powerbook is not going away, not at all. Clearly, the 15 inch gets you a better laptop-more power, runs cooler, bigger screen, etc. But the 12 inch gives portability, and that is why people who buy the 12 buy it-it's the maximum in portability with a full fledged computer. Hear of the booming ultra portable market? people want portability, and 12 inches is as far as apple is willing to go on that. It's the minimum size they can make a computer with a full size keyboard, and that is exactly why it is 12 inches.

Second, why on EARTH would apple reduce it's portables to one line? notebooks now make up more than half of apple's sales, and I believe the world's, and sales keep on growing. Powerbooks and Ibooks sell well. Some people want the high end, some low, you can't get rid of that, don't shrink the lines. Apple doesn't like big numbers, for sure-dropped the ebook, but they really don't like one. The formula is, give the customers decisions between two or three things, then 2 or three more, as deep as you need to go, so at any point, it's not overwhealming. So, laptop, or desktop? Desktop? OK, then low, mid, or high? OK, mid. What size screen and speed on your imac, then? great, can I get you an ipod to go with?

But apple, no company, would ever reduce themselves to one line in a major, major portion of the market, when both lines sell well.

not to mention, they've held them apart even as the lack of processor advances have made it impossible to have a range of power. But soon comes intel, and we can have powerbook be power and ibook be budget again, why whould they stop that?

I think a 13.3 WS will supercede the 12. And if the lines of portables don't merge, I think we'll see them becoming more and more alike (moreso than now).

I'm all for Apple having a $699-$3500 portable. According to the rumors, and the way things are looking, there'd be a big hole in things unless we see some changes.
 
Mr Maui said:
Nice Photoshop job, 'cept for one minor detail. Is it just me, or does that touch pad seem to be a bit big compared to the keyboard. Apple gets new patent for ELBOW TOUCH PAD!! :D
Just what I need for my wrist problems.
 
mongoos150 said:
$300 price difference? That's insane! If Apple had such a small price difference, there would be very little reason for someone to buy a PowerBook, they would spring the extra few hundred for the PowerBook. A *pro* line carries with it a *pro* price tag - because there is a huge spec gap. If there was a mere $300-500 price difference, the specs would be far too close to one another to merit a consumer-pro difference.

Erm.. the difference should lie in the specs, and not in what Apple decides to price it for.

Contrary to your belief, that easily dented/scratched Aluminium casing is not going to help you work a lot more productively as compared to a iBook....
 
wonder if we'll see FrontRow on mac mini? :/
I want that to happen... so I can get one and use it as a media center! =)
 
Don't know if this has been posted already, but according to Appleinsider, the invitation Apple sent out to the media "is jet black and sports a large camera lens as a teaser."

Of course, the text of the invitation reads:

"Please join us for a special press conference on the eve of PhotoPlus Expo 2005 as we unveil Apple's latest pro innovations."

So for sure, we're getting a photo-related product. Photo + Pro = Photo Pro. It's a no brainer.
 
generik said:
Erm.. the difference should lie in the specs, and not in what Apple decides to price it for.

Contrary to your belief, that easily dented/scratched Aluminium casing is not going to help you work a lot more productively as compared to a iBook....
Excuse me buddy but you're in no position to state what *my* beliefs are. If you really can mind read, then I'm wrong and I bow down to thou :rolleyes:

By the way, I know people with PowerBooks from 2002 with absolutely zero dents/scratches - I've seen iBooks, they hold up just about as good as PowerBooks do albiet they scratch HELLA easier. Consider yourself Pwned.
 
ZoomZoomZoom said:
A 50'' PB would be about as tall as me. (Not sure about PB dimensions, so not sure if the horizontal length of the PB would be greater than 67'' assuming a 50'' diagonal screen...)

Ummm....

Uh....

Sorry, I'm at a loss for words :confused:
 
dontmatter said:
I vote PB and PM updates, because think secret said so (well, sort of), but I also vote more importantly, something photographic, and not just a pro-iphoto, but something quite big and unexpected. Why? did you see the map of that photo-expo? you would think cannon, nikon, or maybe adobe would have the booth that apple has. apple wouldn't reserve the most important booth at the place unless they thought they had the most important thing there.

Also, why would they reserve the booth but try to keep quiet about it, unless it was a big tipoff to a product they were going to introduce?

Exactly what I've been wracking my head about. The pro photographers use three things - cameras, software, and displays. A couple of possibilities come to my mind:

- They're doing their first MacTel Release - either a PM or PB or something new - the big secret is that Photoshop (and very probably their own PhotoPro) has already been ported to Intel native. Also extended support for RAW mode of many pro cameras that people have been begging for might be built into PhotoPro and/or added to iPhoto
- They're releasing a totally revamped line of displays. I think its a bit suspicious that the displays haven't been updated in quite a while and there is apparently nothing to point to the fact that the displays are being updated (all shipping times are 24 hours for instance).

Its got to be something that people who work on photography and creative works will be impressed by. Although I'm sure there will be a new iSight, I find it hard to believe a webcam is going to capture anybody's attention at Photoplus. And as someone said earlier, Apple releasing a professional digital camera would be a joke.

EDIT1: Just thought of it - don't discount the possibility of a tablet/pen based input system - possibly touch screen displays?

EDIT2: I was #200!
 
Trowaman said:
Okay, so here's how it's been going for me:

ROKR/nano event: class
iMac/Video iPod event: job interview
Powerbook/Powermac/Photo Pro event: First day of work.
Let me congratulate you on your wedding (MacWorld SF) and first child (WWDC).


Squire said:
I don't know if this helps or not.
Thanks. That's the very thing. 2001.


generik said:
Contrary to your belief, that easily dented/scratched Aluminium casing ...
I have to set the record straight here :) Anodized aluminum can possibly be dented (with enough force--it's never happened to mine despite much abuse) while plastic iBooks cannot. But scratches? Al is virtually scratch-proof, while plastic scratches very easily. I have put my AlBook through a lot to know that. It still looks like it came fresh from Apple, despite me grinding it on gritty tabletops, hitting it with metal cable-ends and keys, etc. (I know that even Al can scratch, but MUCH less easily than plastic. Impacts generally leave a mark that rubs off easily--because it's the thing that HIT the Al rubbing off on it--like drawing with a crayon. That's because aluminum oxide is harder than most of the things you run into. Not so with plastic.)
 
nagromme said:
I have put my AlBook through a lot to know that. It still looks like it came fresh from Apple, despite me grinding it on gritty tabletops, hitting it with metal cable-ends and keys, etc. (I know that even Al can scratch, but MUCH less easily than plastic. Impacts generally leave a mark that rubs off easily--because it's the thing that HIT the Al rubbing off on it--like drawing with a crayon. That's because aluminum oxide is harder than most of the things you run into. Not so with plastic.)

Just watch out for other anodized aluminum, stainless steel, and most metallic objects! (Especially airplane seat belt buckles--the only scratch on my PowerBook is right across the latch button and surrounding aluminum from a fastening seat belt.)
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.