Don't forget to lock the power cord into the unit.Take an iMac, remove the computer and double the price. This is some kind of evil genius at work.
Don't forget to lock the power cord into the unit.Take an iMac, remove the computer and double the price. This is some kind of evil genius at work.
Ah, well, not for me thenNot if it's 5K and still meets Apple's current Retina PPI standards.
And don't forget the non-replaceable stand.Don't forget to lock the power cord into the unit.
I think the 27" cinema display and 27" Thunderbolt display were sold at the same time for a little while. I am sure I can find more examples, the 90's were a mess for Apple products..Those lines are still much more frequently updated compared to displays. And Apple never sold two displays of the same size before.
Good catch.I think the 27" cinema display and 27" Thunderbolt display were sold at the same time for a little while. I am sure I can find more examples, the 90's were a mess for Apple products..
This is just strange. After 10+ years of not having a 27” monitor and just having a 27” iMac to then having 2 monitors and no iMac In the same year?
Except that $3,000 miniLED Studio Display would blow the XDR out of the water in everything except size. Meaning Apple won't do it unless they update the XDR first or at the same time.
I want a 32" 6K Studio Display! I'm perfectly fine without 120 Hz refresh and HDR.
This is one of the most unprofessional "tech reviews" I have ever read.Here's another perspective on this from macperformanceguide.com, which is devoted to photography on the Mac. Hopefully others aren't having the issues he is:
![]()
Apple Studio Display: the Technological Dumpster Fire that Crashes Jus
macperformanceguide.com
Yes, it does. There are sources (Gurman?) that keep saying an iMac Pro / 27" iMac is coming. I think it makes more sense that this display is for that than yet another display in their lineup.Sounds like an iMac honestly.
I agree. I think this is most likely for a 27" iMac possibly with the "Pro" moniker.This is total nonsense. Apple just released a 27" display, and I'm pretty confident production of that display has either ground to a halt or has been seriously curtailed. No way are they going to release another one in a few months.
The only way this is remotely accurate is if the display is for a 27" iMac.
So an iMac with target display mode?It would be great if this display included even a lower powered Mac inside which you could use for day to day stuff -- with the option to use it as a display for a higher end Mac Pro when needed.
Yes, I think its time to bring that back!So an iMac with target display mode?
The 27" Thunderbolt Display was discontinued in June, 2016. After that Apple sold 27" LG UltraFine displays.After 10+ years of not having a 27” monitor...
One has to assume that the glaring limitation of 40 Gbit/s will be removed in a future iteration.How so? Mini-LED backlight would not change the Thunderbolt bandwidth limitation at all, and to my knowledge, it’s not possible to allow 5K 120hz, except using DSC (which is still irrelevant to the backlighting technology)
This is one of the most unprofessional "tech reviews" I have ever read.
It’s on the Apple TV, so it’s possible… 😉120hz isnt possible due to thunderbolt limitations
I suspect they aren't selling all that many of them. It's rather strange.Take an iMac, remove the computer and double the price. This is some kind of evil genius at work.