How much time and how many posts have you wasted on here trying to convince people that this very real problem is NOT a problem?
If you don't feel it's a problem, just move on. How dare you try to minimize other people's desire for a quality product.
Hehe, "how dare I", would you take it easy. I can't really see how what I just posted merits a reply like that. Guys like you seem to think this thread is ONLY for those agreeing that a bit of light bleeding is an unsurmountable problem, and not for those offering another perspective. So suddenly because I have a different view, I am wasting my time posting in here. Give me a break.
I posted a link offering genuine new information and commented on it. How can that annoy you so much?
Back on topic, I think that perhaps the manufactoring of only perfect screens would simply be too expensive - they would have to discard too many, and as a consequence the price would go up. It's the same as it was with dead/stuck pixels some years back, you simply had to live with getting 1 or 2 dead pixels...
Then again, I guess a way of forcing manufacturers to improve is to complain, but I still can't quite decide on this issue - is it really that much of a problem or are people overreacting? I know it's not a problem in my usage, but if you do watch many movies in the dark at 50-100 % brightness, then I could see it being annoying. My eyes would be killed by the bright light, but that's just me of course.
Finally, there is the principle of the product not being "perfect", and I DO understand that concern. I really don't know. I certainly don't think this is a black and white issue as in "all light bleeding is unacceptable", because it's a general issue with LCDs.
I guess you are right in that I am wasting my time, though, in merely politely stating a bit of a different view than the dominant one, if all I gain is hostility like what you just displayed.