Wonder if this is a good for us grandfathered unlimited account.
that feels good to hear, but sadly that maybe just conjectureQuick chat with AT&T regarding tethering (it could be offered in the future) and AT&T next question:
View attachment 689056
No, t-mobiles is 28. No slowdown though.
OK. So I'm a little hesitant to post this, but what the heck.
First, some useless back-story... There are four of us with phones - my wife and our two kids (high school age). They've both had instances where they have turned off their Wifi at school and then later went home and streamed YouTube, used FaceTime, etc., killing our 20GB shared value plan (which is $15 for each additional 1GB overage). It happened again this month. Half way through the month, we had less than 2GB's left.
I started the process to switch to Verizon on Wednesday afternoon. Called AT&T on Thursday to make sure two of the phones were unlocked and could be switched. I also had to finish off payments for my son. When I called AT&T for that, they transferred me to the service termination department. The fellow there told me about this new unlimited plan. He said it was the same cost as Verizon - $180. We chatted about it for a bit and I asked him if it included 10GB's of tethering. His response was "not yet." I did not know that AT&T didn't allow tethering. I am disappointed with his response as it was limited to saying that they don't yet have a separate allowance, like Verizon, for tethering. He certainly didn't tell me no tethering at all. Fortunately, he gave me his email address as I told him that I might still switch to Verizon if I get hit with cancellation/restocking fees from them. He switched us to the AT&T unlimited plan.
I canceled the switch to Verizon. Then I read there is no tethering and I also read that the $180 price kicks in after the second month. For the first two months, the price is $220.
He and I traded emails late yesterday afternoon. He assured me that the price is $180, starting with the first month. He said that if it doesn't, he'll issue me a credit. I checked the MyATT app this morning and it shows $220 per month. I just sent him an email.
However, tethering is working for me. I have my iPhone's wifi turned off. I have my iPad's wifi turned off. I connected my iPad to my iPhone via bluetooth and my iPad is connected to the internet.
TL;DR: I have the new AT&T Unlimited Plan and my iPad is tethered to my iPhone and it's working fine. I better not get screwed for $80.
I have a feeling if you reboot your iPhone, Personal Hotspot will no longer be able to be turned on in Settings. Other people on the "old" unlimited plan mentioned that once they rebooted their iPhone after switching to the plan, when they tried to enable Personal Hotspot on their iPhone, it told them to contact AT&T.
I wonder if they will still
It's 17% off $60, not $100. It's written as a $40 per device charge plus $60 for the plan.
For what it's worth I just chatted with AT&T and was told just about the same thing.Quick chat with AT&T regarding tethering (it could be offered in the future) and AT&T next question:
View attachment 689056
It's not throttling but deprioritization that depends on the congestion that might be present on a particular tower and only for the duration of congestion on that particular tower. Not really something that can be defined as it likely won't even kick in many instances, and in some that it would kick in it would affect latency rather than actual speed/bandwidth and even then hard to say to what degree as it can differ on the congestion.They need to define their throttling speeds or this is pointless.
Previously "unlimited" plans, after they hit 5gb, would be throttled down to something like 0.1Mbps, where even Google Maps was unusable.
I'm not opposed to some bandwidth throttling under these two conditions:
1. There is network congestion, and,
2. The throttled speed is actually usable. To me these days, that probably means somewhere around 2-3Mbps at a bare minimum. I can survive without the fastest LTE/4g rates of 5/15/10Mbps, but their old throttled rates were basically only usable for email.
If they can't support those throttled rates under heavy load conditions, then they need to improve their infrastructure, period.
Its 15GB base for family with rollover...so Let's say first month your family uses 11GB (2.75 GB avg each) then 4 GB roll-over so the next cycle we then have 19 GB. Its always not used amount under 15GB added to next cycle..
So the next month we start with 19GB use 13 GB ..the rollover is 15-13= 2GB so the following month we have 17GB...so it varies each month usually we end up using 10-13 GB. Nice for heavy months if you have that buffer.
"Rollover Data is a benefit that we first introduced with our Mobile Share Value plans where unused data from your monthly plan allowance rolls over for one billing period."
[doublepost=1487343612][/doublepost]
Lucky..have to keep my eye out for that again.
I'm not opposed to some bandwidth throttling under these two conditions:
1. There is network congestion, and,
2. The throttled speed is actually usable. To me these days, that probably means somewhere around 2-3Mbps at a bare minimum. I can survive without the fastest LTE/4g rates of 5/15/10Mbps, but their old throttled rates were basically only usable for email.
If they can't support those throttled rates under heavy load conditions, then they need to improve their infrastructure, period.
They do manage the connections at all times, but at some point there might be too many of them congesting a tower in which case some additional buckets come into play like prioritizing users who haven't gotten over a certain limit (or don't have a limit as part of their plan) ahead of those who have.I'm not really sure what the point of throttling or deprioritization is.
NOBODY should be allowed to hammer away at a tower, right?
For instance... if you've only used 19GB for the month... you can bang away at the tower possibly depriving others of network speed.
So what exactly changes if you've used 30GB for the month?
I just don't understand the idea of "after you've used this amount of data... your further connections to the tower will be affected"
It seems like ALL connections to the tower should be managed at ALL times... not just after a certain point.
How are those gas prices?
Waaaaay smaller infrastructure. We pay for the much larger coverage area and maintenance.
Quick chat with AT&T regarding tethering (it could be offered in the future) and AT&T next question:
View attachment 689056
They do manage the connections at all times, but at some point there might be too many of them congesting a tower in which case some additional buckets come into play like prioritizing users who haven't gotten over a certain limit (or don't have a limit as part of their plan) ahead of those who have.
What I dont understand is why a tablet costs $40 just like a phone line? I guess it really is all about data these days and talk/text don't really mean anything.
easy because you can now talk/text over data.What I dont understand is why a tablet costs $40 just like a phone line? I guess it really is all about data these days and talk/text don't really mean anything.
Way smaller population as well!