How on earth could any such company get it so very very wrong, than to make the trashcan?
It's no surprise that there's been a massive exodus of Mac Pro buyers that have switched to Hackintoshes; and what a treat since not only do the machines cost way less, they also run CIRCLES around the Mac Pros too. Glad I got my Hackintosh a few years ago; it's been amazing.
Well a number of people just seem want Quanta to build the standard workstations they do for PC OEMs and put an Apple logo on it instead of an HP or Dell logo.
Have you ever conceived, designed, tested and manufactured a product from the ground up?why so long????
Not sure pros would use hackintoshes...dubious licensing and stability issues. no thanks
Cue the complaints from people that won't be putting down the money to buy a Mac Pro regardless.
I'm upset about the Ferrari that's far outside of my price range.
Apple's redesigned, modular Mac Pro aimed at professionals is set to launch in 2019, according to an update Apple recently provided to TechCrunch's Matthew Panzarino, who took a trip to the company's Cupertino campus.
The team responsible for revamping Apple's pro product efforts was there to provide updated details both on the Mac Pro and how Apple is shaping it to meet the needs of real professional users.
Employees in the meeting included John Ternus, VP of Hardware Engineering, Tom Boger, Senior Director of Mac Hardware Marketing, Jud Coplan, Director of video Apps Product Marketing, and Xander Soren, Director of Music Apps Product Marketing.![]()
Apple's current Mac Pro
Panzarino was told in no uncertain terms that the Mac Pro will not be arriving before 2019 as the product is still in development. From Tom Boger:Apple wants customers to know that the Mac Pro isn't coming in 2018 so those who are planning to make a purchase decision for a pro machine like the iMac Pro won't hold off in the hopes of a Mac Pro materializing later in the year.
In the time since Apple announced major changes for the next-generation Mac Pro last year, it has put together a "Pro Workflow Team" led by John Ternus, where employees who focus on pro-level products all work together.
Apple has also been hiring award-winning artists and technicians in an effort to understand the real workflows that creative professionals use to better tailor its products to them. The individuals shoot real projects and then use Apple's hardware and software to find "sticking points that could cause frustration and friction" for pro users.
Apple's Pro Workflow Team finds and addresses the issues that come up, even down to tiny details like tweaking a graphics driver, and it's not just Apple's products that benefit - the company's employees are also working with third-party apps. From Tom Bogar, senior Mac marketing director:The Pro Workflow team, in addition to improving current Apple products, is also an essential part of Mac Pro development. Their work is "definitely influencing" what Apple's planning for, with Apple achieving a "much much much deeper understanding" of pro customers, their workflows, and their needs. This understanding is "really informing" the work Apple is doing on the Mac Pro," according to Bogar.
No details were provided on the shape of the Mac Pro or the internal components that it might include, but Apple is still planning on a modular machine, as announced last year, so plans have not changed. Apple back then said that it was "completely rethinking" the Mac Pro, and that it is "by definition" a modular system. Apple at the time also said a pro display was in development alongside the new machine.
Panzarino says we're not likely to hear any additional detail about the Mac Pro at WWDC in June, and that he expects Apple will keep quiet about the machine until next year.
Panzarino's full piece on Apple's efforts to tailor the Mac Pro and other pro-level products to meet professional needs, which goes into much greater detail, can be read over at TechCrunch.
Article Link: Apple's Revamped Mac Pro to Launch in 2019
Have you ever conceived, designed, tested and manufactured a product from the ground up?
Didn't think so.
Have you ever conceived, designed, tested and manufactured a product from the ground up?
Didn't think so.
Have you ever conceived, designed, tested and manufactured a product from the ground up?
Didn't think so.
Have you ever conceived, designed, tested and manufactured a product from the ground up?
Didn't think so.
That's what I came here to say.What about the Mac Mini though?
So fully 6 years between them by 2019, that's crazy to think of the gap left. That a very long time in silicon terms.
The "pro workflow team" is encouraging. I'm hoping for myself it allows a lot of min/maxing, not fixed to relatively high end hardware on all parts like the iMac Pro. I need a lot of CPU for data science, but a GPU goes entirely unused, so I wouldn't need Navi Pro with HBM2 adding to the cost.
Apple could just put a new motherboard in their leftover 2012 Mac Pro cases and ship them next week.
This is pathetic...
Companies like Dell can come out with tens of updated machines per year with different motherboards, form factors, etc, with much lower margins and cash on hand than Apple has.
Apple has much fewer products, and can't update a computer once every 5 years.
I'm tired of hearing excuses. It doesn't need Thunderbolt 4 or anything else coming out in 2019, give us a modern platform with current hardware. It doesn't take 4-5 years to design yourself out of a illogical trash can design.
If you are a electrical engineer and you can't design a motherboard in less than a year, you are in the wrong business. If you are a computer manufacturer and you can't hire the right people to get the job done in less than a year, you are in the wrong business. If you are a CEO and you can't get your act together with a product line you claim publicly is still important, you are in the wrong business and should resign.
And if you no longer care about this line of business, ADMIT IT and let your customers move on to companies who actually try harder than you do to serve their customers
So, the design process is going to take 2 or more years. This can only mean that either it’s so custom and non-serviceable (and non-Nvidia-able) as the iMac Pro, or, alternatively, that they prefer to wait until all the professionals have either purchased an iMac Pro or moved to Linux or Windows, so that they avoid releasing a modular/serviceable Mac, which would be a product against the current Apple strategy (“we decide, not you”).
Why are "pros" always so terrible whiny? x_X