Agreed.
And it doesn't surprise me that Google being evil led to a rift that got GMAPs booted from iOS.
Apple made the right choice.
How was Google being "evil" ?
Agreed.
And it doesn't surprise me that Google being evil led to a rift that got GMAPs booted from iOS.
Apple made the right choice.
How was Google being "evil" ?
Did you not read the article? Google has been abducting puppies from iPhone owners, which it finds when the user used the Maps app to go to any pet-related store. It's like you're not even paying attention!
Don't be evil... right...
Google will give away anything for free (including other peoples intellectual property) as long it drives their ad sales (which turn-by-turn navigation on iOS don't).
I don't mind companies making profits, but please don't think Google is somehow better than all the other companies out there.
The whole maps situation is purely idiotic, and their customers are suffering because of their stupidity.
The problem is the end user, the consumer could give a %^* less about the politics of it all. They just want a map app that doesn't suck. And right now for many users the new map app is worse than what it replaced. All the behind the scenes BS between Apple and Google means nothing to them. I think Jean Louis Gassee had it right when he said Apple should have under promised and over delivered and they did the opposite. I'm not one who believes in the "Steve would never have..." nonsense but I do think he might have introduced maps differently and not oversold it.
How was Google being "evil" ?
iOS users want great products. They don't want to be products. Might work great for cattle, but people, not so much.
Google was seeking more ways to turn iOS users into a product to be sold to the highest bidder.
iOS users want great products. They don't want to be products. Might work great for cattle, but people, not so much.
Yet your usage data, placement and what you do is what will make Apple Maps happen - IOS users should get out more...
Well that makes me feel a little bit better about the crappy map data. I'd rather have turn-by-turn.
Google was seeking more ways to turn iOS users into a product to be sold to the highest bidder.
iOS users want great products. They don't want to be products. Might work great for cattle, but people, not so much.
This is pretty much what I figured-- Apple got tired of Google dragging their feet and bumped them. Good for Apple. Now we'll suddenly get a Google Maps app with turn by turn, 3D imagery and all the other features we should have had at least a year ago.
Good. Who the hell wants Google's stupid branding all over things when the product is paid for already?
Explain how Google was dragging its feet?
Did you read the article? Google offered the latest and greatest features but Apple was unwilling to accept their terms. How does that equate to Google dragging its feet?
And that makes me angrier that major markets in which people don't care for turn-by-turn directions (such as Japan) have lost the best mapping service out there and ended up with the sh*tiest maps ever because of a "feature" they don't need.Well that makes me feel a little bit better about the crappy map data. I'd rather have turn-by-turn.
Apple doesn't like it when they can't call all the shots. They like to be the bully and not compromise. So now the loyalists are stuck with an inferior map app. But at least they can brag about Apple not caving to Google. And to many, that is what is most important.
+1
Apple had a year to go on contract with Google anyway, why realease their own at such an early stage?
During "this one year left", Apple can be doing what they need to do, "behind closed doors"... Perfecting their own maps app and other Siri-related stuff. While, Google's maps data still worked on IOS
Then when the ne year is up, tmee to update and bring Apples Maps to everyone.. Im not saying hold off on IO 6 by any means... But Apple's Map app should of been a seperate udate. Not ready for 'prime time'
Less fuss.... And Apple knew it
The data can be swapped out and fixed fairly quick. If they have the will to do so.
People are suffering? ... over two companies fighting over taking your money ... through a maps app .... on $300+ devices ... with $100+ monthy service contracts.
Especially since they bought the company.
It really should be branded "Keyhole". Google did not create a thing. They would still be reading fold out maps if they did not buy them.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyhole,_Inc