To the few users that disliked this: I didn’t mean it’s not an issue for the affected professionals, just not super sure it’s front page worthy.The great tech news drought at it again.
To the few users that disliked this: I didn’t mean it’s not an issue for the affected professionals, just not super sure it’s front page worthy.The great tech news drought at it again.
I personally wouldn’t care a bit as a presenter or as a customer.Absolutely nothing. This is showing up on the second presentation screen even when the menu is hidden, though.
Certainly, and because of this I wouldn’t expect you to complain about it. But if you did care, I wouldn’t expect you NOT to complain.I personally wouldn’t care a bit as a presenter or as a customer.
So no business can operate differently here? It is, 100% guaranteed a MUST to be an issue for this orange circle? That no business would have different opinions on the matter? Yes businesses have opinions not just me. It’s similar to the watermark I mentioned before. Some of my clients need it on there. You might find it distracting, they don’t. Oh we got an opinion there don’t we? But I thought you said opinions don’t matter?
hmmmm if only things like that couldn't get bypassedIf only there was a way to authenticate the device owner… like a sequence of letters and numbers only known to them that they could enter whenever they want to deactivate security features. ??
hmmmm if only things like that couldn't get bypassed
Why not both? why do you think it's either or?My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
First world problems, really.Certainly, and because of this I wouldn’t expect you to complain about it. But if you did care, I wouldn’t expect you NOT to complain.
A few months ago I was at my local museum they had installed several projectors sideways to cast portraits up on the walls of old displays that had been there years ago when I was a kid, and I was struck by the way it changed the whole look of a 40 year old installation. I doubt in this situation they would be using mic feeds, but it was using old greyscale images and the thought of having to worry about orange dots showing up in that would make the Mac rather unusable for the purpose. At a conference or business display, it isn’t great, but for an art installation it is huge. I’m not an artist, but I can see their issue with this.
My security vs. your aesthetics. let me think....
First world problems, really.
the simple answer is your business does not out weigh my right to privacy. As so many of the posters on here seem to be suggesting Also just because you or the original person from the article didn't bother to test when the betas of an OS came out, on a system that you could test on is not any ones fault but your own. If your business relies on software being usable then you should be testing that your stuff is compatible. It is just a fact of IT life for any business.So, it's better to use a different OS that doesn't force junk on external displays? Or all OS's should adhere to filling every display in the world with privacy junk?
Can you articulate to me what problem you think this orange dot is solving on an external display?
I highly doubt that you would consider "privacy junk" if it involved you or your family. what if your child was using an external monitor and that was getting recorded...I would think you might want to know that. But maybe you don't, I don't know.
So your solution is then that apple should not sell computers to home users. Because that might interfere with a use that a business hasThis argument assumes a computers sole purpose is a personal computing device. We're talking about a scenario where it's being used as a broadcast device, in a public environment, when an operator has very intentionally provided an audio feed to their device. This is a market that Apple have closely aligned themselves with in the creative space.
My proposal for a fix would be:
1. Orange light always displays on taskbar for internal microphone.
2. User can select whether orange indicator is visible outside of taskbar.
3. User can select whether orange indicator is displayed for external sound input hardware.
Or a whitelist type feature might work. The same as allowing chrome to screen capture, for example.
Where did I say that?So your solution is then that apple should not sell computers to home users. Because that might interfere with a use that a business has
Like I said, I dont need to spy on anyone, its support for our users. Sometimes all I'm doing is making sure users are following instructions after a roll out (which most dont and end up causing a big screw up). What I dont need is a big banner coming up saying 'I'm watching you!!'.If it comes up when I am not expecting it, I report that user that is misusing their title and abilities to spy on the employees.
and as I keep saying you can't have an opt out that will not get exploited.Where did I say that?
My suggestion is to provide privacy centric defaults and provide the user with ways to opt out of particular behaviour, if they choose to.
Every business is different. Our IT gets inventory of our software and OS versions so they DONT need to watch our screens. And when they do, it’s also for auditing purposes. Suppose you hire an employee that does go rogue and spies on people. You certainly won’t, but it needs to be audited for those that will. It’s very hard to fire people these days.Like I said, I dont need to spy on anyone, its support for our users. Sometimes all I'm doing is making sure users are following instructions after a roll out (which most dont and end up causing a big screw up). What I dont need is a big banner coming up saying 'I'm watching you!!'.
and as I keep saying you can't have an opt out that will not get exploited.
I meant we are being too spoiled.We're on a mac forum talking about event technology. How is this even an argument?
Every business is different. Our IT gets inventory of our software and OS versions so they DONT need to watch our screens. And when they do, it’s also for auditing purposes. Suppose you hire an employee that does go rogue and spies on people. You certainly won’t, but it needs to be audited for those that will. It’s very hard to fire people these days.
They could equally address it with a feature, we have no idea what the future will bring.The problem with this is like the article says, while there is a workaround today, Apple could patch said workaround.